All poems

明 Ming · 诗 Poem

田家行

Song of the Farming Family

高启

Gao Qi

讽喻satire 民生people's livelihood

草茫茫，水汩汩。
上田芜，下田没。
中田有禾穗不长，狼藉只供凫雁粮。
雨中摘归半生湿，新妇舂炊儿夜泣。

Grass spreads vast; water gurgles and flows.
The high fields lie waste; the low fields are drowned.
The middle fields bear ears that never fill — scattered, they feed but wild duck and goose.
In the rain I pick and bring home half-raw, half-wet grain; the young wife pounds and cooks, the child weeps through the night.

Listen

Meaning

Grass spreads without end, flood-water gurgles and runs. The high fields lie waste, the low fields are drowned. The middle fields bear ears that never fill, scattered and only fit to feed the wild ducks and geese. In the rain they pick and bring home half-raw, half-wet grain; the young wife pounds and cooks, the child weeps through the night.

野草茫茫一片，洪水汩汩流淌。高处的田地荒芜了，低处的田地被水淹没。中间的田地虽有禾苗却长不出饱满的穗子，一片狼藉，只够喂野鸭大雁。在雨中摘回些半生不熟的湿谷，主妇捣米做饭，小儿在夜里哭泣。

Appreciation

This poem has but six lines yet clear layers: the first four lines give the disaster at large, opening with 'grass spreads vast; water gurgles and flows', then dividing the high, low and middle fields in three, writing the waste, the drowning and the empty ears, desolate; 'scattered, they feed but wild duck and goose' writes the total loss with ironic pen. The last two lines focus on one family — picking wet grain in the rain, the young wife pounding, the child weeping at night — using detail for exposition. The language seems plain yet every word is heavy with grief; the blank spaces move one to tears, showing the yuefu brush of 'valuing restraint, valuing compression'.

【白话串讲】高启写灾年的农家：上田荒了，下田淹了，中田的禾穗长不起来。“雨中摘归半生湿，新妇舂炊儿夜泣”——新媳妇舂米，孩子在夜里哭。明代农民的苦，写得扎心。【意象与手法】全诗仅六句而层次分明：前四句总写灾情，以「草茫茫，水汩汩」起势，继分上田、下田、中田三层，极写荒芜淹没、禾穗不实的苍凉；「狼藉只供凫雁粮」以反讽笔调写颗粒无收。后两句聚焦一家，雨中摘湿谷、新妇舂炊、儿夜泣，以细节代铺叙。语似平淡，实则字字沉痛，留白处尤催人泪下，体现「贵含蓄、贵凝炼」的乐府笔法。【情感与主旨】高启（1336—1374），字季迪，号槎轩，长洲人，明初诗人之冠，与杨基、张羽、徐贲称「吴中四杰」。元末战乱中久居吴淞江畔，亲见农村水旱灾害与赋役重压下的民生苦难。此诗为乐府体《田家行》，约作于其早年隐居时期，借灾荒图景反映农民艰辛，继承汉乐府「感于哀乐，缘事而发」的现实精神。【名句点睛】常考「上田芜，下田没，中田有禾穗不长」的排比层递；「狼藉只供凫雁粮」的反讽；「新妇舂炊儿夜泣」的细节留白；乐府体悯农诗的现实精神。

Background

Gao Qi (1336–1374), courtesy Jidi, from Changzhou, was the crown of early-Ming poets, one of the Four Masters of Wu with Yang Ji, Zhang Yu and Xu Ben. In the late-Yuan turmoil he long lived by the Wu-song river and saw firsthand the people's suffering under floods, droughts and heavy taxes. This poem is in the yuefu form 'Song of the Farming Family', likely written in his early retirement, reflecting the farmers' hardship through a disaster scene, inheriting the realist spirit of Han yuefu 'moved by joy and sorrow, born of matter', unlike his usual idle pastoral pieces in tone.

高启（1336—1374），字季迪，号槎轩，长洲（今江苏苏州）人，明初诗人之冠，与杨基、张羽、徐贲并称「吴中四杰」。元末群雄割据，张士诚据苏州，高启隐居于吴淞江畔的青丘，自号青丘子，以耕读为业。他久居江南水乡，亲见农村水旱灾害与赋役重压下的民生苦难：元末战乱频仍，水利失修，江南水乡常遭洪涝之灾，良田尽没，农民生计无着；又值赋役繁重，官府催科不止，民不聊生。此诗为乐府体《田家行》，约作于其早年隐居时期，借一场洪涝之后的灾荒图景，反映农民的艰辛与绝望。高启虽以「吴中四杰」之首名世，其诗以雄浑俊逸著称，然此《田家行》却以质朴白描写民生疾苦，继承汉乐府「感于哀乐，缘事而发」的现实精神，与其多数写景咏怀之作情调迥异，正见高启诗歌题材的广博与对民间疾苦的真切关怀。从创作语境看，此诗还带有元末明初特定的时代印记：元末江南屡遭战乱与天灾，张士诚据吴期间虽保境安民，然军费浩繁，赋役沉重，农民苦不堪言；洪武建元之后，江南又遭重赋（苏松重赋尤甚），水患频仍。高启生于吴中、长于吴中，对江南农村的疾苦有切身的体认，此诗写洪涝之后「上田芜，下田没，中田有禾穗不长」的惨状，正是江南水乡灾害景象的实录。诗人以「吴中四杰」之首的才情写农家的苦难，不事雕琢而字字沉痛，正见其「诗必关乎性情、系乎遭际」的创作主张，也为明初诗坛留下了最真实的一页民生写真。

Art

The whole is but six lines yet clear in layers: the first four lines give the disaster at large, opening with 'grass spreads vast; water gurgles and flows', then dividing the high, low and middle fields in three, writing the waste, the drowning and the empty ears, desolate; 'scattered, they feed but wild duck and goose' writes the total loss with irony. The last two lines focus on one family — picking wet grain in the rain, the young wife pounding, the child weeping — using detail for exposition. The language seems plain yet every word is heavy with grief; the blank spaces move one to tears, showing the yuefu brush of 'valuing restraint, valuing compression'.

全诗仅六句而层次分明，以灾荒为经、以农户为纬，织成一幅沉痛的悯农图。前四句总写灾情：起句「草茫茫，水汩汩」以两组叠词起势，野草连天、洪水奔流，声情并茂地写尽灾荒的惨淡；继以「上田芜，下田没」的对举句式，分写高地之田荒芜、低地之田淹没——上、下两田一芜一没，地势之异而灾情之重相同，极写水患波及之广；「中田有禾穗不长，狼藉只供凫雁粮」写中间之田虽未全淹，禾穗却长不起来，一片狼藉，只够喂野鸭大雁，以反讽笔调写颗粒无收的惨状——人无粮可食，禾穗倒成了禽鸟的口粮。后两句聚焦一家：「雨中摘归半生湿」写灾民冒雨摘回半生不熟的湿谷，「新妇舂炊儿夜泣」写主妇捣米做饭、小儿在夜里啼哭——舂的是湿谷、炊的是劣米，儿啼是饥饿的啼哭，以细节代铺叙，留白处尤催人泪下。全诗由面到点、由灾到人，语似平淡而字字沉痛，正是「贵含蓄、贵凝炼」的乐府笔法。

Allusions

This poem uses no recondite allusion, only plain description and yuefu common words. 'Song' is the name of a yuefu tune-type; Han yuefu had 'Song of the Army', 'Song of the Sick Wife' and the like, and Gao Qi borrows it to write the farming family's hardship, a modelled yuefu. 'Wild duck and goose' are the common fowl from the 'Book of Songs' ('shoot the wild duck and goose'); 'pound' means to hull rice by pounding. The whole piles no old tales, inheriting the 'Book of Songs' singer-of-his-food and Han yuefu matter-of-fact traditions, writing true suffering in plain language, thus moving and heavy.

此诗纯用白描与乐府常语，几乎不用典故，其「用事」主要体现在对乐府传统的继承与化用。「行」为乐府歌曲体裁名，汉乐府有《妇病行》《孤儿行》等，皆写民生疾苦，高启借《田家行》旧题写田家疾苦，属拟乐府，正是承汉乐府「感于哀乐，缘事而发」的传统。「凫雁」即野鸭与大雁，出自《诗经·郑风》「将翱将翔，弋凫与雁」的常物，此处以「狼藉只供凫雁粮」写禾穗被禽鸟啄食、人却无粮可食的惨状，以禽鸟之得食反衬人之失食，反讽含蓄而沉痛。「舂」指捣米去壳，是农家最寻常的劳作，《诗经》「或舂或揄」已见其端，此处「新妇舂炊」以最日常的动作写最悲惨的境况——舂的是灾后的湿谷，炊的是半生之米，寻常动作之中含着无限辛酸。全诗不事堆垛故实，承《诗经》「饥者歌其食」与汉乐府「缘事而发」的传统，以质朴之语写真实之苦，故能沉痛动人，正是乐府「清水出芙蓉」的本色。就意象传统而言，「凫雁」以禽鸟得食反衬人之失食，暗合《诗经·魏风·伐檀》「不狩不猎，胡瞻尔庭有县鹑兮」的刺贪传统与乐府「鸟雀饥」的悯农意象，以飞禽之饱写饥民之饿，含蓄而沉痛；「新妇舂炊」之「新妇」又暗含《孔雀东南飞》以来以新妇写家庭悲苦的叙事传统，一个「新」字写尽初嫁之妇便遭灾荒的辛酸，与「儿夜泣」的啼声相映，正是乐府民歌「以家写国、以小见大」的笔法。全诗取象皆农家日常，而古意自存，正见高启对乐府传统的深刻领悟。

Commentary

The 'History of Ming' says of Gao Qi 'his heavenly gift is high and free, truly above the poets of the three hundred years of early Ming'. Critics hold this poem 'written offhand, a few lines seemingly flat narration yet holding strong feeling', a special heaviness among early-Ming poems of pity for farmers, enough to show his creed that 'poetry must touch temperament and bear on circumstance', opening a care for the people's woe before the cabinet style arose.

《明史·文苑传》称高启「天才高逸，实据明初三百年诗人之上」，虽为过誉，亦见其在明代诗坛的崇高地位。论者以为此诗「信笔写来，寥寥数句，看似平铺直叙却蕴含强烈感情」，于明初悯农诗中别饶沉痛。高启此诗上承汉乐府悯农传统（《妇病行》《孤儿行》），中接杜甫「三吏三别」、白居易《卖炭翁》的写实精神，下开明代悯农诗的先声，在明初台阁体尚未盛行之时，已见关怀民瘼的现实主义精神。与唐代悯农诗相比，此诗自有其特色：杜甫写灾荒多直抒悲愤（「朱门酒肉臭，路有冻死骨」），白居易写民生多叙事铺陈，高启此诗则以极简的笔法、极淡的措辞写极惨的灾情，「上田芜，下田没，中田有禾穗不长」的排比层递，「新妇舂炊儿夜泣」的细节留白，皆以「不说破」为法，让读者在平淡的字句间自行体味那触目惊心的苦难，正是「贵含蓄、贵凝炼」的乐府笔法的极致，也是高启作为明初诗人之冠在悯农题材上留下的精品。

Prosody

Form Poem, yuefu style (mixed-length lines)诗·乐府体（杂言）

Rhyme Free strict rhyme, closing with oblique 'gu', 'mo', 'liang', 'qi', turning rhyme with the feeling不拘严韵，以「汩、没、粮、泣」等句收仄声，随情转韵，句式长短错落。

Tone pattern Ancient yuefu form, mixed long-short lines, not bound by tonal rules古乐府体，三、五、七言相参，句式自由，不尚格律，以气脉流畅、声情沉痛为主。

Reading note Models Han-Wei yuefu farming-family theme; plain language, three-, five-, seven-character intermixed此诗为拟汉魏乐府之作，采用杂言体，三言（「草茫茫，水汩汩」「上田芜，下田没」）、七言（「中田有禾穗不长」等）、九言（「雨中摘归半生湿，新妇舂炊儿夜泣」）相参，句式长短错落，正合乐府民歌「随事长短」的自由精神。乐府体的妙处在于「以句式的自由写情感的激荡」：三言短句急促，写灾情的惨烈（「上田芜，下田没」，一字一顿，如见灾情之重）；七言长句舒展，写禾穗的狼藉（「中田有禾穗不长」，一叹三折）；九言长句沉缓，写灾民的悲苦（「新妇舂炊儿夜泣」，如一声沉重的叹息）。用韵上不拘一格，随情转韵，以仄声字（汩、没、粮、泣）收句，声调短促压抑，正合灾荒的沉痛基调。全诗六句，由总到分、由面到点、由景到人，章法谨严而声情并茂，正是拟乐府在明初的典范之作——它继承了汉乐府「感于哀乐，缘事而发」的精神与杂言体的自由形式，又熔铸了高启个人的沉痛体验，以最短的篇幅写出了最深的苦难，是明代悯农诗中的精品。

Line by line

草茫茫，水汩汩

Grass spreads vast; water gurgles and flows

野草茫茫一片，洪水汩汩流淌。

Wild grasses stretch far; the waters gurgle.

起句以两组叠词起势，写尽灾荒的惨淡，是全诗定调之笔。「草茫茫」写野草连天、一望无际——田本应长庄稼，如今却野草丛生，荒芜之象已见；「水汩汩」写洪水奔流、汩汩有声——「汩汩」是拟声叠词，写水流声，以声写水，那不绝于耳的水声仿佛永不停歇，正是淹没田地的祸首。两组叠词对举，「茫茫」写视界之荒、「汩汩」写水声之喧，一静一动、一形一声，把「田荒水淹」的灾象写得如在目前、如闻其声。此句的妙处还在于节奏：三字一组、两组四句（实为两组三言），短促而沉痛，如两声沉重的叹息，先声夺人。以叠词起兴，正是乐府民歌的惯用手法，高启以此开篇，既见乐府本色，又以极简的笔墨写出了灾荒的全景，为下文分写上、下、中三田的惨状铺开了一幅荒凉的底色。

The wasteland. Wild grasses stretch far; the waters gurgle. The endless grasses and the gurgling flood are the opening. To have opened on the grasses and waters would be an opening; the wild-grasses-stretch-far-the-waters-gurgle is the opening.

上田芜，下田没

The high fields lie waste; the low fields are drowned

高处的田地荒芜了，低处的田地被水淹没。

The upper fields are barren; the lower fields are drowned.

此二句以对举句式分写灾情，极写水患之广，是全诗铺写灾情的核心。「上田芜」写高地之田荒芜——高地本可避水，却也因灾荒而废弃不种，「芜」字写田无人耕、野草丛生之状；「下田没」写低地之田被水淹没——低地临水，洪涝一来首当其冲，「没」字写田被水吞没之状。「上」与「下」对举，「芜」与「没」对举，一高一低、一荒一淹，仿佛整个村庄的田地，无论高地低地，都逃不过这场灾难：高的荒了，低的没了，还有什么可指望的？两句以最简练的对偶写出最惨酷的现实，地理的高低之别在灾难面前毫无意义，正见水患波及之广、之深。此句在章法上承「草茫茫，水汩汩」的总起，为「中田有禾穗不长」的第三层蓄势，上、下、中三层排比递进，正是乐府民歌「铺张扬厉」手法的运用，也是全诗写灾情最凝练的一笔。

The fields. The upper fields are barren; the lower fields are drowned. The barren upper and drowned lower fields are the disaster. To have drowned the lower fields would be a disaster; the upper-fields-are-barren-the-lower-fields-are-drowned is the disaster.

中田有禾穗不长，狼藉只供凫雁粮

The middle fields bear ears that never fill — scattered, they feed but wild duck and goose

中间的田地虽有禾苗却长不出饱满的穗子，一片狼藉，只够喂野鸭大雁。

The middle fields have grain, but the ears will not fill; it lies in disorder, fodder only for ducks and wild geese.

此二句是全诗写灾情的高潮，以反讽笔调写颗粒无收，沉痛入骨。「中田有禾穗不长」写中间之田虽未被淹尽，禾苗却长不出饱满的穗子——「不长」二字写禾穗半途而废、形同虚设，看似比上田下田稍好，实则同样颗粒无收；「狼藉只供凫雁粮」陡然翻出反讽之笔：那狼藉的禾穗，只能供野鸭大雁啄食——人指望它充饥，它却成了禽鸟的口粮。「只供」二字最堪玩味：不是人能吃的粮食，只是「只供」禽鸟的野食，人不如鸟的惨状，尽在这两个字中。此二句的妙处在于「以淡语写沉痛」：不直写灾民如何饥饿，只写禾穗只能喂野鸭，人间的惨境已在言外；禾穗狼藉是景，供凫雁是事，而灾民无粮可食的绝望，正是这景与事背后的潜台词，反讽含蓄而力度千钧，正是「贵含蓄」的乐府笔法。

The fodder. The middle fields have grain, but the ears will not fill; it lies in disorder, fodder only for ducks and wild geese. The grain that will not fill and the ducks' and geese' fodder are the irony. To have fed the ducks instead of men would be an irony; the middle-fields-have-grain-but-the-ears-will-not-fill-it-lies-in-disorder-fodder-only-for-ducks-and-wild-geese is the irony.

雨中摘归半生湿，新妇舂炊儿夜泣

In the rain I pick and bring home half-raw, half-wet grain; the young wife pounds and cooks, the child weeps through the night

在雨中摘回些半生不熟的湿谷，主妇捣米做饭，小儿在夜里哭泣。

Plucked home in the rain, half-ripe and wet; the young wife pounds and cooks, the child weeps in the night.

结二句是全诗情感的落点，由灾情聚焦到一家，以细节留白写断炊之惨，含蓄催泪。「雨中摘归半生湿」写灾民冒雨去田里摘禾穗——「半生湿」三字最见功力：禾穗是半生不熟的，人是在雨中摘回的，全身湿透、谷也是湿的，灾荒中的一线生机如此可怜；「新妇舂炊儿夜泣」写主妇连夜舂米做饭、小儿在夜里啼哭——「舂炊」写主妇捣米做饭的辛劳，「儿夜泣」写幼儿饥饿的啼哭。此二句的留白艺术极见功力：不写灾民如何绝望，只写冒雨摘谷、夜半舂炊、儿啼不止三个画面；不写饥饿如何难熬，只写小儿夜泣的哭声——那哭声里有饥饿，有寒冷，有灾荒年景全部的悲苦。以最日常的动作、最普通的哭声写最惨酷的现实，正是「于无声处听惊雷」的笔法，结句以「儿夜泣」戛然而止，余音在读者的心头久久回荡，催人泪下。

The weeping. Plucked home in the rain, half-ripe and wet; the young wife pounds and cooks, the child weeps in the night. The half-ripe wet grain and the pounding wife and the weeping child are the close. To have closed on the child's night weeping would be a close; the plucked-home-in-the-rain-half-ripe-and-wet-the-young-wife-pounds-and-cooks-the-child-weeps-in-the-night is the close.

Study

Word focus

汩汩 Onomatopoeia for flowing water; the doubled word renders the flood's spread and the fields' drowning. 「水汩汩」之「汩汩」，是全诗写水患的拟声叠词，以声写灾，声情并茂。「汩汩」摹写水流之声，那永不停歇的水声，既是洪涝肆虐的宣告，也是灾民心头挥之不去的梦魇——水声越响，田地淹没得越多，生计越无着落。叠词「汩汩」音调短促而连续，读来如闻那水声哗哗不绝，仿佛看到洪水在田间奔流、在屋檐下流淌的惨状。以声音写灾难，比直接写水势更添一层压迫感：水不是静止的淹没了田地，而是日夜奔流、汩汩作响，无时无刻不在提醒灾民灾难正在进行。与「草茫茫」对举，「茫茫」以视觉写荒芜、「汩汩」以听觉写水患，一形一声，交相叠加，把灾荒写得既看得见又听得见，正是乐府民歌叠字手法的妙用，也是全诗起句定调的关键词。

狼藉 Scattered and disorderly; writes the ears fallen, no harvest — holding pity and irony. 「狼藉只供凫雁粮」之「狼藉」，写禾穗倒伏杂乱、满地散乱之状，是全诗写绝收的传神之笔。「狼藉」本指狼群卧过之处草皆杂乱，引申为散乱不堪，此处写田中的禾穗东倒西歪、凌乱散落，一片衰败——不是丰收的沉甸甸的禾穗，而是灾后的狼藉残禾，连穗子都没长饱满，横七竖八地倒在泥水里。这个词的妙处在于「以景写哀」：狼藉的禾穗是眼前之景，而它背后是农民一年辛劳的付诸东流——播种、耕耘、除草，到头来只落得满地狼藉，只能喂野鸭大雁。「狼藉」二字看似平实，实则暗含无限的痛惜与反讽：庄稼本该是人的希望，如今却狼藉如垃圾，只配作禽鸟之食，人的绝望尽在词中。一字一词，写尽灾荒年景农民的辛酸，正是高启炼字「于平淡处见功力」的体现。

半生湿 Half-raw, half-wet grain; shows the victims' plight of eating unripe grain to fill hunger. 「雨中摘归半生湿」之「半生湿」三字，是全诗写灾民生计之惨最凝练的一笔。「半生」写禾穗半生不熟——灾后的禾穗本未长成，勉强可摘，却只是「半生」的劣谷；「湿」写谷被雨水浸透——冒雨摘回的谷子湿漉漉的，既难保存又难脱粒。「半生」与「湿」二字叠加，写尽这「救命粮」的可怜：不熟、不干、不多，三个字把灾民最后的指望写得如此寒酸。更妙的是「摘归」二字之前以「雨中」点染：冒雨、涉水、在泥泞的田里一粒一粒地摘那些半生不熟的湿穗——这画面里没有哭喊，没有怨叹，只有灾民沉默的挣扎，正是「于无声处见惨酷」的白描功力。三个字，写尽了灾荒年景中一个家庭全部的悲苦与挣扎，也与结句「儿夜泣」的哭声遥遥呼应，是白居易式「以细节写民生」的笔法在明代诗人笔下的延续。

田家行