All poems

明 Ming · 诗 Poem

观裂帛湖

Viewing the Liebo Lake

谭元春

Tan Yuanchun

山水landscape 隐逸reclusion 哲理Philosophy

荇藻蕴水天，湖以潭为质。
龙雨眠一湫，畏人多自匿。
百怪靡不为，喁喁如鱼湿。
波眼各自吹，肯同众流急。
注目不暂舍，神肤凝为一。
森哉发元化，吾见真宰滴。

Pondweed holds the water and sky; the lake takes the deep pool as its very substance.
A dragon in rain sleeps in one hollow; fearing men, it mostly hides itself.
No strange thing it will not do; it murmurs like a wet fish.
Its wave-eyes each blow their own; how would it match the hurrying crowd of streams?
I fix my gaze and will not let go; my spirit and skin congeal into one.
Awesome — it reveals the primal transformation; I see the True Ruler's drip.

Listen

Meaning

Pondweed gathers the colour of water and sky; the lake takes the deep pool as its essence. A dragon sleeps in rain in a single hollow, hiding from men. Every strangeness appears; it murmurs like a wet fish. Its wave-eyes blow each on their own, unwilling to race the other streams. The poet fixes his gaze unceasingly until spirit and skin become one. Awesome, it discloses the primal transformation; he sees the drip of the True Ruler.

荇菜水藻把水色和天色蕴涵在一起，这湖以深潭作为它的本质。神龙趁着雨势潜伏眠息在一方水穴之中，因为畏惧人迹而多半自我藏匿。湖中百般灵怪无不为幻，发出喁喁的低语声，如同湿漉漉的鱼群在吐泡。湖波像一只只眼睛各自吹出圈圈涟漪，岂肯与众多水流那样争相奔急。我凝神注目，不肯片刻移开，精神与肌肤仿佛凝成一体。森然可畏啊，造化的奥秘在此显发，我仿佛看见真宰正从一滴水珠中渗漏出来。

Appreciation

Tan Yuanchun was a founder, with Zhong Xing, of the Jingling school, whose verse prized 'spirit' and 'depth,' seeking a secluded, lone, sharp air through cold, odd images and an astringent syntax. This poem on the Liebo Lake (one precursor of today's Kunming Lake in the Western Hills) does not write the lake's bright beauty in the usual landscape manner, but reaches for the hidden, strange 'primal transformation' beneath its surface — a representative of the Jingling 'narrow and secluded' realm. The opening sets the lake's secluded essence by calling the pool its 'substance'; it then peoples the water with a sleeping dragon and a hundred monsters, making a secret, living world; the close lifts to a forgetting of self and things and ends on a Zhuangzi insight into the True Ruler.

【白话串讲】谭元春在裂帛湖边凝神看了很久：“注目不暂舍，神肤凝为一”。湖水深邃，“森哉发元化，吾见真宰滴”——他从湖水里，看到了造物主。【意象与手法】此诗最奇处在以「质」论景的抽象笔法。起句「湖以潭为质」不写湖光潋滟而直揭湖的本质是深潭，立论奇峭，迥异于泛写湖色的常调；继而铺陈龙眠、百怪、喁喁、波眼等幽僻意象，把湖写成形具灵怪、潜藏生机的幽秘之境。「肯同众流急」以湖之从容反衬众流之躁，见孤往之趣；末二联写观者「注目不暂舍」「神肤凝为一」的物我两忘，终归于「吾见真宰滴」的造化体悟，由景入理，幽峭中见沉思。全诗意象冷峭、句法生涩，正是竟陵派「幽深孤峭」诗风的典型标本。【情感与主旨】谭元春（1586—1637），字友夏，号鹄湾，湖广竟陵（今湖北天门）人，与钟惺同里，共创竟陵派，合编《诗归》行世。其诗主张「灵」与「厚」结合，追求幽情单绪，好以僻冷意象、生涩句法表现内敛心境。此诗观裂帛湖而不写其明秀，专抉发湖底幽怪潜藏、真宰隐现的「元化」之秘，正是以幽深的眼光看取自然、在寂寞荒寒中见造化森严的竟陵审美，也透露出作者孤往自守、不与世逐的人格姿态。【名句点睛】「波眼各自吹，肯同众流急」二句以湖波自吹、不肯逐流，写出一种孤往自守的姿态，实为作者人格的自喻；「吾见真宰滴」更以「滴」字量化造化之秘，生新奇警，是竟陵派炼字求险求深的典型，历来为评家所称道。

Background

Tan Yuanchun (1586-1637), courtesy Youxia, style Huwan, was a man of Jingling who with his townsman Zhong Xing founded the Jingling school and compiled the 'Shi Gui' (Return to Poetry) that spread widely. His poetry urged 'spirit' and 'depth,' pursuing a dark, lone, sharp air and writing 'solitary feeling, single thread,' favouring cold, odd images and a raw syntax to express an inward mood. The Liebo Lake lay in the Western Hills of Beijing, one source of today's Kunming Lake in the Summer Palace. This poem was written on a visit to the lake; rather than its fair scene, it seeks the hidden monsters and the 'primal transformation' below — typical of Jingling's secluded taste.

谭元春（1586—1637），字友夏，号鹄湾，湖广竟陵（今湖北天门）人，明代文学家，与同里钟惺共创竟陵派，合编《古诗归》《唐诗归》（合称《诗归》）行世，在当时影响极大。竟陵派崛起于万历后期，针对公安派「独抒性灵」流于浅俗率易的弊端，主张以「幽深孤峭」矫正之，追求「幽情单绪」「别趣奇理」，好以僻冷意象、生涩句法、险仄声调表现内敛幽微的心境，一时风靡诗坛。裂帛湖在北京西山一带，为天然湖泊，水色澄碧，是明清文人游赏吟咏的胜地（一说与今颐和园昆明湖一带有渊源）。此诗即谭元春游观裂帛湖所作，却一反寻常山水诗写湖光明秀的常格，不写湖面的澄碧开阔，而抉发湖底幽怪潜藏、真宰隐现的幽秘境界，将一座小湖写成蕴藏造化玄机的灵境。这一写法正体现竟陵派以主观幽思熔铸山水、于寂寞荒寒中见森严气象的审美追求，是了解竟陵派诗风的重要文本。竟陵派论诗主「灵」与「厚」，以为诗乃「幽情单绪」之所托，主张于山水物色中抉发其幽深微眇处，故其写景常弃常取怪、弃明取暗；此诗正可视为这一诗学主张的完整示范，亦是后世研究晚明诗风转向时必读的文本。

Art

The opening 'Pondweed holds the water and sky; the lake takes the deep pool as its substance' fixes the lake's secluded essence with the three words 'as its substance,' quite unlike an ordinary lake sketch. Then 'a dragon in rain sleeps in one hollow,' 'no strange thing it will not do,' 'its wave-eyes each blow their own' make the lake a secret, spirit-haunted, living realm — images odd and remote. 'How would it match the hurrying crowd of streams' contrasts the lake's composure against the world's restlessness, showing a lone, self-pleased air. The last two couplets write the viewer's 'spirit and skin congeal into one' — a forgetting of self and things — and end on 'I see the True Ruler's drip,' a grasp of creation; from scene to principle, thoughtful within the secluded sharpness.

此诗艺术上最突出处，是以「质」论景的抽象立论与幽怪意象系统的营造。起句「荇藻蕴水天，湖以潭为质」先以荇藻为媒，写水色天色互相蕴涵，随即以「潭为质」三字直揭湖的本质——不写光色之表，而写幽深之里，立论奇峭，迥异于泛写湖光的常调。中间四句铺陈湖中秘景：龙雨眠湫、百怪为幻、喁喁如鱼、波眼自吹，以龙、湫、怪、眼等幽僻意象，把湖写成形具灵怪、潜藏生机的幽秘之境；「波眼各自吹，肯同众流急」更以拟人笔法写湖波自吹涟漪、不肯逐流，赋予湖一种孤往自守的品格，反衬众流之躁。末二联转入观照与体悟：「注目不暂舍，神肤凝为一」写凝神观照、物我两忘，「森哉发元化，吾见真宰滴」由景入理，在森然敬畏中窥见造化之秘。全诗由表及里、由物及我、由景入理，章法谨严，意象幽峭，句法生涩而自有内在的整一性，是竟陵派「幽深孤峭」诗风的典型标本。此外，诗中多用省略与跳跃，「龙雨眠一湫」不写龙从何来，「吾见真宰滴」不写如何得见，句与句之间留下大片空白，逼读者以想象补足，正是竟陵派「以深求深」的章法追求。

Allusions

'True Ruler' comes from the Zhuangzi's 'Equalizing Things' — 'as if there were a True Ruler, yet you cannot find its trace' — the inner lord of the cosmos. 'Primal transformation' means creation's working, in the line of Guo Pu's 'River Rhapsody.' 'Murmur' itself is from the Zhuangzi — 'the former sings yu, the follower sings yong' — here the lake monsters' low talk. 'Dragon' and 'hollow' draw on the Zuo Zhuan's dragon-fight and the deep-pool imagery, all secret signs. The poem's allusions mostly come from the philosophers' books — cold yet apt — showing Jingling's bookishness in its bid to be different.

此诗用典多本子书，冷僻而贴切，见竟陵派掉书袋以立异的习气。「真宰」出自《庄子·齐物论》「若有真宰，而特不得其朕」，指宇宙间无形的主宰者，即自然运化的内在力量；「元化」指造化、自然的运行变化，语本郭璞《江赋》一脉玄思（又近陈子昂「玄功应万物」之意），此处以「森哉」状其威严，言观湖而窥见造化之机。「喁喁」出自《庄子·齐物论》「前者唱于而随者唱喁」，本写风穴相和之声，此处移写湖中灵怪的低语，化用而翻新。「龙」「湫」连用，暗用《左传》「龙斗于时门之外洧渊」之典，「湫」为深潭之义，龙潜深潭正合裂帛湖幽深之质；「百怪靡不为」则本于古人对渊薮灵异的想象。至于「波眼」一喻，以眼写波，冷峭奇诡，暗含释家以眼观照水月之意。全诗故实皆出于经子，冷僻古奥，正见竟陵派以学问入诗、求深求奇的审美取向。另「百怪靡不为」一系想象本于《山海经》以来的志怪传统，而「喁喁」低语又令人联想到《楚辞·九歌》山鬼式的幽微吟啸，可见其典故体系兼采经、子与志怪，皆归服于幽深诗境这一总目标。

Commentary

Qian Qianyi, in his 'Lesser Biographies of the Liechao Poetry,' mocked Jingling for 'taking a chill voice and cold soul as charm, a thin sound and hurried beat as skill,' citing this poem's 'wave-eyes each blow their own' and 'True Ruler's drip' as examples of 'cold soul.' Yet moderns also grant it 'amid loneliness and desolation one sees the awfulness of creation,' holding that Jingling melts landscape through a subjective mind — astringent yet with its own inward deep beauty, not to be brushed aside.

竟陵派诗风自其诞生起便毁誉交加。钱谦益《列朝诗集小传》讥竟陵「以凄声寒魄为致，以噍音促节为能」，斥其诗有「鬼趣」「兵象」，此诗「波眼各自吹」「真宰滴」一类奇句正被视为「寒魄」之例，招致清初诗家群起攻讦。然平心而论，竟陵派矫正公安之浅俗，追求幽深奇僻，虽不免生涩晦涩之弊，却自有其价值：它以主观幽思熔铸山水，将自然写成一个与人心相通、蕴藏玄机的灵境，于寂寞荒寒中见森严气象，实开晚明山水诗一新境界。近人论者多许其「于寂寞荒寒中见造化之森」，以为竟陵派虽句法生涩、意象险仄，而自有其内敛深美，未可一笔抹倒。就文学史而言，竟陵派与公安派、前后七子鼎足而三，共同构成明代诗坛复古与革新交织的复杂图景；谭元春此诗正是考察晚明审美趣味转向的标本，其幽峭奇警处，至今仍能予人以陌生化的审美冲击。后世选家或讥其晦涩艰深，或赏其幽深峭拔，聚讼数百年而不休，正说明竟陵派诗风的独特与争议性；唯其如此，谭元春此诗作为晚明审美嬗变的活化石，其文献与美学价值都不可轻忽。

Prosody

Form Five-character ancient-style poem (five-character gu)五言古诗（六联十二句）

Rhyme Ping-shui rhyme (zhi, hide, wet, hurry, one, drip — the entering-tone zhi group and others)押仄声韵：质（质部）、匿（职部）、湿（缉部）、急（缉部）、一（质部）、滴（锡部），皆为入声韵，韵脚短促急迫，声情峭拔冷峭。

Tone pattern Five-character old form, lean and hard in phrasing, not bound by tonal rules五言古体，不遵近体平仄，句式瘦硬拗峭；「龙雨眠一湫」「喁喁如鱼湿」等句奇崛生涩，节奏拗折，正合钱谦益讥竟陵「噍音促节」之评。

Reading note Jingling's secluded manner; cold images, astringent syntax此诗为五言古诗，十二句，每两句一联，六联层层推进，章法谨严。五言古体不拘近体平仄对仗，正便于竟陵派施展其拗折瘦硬的句法：全诗几乎句句奇崛，「湖以潭为质」「龙雨眠一湫」「百怪靡不为」「喁喁如鱼湿」等句或倒装、或生造、或以散文句法入诗，音节拗折顿挫，与唐人五古的流利畅达迥异。用韵上全押仄声入声韵——质、匿、湿、急、一、滴皆入声字，韵脚短促急迫，声情峭拔冷峭，正合钱谦益讥竟陵「以噍音促节为能」之评，也恰与诗中所写的幽怪、渊深、森然之境相表里：入声的促迫正好传达面对幽秘时的凛然屏息之感。句句押韵（六联句句押韵，一韵到底）更加强了全诗紧促凝敛的力度。这种以声韵配合诗境的自觉，正是竟陵派「声情并重」诗学的体现：他们的诗不求圆融悦耳，而求峭厉惊心，音节本身就是其幽深孤峭审美的一部分。

Line by line

荇藻蕴水天，湖以潭为质

Pondweed holds the water and sky; the lake takes the deep pool as its very substance.

荇菜水藻把水色和天色蕴涵在一起，这湖以深潭作为它的本质。

Floating weeds enclose water and sky; the lake's essence is its deep pool.

起句立骨，以「质」论景，是竟陵派最典型的抽象笔法。「蕴」字写荇藻浮于水面，仿佛把水色与天色一同蕴涵收纳，湖面由此成为天光水色的容器；「湖以潭为质」更不写湖光潋滟之表，而直揭湖之为湖的本质在于深潭——水的清浅可见是表，渊深莫测是里，表里之间，湖的幽邃本性被一语道破。这种不以形色写景、而以本质立论的写法，正是竟陵派「幽深孤峭」诗学的体现：他们不屑于「水面清圆，一一风荷举」式的常景，而要在平常之物中抉发幽微的本质。「潭为质」三字奇峭警拔，为全篇定下幽深基调，也为下文龙眠、百怪、真宰的展开埋下伏笔。

The essence. Floating weeds enclose water and sky; the lake's essence is its deep pool. The weeds enclosing water and sky, and the lake defined by its depth, are the Jingling school's abstract opening. To have defined the lake by its depth would be a definition; the floating-weeds-enclose-water-and-sky against the lake's-essence-is-its-deep-pool is the definition.

龙雨眠一湫，畏人多自匿

A dragon in rain sleeps in one hollow; fearing men, it mostly hides itself.

神龙趁着雨势潜伏眠息在一方水穴之中，因为畏惧人迹而多半自我藏匿。

The dragon sleeps in the rain within one dark pool, shy of men and mostly hidden.

此联写湖中潜藏之秘，是竟陵派幽怪想象的集中呈现。「龙雨」谓随雨而来的龙，或龙行必有雨，写龙眠于「一湫」（一方深潭），以「眠」字状其潜伏，暗含龙之幽潜待时的意味；「畏人多自匿」更以拟人笔法写龙因人迹而藏匿，仿佛这湖里的灵异只肯在无人处显现。两句以龙、湫、匿等字构筑一个幽秘空间：湖不再是供人游赏的明净水面，而是一座藏着灵怪的深潭，人的到来反使灵怪退藏。这种写法把自然写得有灵、有性、有戒心，正是竟陵派「幽情单绪」的诗学追求——他们不写人与自然的亲近融合，而写人面对自然幽深之处的敬畏与疏离，审美趣味与唐人山水诗的明朗开阔截然异趣。

The dragon. The dragon sleeps in the rain within one dark pool, shy of men and mostly hidden. The dragon sleeping in the pool and shy of men are the mysterious depths. To have hidden a dragon in the pool would be a fantasy; the dragon-sleeps-in-the-rain-within-one-dark-pool-shy-of-men-and-mostly-hidden is the fantasy.

波眼各自吹，肯同众流急

Its wave-eyes each blow their own; how would it match the hurrying crowd of streams?

湖波像一只只眼睛各自吹出圈圈涟漪，岂肯与众多水流那样争相奔急。

The wave-eyes each blow their own circles; would they rush with the common currents?

此为全诗最有神采之句，以「波眼」喻湖波，奇峭生新：水波一圈圈漾开，如一只只眼睛在湖面眨动，「各自吹」写每圈波纹自成一气、各自吐纳，仿佛湖自有其生命节律；「肯同众流急」以反问作结，写这湖波不肯与众多水流那样争相奔涌，孤往自守、从容自若。表面写湖，实则以湖自喻：谭元春不屑随波逐流、趋时媚俗，正如湖波之不肯「同众流急」。「眼」字更赋予湖以灵明观照之性，湖在观人，人亦观湖，主客之间暗含禅机。此联意象冷峭、句法拗折，正是竟陵派炼字求险、以奇句立异的典型，也是全篇由写景转向自喻与哲思的枢纽。

The eyes. The wave-eyes each blow their own circles; would they rush with the common currents? The wave-eyes and the refusal to rush with the currents are the Yuan Dao self-image. To have personified the waves as eyes would be a personification; the wave-eyes-each-blow-their-own-circles against the would-they-rush-with-the-common-currents question is the personification.

注目不暂舍，神肤凝为一

I fix my gaze and will not let go; my spirit and skin congeal into one.

我凝神注目不肯片刻移开，精神与肌肤仿佛凝成一体。

My gaze does not leave it for a moment; spirit and flesh congeal into one.

此联写观照之境，是全诗由物及我的转折。「注目不暂舍」写观者目光凝固、须臾不离，一个「暂」字写尽痴迷——不是片刻的欣赏，而是灵魂被湖的神秘攫住的凝视；「神肤凝为一」更进一步，写凝神久之，精神与肌肤、身心内外浑然一体，物我之间的界限消融。这一过程与庄子「心斋」「坐忘」的修养工夫相通，也与佛家止观冥想的境界暗合：当观照达到极致，观者不再是以外物为对象的「我」，而是与湖、与造化融为一体的存在。两句以凝练的笔墨写出审美体验由感官到精神的递进，为末句「吾见真宰滴」的顿悟蓄势，使全诗由幽怪之景自然升华为哲思之境，章法上起承转合，浑然一体。

The gaze. My gaze does not leave it for a moment; spirit and flesh congeal into one. The unbroken gaze and the spirit-flesh unity are the mystical watching. To have described the gazing that unites self and lake would be a state; the my-gaze-does-not-leave-it-for-a-moment against the spirit-and-flesh-congeal-into-one is the state.

森哉发元化，吾见真宰滴

Awesome — it reveals the primal transformation; I see the True Ruler's drip.

森然可畏啊，造化的奥秘在此显发，我仿佛看见真宰从一滴水珠中渗漏出来。

Awesome, the unfolding of creation! I see the true Ruler dripping through a drop.

末联收束全诗，由观照而入顿悟。「森哉」以感叹词领起，写造化显发时森然可畏的庄严气象；「发元化」谓湖中幽景正是自然运化之机的显现；「吾见真宰滴」最见奇思——以「滴」字写真宰，仿佛宇宙的主宰从一滴水珠中渗漏而出，将无限的造化之秘凝聚于一滴微物之中，以小见大，生新奇警。「真宰」本出《庄子·齐物论》，此处化抽象哲理为可感的意象：一滴水即藏全湖，一湖即藏造化，观者于幽微处窥见宇宙的秩序与主宰。这种由景入理、以奇警之句点题的收束，正是竟陵派「求深求奇」诗学的极致表现；全诗幽峭的意象至此获得哲理的升华，读之令人凛然，亦令人深思。

The Ruler. Awesome, the unfolding of creation! I see the true Ruler dripping through a drop. The Zhuangzi true Ruler seen in one drop is the enlightenment. To have seen the Ruler in a drop would be a vision; the awesome-the-unfolding-of-creation against the I-see-the-true-Ruler-dripping-through-a-drop is the vision.

Study

Word focus

为质 To judge the lake by its 'substance' is an abstract thesis, showing Jingling's bookish, depth-seeking brush. 「湖以潭为质」之「为质」，是全诗立论的根基，也是竟陵派以抽象概念写景的典型手法。「质」本指本质、质地，与「文」「表」相对，此处以「潭」为湖之「质」，即湖的幽深渊默才是它的本质，而水面光色不过是其表相。这一立论将常见的「湖光山色」写法彻底反转：别人写湖取其上浮的潋滟之光，谭元春取其下沉的渊深之体，一字之转，境界迥异。「为质」二字以近乎哲学判断的口吻写景，冷峭而警拔，见出竟陵派不屑随人脚后跟、必欲独辟蹊径的创作心态。后世论者谓竟陵「以深心钝学求诗」，此二字正是「深心」的体现——于人人可见之湖，独见其不可见之质，可谓善观物者。

自匿 Writing the dragon hiding from men gives the lake a spirit-haunted, secret character. 「畏人多自匿」之「自匿」，写湖中灵怪因畏人而自我藏匿，是全诗将自然拟人化的妙笔。「匿」本为藏匿，「自」字则强调这是灵怪主动的、自主的退藏——不是被人惊散，而是「畏人」而自行隐没，仿佛湖里的龙怪自有其性情与戒心，不屑与尘世之人相见。这一写法赋予自然以主体的灵性：湖不再是静待观赏的客体，而是有灵的、有选择的独立存在，人迹所至，灵怪退藏，人反而成了闯入者。「自匿」二字与「眠一湫」的「眠」、「各自吹」的「各自」呼应，共同塑造了一个幽秘自守、不与世接的湖之性格；这种将自然写成有戒心的灵体的写法，正是竟陵派「幽情单绪」诗学在语言上的落实，冷峭而耐人寻味。

滴 A key expression in the poem. Read it as an image, mood, or grammar point in context. 「吾见真宰滴」之「滴」，是全诗最生新奇警的炼字。真宰本指宇宙无形的主宰，是极抽象、极宏大的概念，谭元春却以「滴」字写之——不是「见真宰」「悟真宰」，而是「见真宰滴」，仿佛那无所不在的造化主宰，正从一滴水珠中悄然渗漏、显现。「滴」字有三妙：一是以小见大，一滴水中藏全湖，一湖之中见造化，无限收于微渺；二是化抽象为可感，把不可言说的「真宰」落实为可以看见的「滴」的动作与形态；三是生新奇警，以名词动化、以微物状宏大，正是竟陵派炼字求险求奇的极致。「滴」字一出，全诗的幽峭意象（龙、怪、波眼）都获得哲理的归宿，湖的神秘至此有了着落，读者也仿佛看见那滴水珠在眼前颤动。