近现代 近现代 · 诗 Poem
洗衣歌
The Washing Song
一件,两件,三件,洗衣要洗干净!
四件,五件,六件,熨衣要熨得平!
Four, five, six — press them flat!
Meaning
This is the opening of a long poem spoken in the voice of Chinese laundry workers in America. Counting articles of clothing, the speaker declares that the washing must be spotless and the pressing perfectly flat. On its own it is a working chant; in the whole poem it becomes an argument: the men who wash other people's dirty clothes are themselves cleaner than the society that employs them, and the poem's answer to the insult 'your father is a laundryman' is to insist that the work is done perfectly and that the workers are innocent.
一件,两件,三件,(这些衣服)要洗得干干净净!四件,五件,六件,(这些衣服)要熨得平平整整!
Appreciation
[Plain Paraphrase] Two lines, and the whole method. The first three words count — one, two, three — the way a washer's hands do; then a command in the plainest possible speech. The second line repeats the counting and changes the job. Nothing is symbolic here, nothing is beautiful, and that is exactly what the lines are for. [Structure] The two lines are parallel to the last letter: three three-character phrases, then a seven-character command, repeated with new numbers and a new verb. The parallelism is the structure of a folk song, and the counting has no end, which is the point — there is always another shirt. [Imagery] There are only two images, and both are conditions of the work: clean and flat. Neither is a poetic word. Their plainness is the poem's ethics: the worker's standard is not beauty or glory but a shirt that is clean and creased-free. Set against the rest of the poem, where the washer speaks of washing away sin, these two ordinary requirements become the beginning of a moral argument.
【白话串讲】 闻一多写《洗衣歌》:“一件,两件,三件,洗衣要洗干净!四件,五件,六件,熨衣要熨得平”——“我洗得净悲哀的湿手帕,我洗得白罪恶的黑汗衣”——他写中国洗衣工在异国的辛酸。 【意象与手法】歌谣体、数数起兴;复沓与排比营造劳动节奏;口语入诗,朴实刚健;以最寻常的劳动场景开头,为后文控诉种族歧视、为劳动者辩白的主题蓄势。 【情感与主旨】以洗衣工的劳动唱出底层劳动者的尊严——洗衣、熨衣虽卑微而必求干净平整,正见劳动者的认真与自持,是「把劳动写进诗里、把尊严还给劳动者」的爱国爱民之作。 【名句点睛】常考「一件,两件,三件,洗衣要洗干净」的数数起兴——以数字的单调写劳作的重复,以「洗干净」「熨得平」写劳动者的认真,是劳动歌谣的经典开头。
Background
Wen Yiduo (1899–1946) was from Xishui in Hubei, a poet of the New Moon school, a scholar and a democratic activist. He went to the United States in 1922 to study art in Chicago, Colorado and New York, and returned in 1925. In America he met the humiliation of Chinese students being asked, in effect, whether their father was a laundryman, since laundry was the most common Chinese occupation and was openly despised. He wrote this poem out of that experience, and it was collected in his 1928 volume 'The Dead Water', a book that marks his turn from pure aesthetics to satire and protest. The poem isprefaced with a note saying that laundry is the commonest of the Chinese overseas occupations and that many students cannot bear the insult, but that the occupation is not base. The excerpt is the opening of a much longer poem.
闻一多(1899—1946),本名家骅,湖北浠水人,新月派代表诗人、学者、民主战士。1922年赴美留学,先后就读芝加哥艺术学院、科罗拉多大学、纽约艺术学院,1925年夏回国。留美期间,他亲历了华人在美国的屈辱处境:中国留学生常被美国人问道「你爸爸是洗衣裳的吗」,洗衣被视为华人最下贱的职业。《洗衣歌》即写于这一背景,初稿约在留美期间,定稿收入1928年出版的诗集《死水》,原诗较长,篇首有题记:「洗衣是美国华侨最普通的职业,因此留学生常常被人问道:'你爸爸是洗衣裳的吗?'许多人忍受不了这侮辱。然而洗衣的职业并不是下贱的。……」此节选正是全诗的开头两行。闻一多归国后,目睹军阀混战、民不聊生,诗风由唯美转向沉郁,《死水》一集正是这一转变的产物,《洗衣歌》以华侨洗衣工的口吻,既写洗衣劳作之辛,更以「年年洗衣三百有六十日」的实情与「为甚要洗他们的脏衣服」的反诘,为劳动者正名、向种族歧视抗议,是闻一多爱国诗与写实诗的代表作。此节选两行,以数数的劳动节奏起兴,奠定了全诗「以劳动写尊严」的基调。
Art
The poem's first device is the counting, which is the oldest device of labour song — the same technique that makes a rower's chant. Numbers are monotonous, and monotony is the truth about this work: there is no end to it. The second device is the imperative 'wash them clean', which is both the worker's professional standard and his moral claim, so the most humble line in the poem becomes the noblest. The third is the exact parallelism of the two lines, whose sameness lets only the numbers and the final verb change; that economy is what makes the line memorable. And the whole excerpt is deliberately unpoetic in its vocabulary — no image, no metaphor, not a single ornate word — which is a bold choice for a poet famous for 'the three beauties' of music, painting and architecture. The beauty here has been moved from the wording into the rhythm of the hands.
此诗的艺术,集中体现为「歌谣体式、数数起兴、复沓成律、以劳作立尊严」四重特色,此节选则是这一艺术的开场。「一件,两件,三件」「四件,五件,六件」以数数的口吻起兴——洗衣工一边数着衣物一边劳作,数字的递增(一、二、三、四、五、六)正是洗衣顺序的实录,也是最古老的劳动歌谣的起兴方式(如《诗经》「七月流火」以时序起兴、采莲歌以「鱼戏莲叶东」的方位起兴),以单调的数字营造劳动的节奏,先声夺人。「洗衣要洗干净」「熨衣要熨得平」两个祈使句紧承数字,以「要」字写劳动者的自我要求——衣服要洗得干干净净,熨得平平整整,这是洗衣工的职业道德,也是做人的尊严。句式上两行完全对称:三三三字加七字,数字句短促急促,如手上的动作;要求句舒展坚定,如心里的誓言;「洗衣」对「熨衣」,「洗干净」对「熨得平」,对仗工整而口语自然。语言上纯用大白话,无一文饰,正合洗衣工的身份与劳动歌谣的体式。作为全诗开头,这两行以最朴素的劳动场景入诗,与后文「我洗得净悲哀的湿手帕,我洗得白罪恶的黑汗衣」的控诉、「为甚要洗他们的脏衣服」的反诘形成由实入虚、由劳入愤的推进,是「先铺劳作、后发抗议」的匠心结构。
Allusions
The poem sits on two traditions at once. The Chinese one is the labour song — the plucking songs of the 'Odes', the water-clearing songs of the south, the songs of the field — and using numbers as an opening is the oldest of their devices. Wen Yiduo is taking a folk form and putting it into modern Chinese free verse. The second tradition is the history of the Chinese laundryman in America: after the exclusion waves, Chinese immigrants were pushed out of mining and rail work into laundries and restaurants, and 'laundry' became the sign of a whole community. Against that, the poem argues from the work itself, and the line where the speaker declares he can wash away the black shirt of sin is a legal and religious claim in ordinary words. The poem also belongs to the May Fourth discussion about whether literature should serve the people, and to the verse of Liu Bannong and later to the direction of the Yan'an poets, who turned to folk forms for the same reason.
此诗的文化内涵,深植于十九世纪以来华侨洗衣工的辛酸史与中国诗歌「以劳动入诗」的民谣传统。洗衣在十九世纪赴美华工的职业谱系中占有特殊位置:早期华工多从事铁路修筑、采矿等苦力,排华浪潮兴起后,华人被迫集中于洗衣、餐馆等服务业,洗衣成为「华人职业」的代名词,甚至被美国主流社会视为下贱的象征——闻一多诗前题记所记「你爸爸是洗衣裳的吗」的侮辱性询问,正是这一历史处境的写照。《洗衣歌》以洗衣工口吻写「年年洗衣三百有六十日,我总要洗你(们)的……」,既是对这一职业的如实呈现,更是对「洗衣下贱」论的正面反驳:洗衣工洗的是「悲哀的湿手帕」「罪恶的黑汗衣」,他们比洗不掉罪恶的人更干净——以劳动之洁反讽文明之脏,是此诗最深刻的立意。从诗歌传统看,「歌」体(洗衣歌、采莲歌、敕勒歌)是中国民歌的古老体式,以劳动场景与复沓句式入歌,自《诗经·魏风》「十亩之间兮,桑者闲闲兮」的采桑歌、汉乐府《江南》「鱼戏莲叶间」的采莲歌一脉相承;闻一多取「歌」为体、以数数起兴,正是把中国民歌的源头活水引入现代新诗,使劳动者的歌谣在现代汉语中获得新生,其「以民谣写民生」的取向,与同时期刘半农《教我如何不想她》的民歌化尝试、后来的延安文艺方向遥相呼应。
Commentary
'The Washing Song' is one of the first long Chinese poems to take a labouring class as its subject, and it is the standard example of Wen Yiduo's later manner. Critics value it because it proves that the 'three beauties' he argued for are not limited to elegant themes: the counting gives the music, the clean and flat give the visual, and the two balanced lines give the architecture. Its political significance is larger than its length — 'the occupation of laundry is not base' is a defence of a whole people, written by a man who had personally been asked the insulting question, and it stands beside Ai Qing's 'Da Yan He' and Zang Kejia's 'The Old Horse' in the tradition of giving the labouring classes a voice in modern Chinese poetry. The counting line is still the most quoted opening in that tradition, and the historical detail it records — the laundry districts of American cities — makes the poem a document as well as a song.
《洗衣歌》是闻一多爱国诗与写实诗的代表作,也是中国新诗史上第一首正面书写华侨劳动者的长诗,此节选虽仅两行,却以劳动歌谣的形式为全诗定调,其价值可从三重维度衡量。从思想史看,此诗写于闻一多留美归来之际,把个人受辱的体验升华为对全体华侨劳工的声援,以「洗衣的职业并不是下贱的」的题记与「我洗得白罪恶的黑汗衣」的诗行,驳斥种族歧视、捍卫劳动者尊严,其「劳动神圣」的立场,在当时诗坛是罕见的进步声音,与艾青《大堰河——我的保姆》、臧克家《老马》等共同构成了新诗「为劳动者立传」的传统。从文学史看,此诗收入《死水》诗集,是闻一多由唯美转向沉郁的关键作品:诗中「三美」(音乐美、绘画美、建筑美)依然讲究——数数的节奏、对称的句式、口语的画面,却已注入现实的批判力量,证明格律诗并非只能吟风弄月,同样可以写劳工、写抗议,这对新月派「为艺术而艺术」的修正具有诗学上的意义。从接受史看,「一件,两件,三件,洗衣要洗干净」的数数起兴与「年年洗衣三百有六十日」的复沓,成为新诗中劳动歌谣的经典句式,被后世写劳动者题材的诗人广泛取法;而此诗所写的华侨洗衣史,至今仍是研究华工史、排华史的重要文学文献。百余年过去,洗衣歌中的劳动之声依然嘹亮——它提醒我们,最卑微的劳动里有最干净的尊严。
Prosody
Line by line
一件,两件,三件,洗衣要洗干净!
One garment, two, three — wash them clean: the count of the hands and the worker's whole professional standard in one line.
一件,两件,三件,(这些衣服)要洗得干干净净!
One piece, two pieces, three pieces—the washing must be clean!
首行以数数起兴,是劳动歌谣最古老也最有力的开场。「一件,两件,三件」三个数量词连续迸出,中间以逗号隔开,如洗衣工手不停歇地拿起一件、洗过一件、再拿一件,数字的递增就是劳作的节拍——这是从田间采茶歌、船夫号子一脉相承的「以数成律」,单调中自有节奏,重复中自有力量;数字从一到三,是劳作的开始,暗示后面还有无数件,「洗不尽」的意味已在数字中埋下。「洗衣要洗干净」紧承数字,以「要」字写出劳动者的自我要求——不是敷衍了事,而是必求干净,这一句是全诗立骨之句:洗衣虽贱,而洗则求净,劳动的态度即做人的态度。句式上三个三字短语急促如鼓点,七字长句坚定如誓言,长短相间,节奏鲜明。作为全诗第一行,它把读者直接带进洗衣房的水汽与皂香之中,让读者先听见劳动的声音,再听见劳动的心声——先「入其境」,后「感其情」,正是此诗布局的匠心。
The washing. One piece, two pieces, three pieces—the washing must be clean! The counted pieces and the washing-must-be-clean are the opening. To have counted the pieces would be a counting; the one-piece-two-pieces-three-pieces-the-washing-must-be-clean is the counting.
四件,五件,六件,熨衣要熨得平!
Four, five, six — press them flat: the same frame, the second half of the job, and the chant completed.
四件,五件,六件,(这些衣服)要熨得平平整整!
Four pieces, five pieces, six pieces—the ironing must be smooth!
次行以数字的继续与动作的转换,完成劳动场景的铺陈,是首行的复沓与推进。「四件,五件,六件」承接「一件,两件,三件」,数字由三进六,劳作由洗衣转入熨衣——洗衣是水里的功夫,熨衣是火上的功夫(熨斗),一湿一干、一洗一熨,把洗衣工完整的劳动流程呈现在读者面前;数字的递增暗示衣物的无尽,六件之后还有七件八件,日复一日,正是后文「年年洗衣三百有六十日」的先声。「熨衣要熨得平」以「平」字对「净」字——洗衣求净、熨衣求平,一个「平」字写熨斗下的耐心与细致:衣要熨得平平整整,不皱一褶,这是手艺,也是自尊。句式上两行完全对称(三三三加七),如两段相同的歌谣叠唱,复沓中见劳动的一成不变,也见劳动者对「净」「平」的一丝不苟。这一行与首行合观,是全诗劳动场景的完整开场:数、洗、熨,句句是劳作,字字是尊严——后文对「下贱论」的驳斥,正建立在这两行所写的认真劳动之上:洗得净、熨得平的人,如何会是下贱的?
The ironing. Four pieces, five pieces, six pieces—the ironing must be smooth! The counted four-five-six pieces and the ironing-must-be-smooth are the close. To have counted the pieces would be a counting; the four-pieces-five-pieces-six-pieces-the-ironing-must-be-smooth is the counting.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
'The Dead Water' calls a whole society 'a dead water of despair' and proposes to let its own ugliness be used to cultivate it. 'The Washing Song' takes the opposite side of the same quarrel and defends the worker, arguing that he is cleaner than his employers. Both belong to the same volume and both attack the same broken country, but one works by curse and the other by protest; one shows the country as a ditch and the other as a pile of clothes needing to be made pure. Together they are the two voices Wen Yiduo had after he stopped writing decoration.
《死水》与《洗衣歌》同收入闻一多1928年诗集《死水》,是诗人归国后诗风转向沉郁批判的两块基石。《死水》以「这是一沟绝望的死水,清风吹不起半点漪沦」写旧中国的污浊腐败,以「死水」的丑写社会之丑,是象征主义的批判杰作;《洗衣歌》以华侨洗衣工的劳动写劳动者的尊严,以「洗得白罪恶的黑汗衣」反讽文明的虚伪,是写实主义的抗议之作。相同处:皆以具体的物象(死水、洗衣)承载深广的社会批判,皆讲究格律与修辞(《死水》豆腐块式的建筑美,《洗衣歌》数数复沓的音乐美),皆在冷峻的描写中暗藏炽热的爱国心。相异处:《死水》以「丑」写恶,愤怒是隐忍的;《洗衣歌》以「净」写善,尊严是昂扬的。一为对旧中国的诅咒,一为对劳动者的辩护,合观二诗,恰见闻一多爱国诗的两种声调,也见其诗学由象征批判到写实关怀的拓展。
大堰河——我的保姆 Da Yan He — My Wet Nurse 艾青 · 同为现代新诗为底层劳动者立传的名篇,一写洗衣工、一写保姆 Both give the labouring classes a voice in modern Chinese poetry; one a laundryman, one a wet nurseAi Qing's long poem of 1933, written in prison, gives a peasant woman — his wet nurse — a whole life and a whole grief, and it is tender and personal; this poem gives a laundry worker two lines and a whole argument, and it is hard and public. Both put a working person at the centre and both repeat their opening line in order to hold the feeling in place. Where Ai Qing's poem is a memorial, this one is a defence, and being a defence it has to be stronger and shorter. Read together they are the two pillars on which modern Chinese poetry's record of the working classes rests.
艾青《大堰河——我的保姆》(1933年)与闻一多《洗衣歌》同为中国新诗为底层劳动者发声的代表作,一写乳母、一写洗衣工。《大堰河》以「大堰河,是我的保姆」的深情回环,写一位勤劳善良的农村妇女「含着笑」劳作的一生,控诉旧社会对劳动者的摧残;《洗衣歌》以「一件,两件,三件」的劳动歌谣,写华侨洗衣工的辛劳与尊严,抗议种族歧视对劳动者的侮辱。相同处:皆以底层劳动者的职业入诗,皆以重复的句式(「大堰河」「一件两件三件」)营造深情与节奏,皆把个人记忆升华为对劳动阶级的礼赞。相异处:艾青之诗是深情的怀念,以「我」对乳母的爱为轴心,温厚而哀婉;闻一多之诗是刚健的自辩,以「我们」对世人的抗议为锋芒,激越而昂扬;一为南方农村的土墙茅屋,一为海外异邦的洗衣作坊。两诗并读,可见新诗「为劳动者立传」传统的南北双璧,也见闻一多的刚与艾青的柔如何共同奠定新诗的现实主义根基。