南北朝 Northern and Southern Dynasties · 诗 Poem
入若耶溪
Entering Ruoye Creek
艅艎何泛泛,空水共悠悠。
阴霞生远岫,阳景逐回流。
蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽。
此地动归念,长年悲倦游。
Sky and water blend in a boundless gleam.
Evening clouds rise from distant peaks,
Sunlight chases the winding creeks.
Cicadas’ chirps make the woods more still,
Birds’ songs deepen the mountain’s chill.
This place stirs my thought to return,
Long years of travel make my heart mourn.
Meaning
The poet describes a leisurely boat trip on Ruoye Creek, with the sky and water blending seamlessly. The interplay of light and shadow, and the sounds of cicadas and birds, enhance the tranquility of the forest and mountains. The serene scene awakens a longing to retire and a sadness over years of wandering.
大船在溪上缓缓漂浮,天空与水色共是一片悠远。背阴的晚霞从远山升起,阳光追逐着曲折的回流。蝉声喧噪反而更显林间寂静,鸟鸣声声更添山谷幽深。面对此景,我萌生了归隐的念头,长年以来漂泊倦游的悲哀涌上心头。
Appreciation
This poem is a masterpiece of using sound to accentuate silence. The couplet 'Cicadas’ chirps make the woods more still, Birds’ songs deepen the mountain’s chill' is a classic example of contrast (moving to still). The poet’s emotional shift from enjoying nature to desiring seclusion is smooth and poignant.
【白话串讲】 “蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽”——蝉声越响,树林越显安静;鸟叫越多,山里越显幽静。王籍这句话,成了中国美学里“以动衬静”的祖师爷。 【意象与手法】 诗以“泛泛”“悠悠”叠词开篇,写舟行与水天之闲远 【情感与主旨】 王籍为南朝梁诗人,此诗当作于其游若耶溪(今浙江绍兴南)时。若耶溪为东南名胜,历代文人多所题咏 【名句点睛】 默写易错:“艅艎何泛泛”之“艅艎”(yúhuáng,大船,易误写);“空水共悠悠”之“悠”
Background
Wang Ji, a poet of the Liang Dynasty in the Southern Dynasties, wrote this poem while visiting Ruoye Creek (south of modern Shaoxing, Zhejiang). During the unstable political period, scholars often turned to nature for solace. The poet’s long official career made him weary, and this trip inspired a longing for reclusion.
王籍《入若耶溪》是南朝梁山水诗的杰作,历来以蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽一联驰名千古。王籍(生卒年不详),字文海,琅琊临沂人,南朝梁诗人,博学有文,性爱山水,曾任余杭令、中散大夫等职。此诗当作于其游若耶溪时。若耶溪在今浙江绍兴市南,为会稽名川,北流入镜湖,两岸山水清幽,自晋宋以来即为东南名胜,谢灵运、李白、杜甫皆曾题咏。王籍泛舟溪上,见空水悠悠、霞日生岫,闻蝉噪鸟鸣,于喧动之中悟得幽静之境,遂生归隐之念。在文学传统上,此诗代表了南朝山水诗由谢灵运的典重繁密,转向小谢式的清省与禅意的萌生——它不只是摹写山水,更在景物中写出一种超越喧寂的静观智慧,已开唐代王维、常建一脉以动衬静、于有声处写无声的禅趣山水。在六朝山水诗的流变中,此诗恰处于由谢灵运的繁富摹形转向王维式写意悟理的中枢位置,其以动衬静的一联,不仅写活了若耶溪的幽,更为后世确立了处理喧寂关系的美学范式,故虽仅八句,而影响及于唐宋千年。版本上,此诗文字基本稳定,唯阳景一作夕阳,今从阳景本(阳景即日光,与阴霞对举更工)。
Art
The poem opens with reduplicated words 'fan fan' (drifting) and 'you you' (boundless), creating a leisurely rhythm. The middle couplets depict light and shadow ('evening clouds' and 'sunlight') and contrast sounds with silence. The final couplet shifts from scene to emotion, declaring the wish to retire. The structure is balanced and anticipates Tang regulated verse.
此诗的艺术冠绝六朝,其章法由舟行、写景到悟理,意脉清远。首联艅艎何泛泛,空水共悠悠以泛泛、悠悠叠词写大船缓行、水天一色,起笔即是一片悠远闲适;颔联阴霞生远岫,阳景逐回流写晚霞自远山升起、日影追逐曲折的水流,设色明丽而对仗工稳,阴对阳、霞对景、生对逐,体物精微。颈联蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽是全篇的诗眼与千古名句:以蝉之噪、鸟之鸣这极动之声,反衬林之逾静、山之更幽,以有声写无声、以喧动写寂寥,翻进了寻常的静景描写。尾联此地动归念,长年悲倦游由景入情,写面对此境萌生归隐之念,收束于长年漂泊的倦游之悲。艺术上最突出者有三:一是以动衬静的反衬手法,蝉噪鸟鸣不但不破静,反而衬出静的深处,是辩证的写景智慧;二是叠词与对仗的精工,泛泛、悠悠的悠远,阴霞、阳景的工对,已具唐律气象;三是景、理、情三层递进,由舟中所见(泛泛悠悠)到耳中所闻(噪鸣)再到心中所悟(归念),浑然一体。全诗清丽而不浮、幽深而不晦,是南朝山水诗转向禅趣的关键之作。
Allusions
The technique of using sound to highlight silence traces back to Zhuangzi and Tao Yuanming. Wang Ji’s innovation lies in flipping the expectation: the louder the noise, the quieter the woods seem. This influenced later poets like Wang Wei (e.g., 'The song of birds deepens the mountain’s stillness').
此诗用典与化用多在山水诗传统与玄学理趣的脉络。其一为若耶溪,本为会稽名川,自晋宋即为文人题咏胜地(谢灵运《过始宁墅》一带多写其山水),王籍泛舟其上,承续了谢客寻幽探胜的山水游观传统。其二为艅艎,本指大船(语出《说文》及吴楚之舟名),此处以泛泛写舟行之缓,暗含《楚辞·涉江》与汉赋游仙泛舟的遗意;泛泛、悠悠则承《诗经·邶风》泛彼柏舟、悠悠苍天的叠词传统,以声情写闲远。其三为阴霞、阳景,阴对阳、霞对景(日光),渊源自《楚辞》与《周易》一阴一阳的对待观念,以阴阳二分写暮山的光影,设色而对仗极工;阳景一词亦见谢灵运诗(阳景罕隅基),王籍用之而与阴霞对举,更见锤炼。其四为蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽的以动衬静,其理趣根柢在佛家动静不二、色空相即的禅观与《庄子》的希声之辩——以有声显无声,正合维摩诘不二法门的辩证;此联后对王维(鸟鸣涧)、常建(万籁此都寂)影响极深。其五为倦游,承《楚辞·招隐士》与司马相如《上林赋》的倦游之叹,归念则近《归去来兮辞》的归隐主题。整体用典自然,句句有来历而语语如己出。
Commentary
The Book of Liang records that this poem was hailed as 'peerless beyond words' and widely imitated. Wang Anshi greatly admired the line 'Birds’ songs deepen the mountain’s chill'. Wang Fuzhi praised it as 'eternal grace' for writing stillness through motion.
此诗自南朝即负盛名,尤以其颈联蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽被推为六朝山水诗的绝唱。梁元帝萧绎曾抄写此联悬于斋中,以为佳咏;后世更有以此联与谢朓澄江静如练并称的。宋代王安石极赏此联,以为优于一般写静之句;明代胡应麟《诗薮》称其以动写静,乃静中之静,为唐人所未到。然亦有人(如王夫之)以为噪鸣破静、反伤其幽,持论不一,恰见此联引发的持久争议与经典地位。在传播史上,此诗的意义在于它确立了以动衬静这一中国山水诗(及后世山水画)的核心美学范式:静不是无声的死寂,而是在蝉噪鸟鸣中更显深邃的幽——这种辩证的静观,直接孕育了王维、常建的禅意山水。现代教育中,此联入选教材,成为讲授以动写静、艺术辩证法的最经典范例,噪、鸣、逾、更四字亦为炼字教学所重。其经典地位,在于以八句写尽了中国人于喧嚣中体悟幽寂的审美智慧,至今仍是山水诗不可绕过的标高。
Prosody
Line by line
蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽。
Cicadas chirp, making the woods even stiller; birds sing, deepening the mountain’s quietness.
蝉声喧噪反而更显林间寂静,鸟鸣声声更添山谷幽深。
The cicada's cry makes the wood more still; the bird's song makes the hill more deep.
这是全诗的千古名句,也是中国诗歌中以动衬静美学的巅峰之笔。蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽以蝉之噪、鸟之鸣这两种极喧动的声音,反衬出林之逾(更)静、山之更幽——声音不但没有打破静,反而把静推到了更深的境地。这种写法的妙处,在于它写出了静的辩证:绝对的死寂是无声可闻,而真正的幽静是在有声的背景中显现的,正如深林因蝉噪而益显其静、空山因鸟鸣而益显其幽。逾与更两个副词是全联的诗眼,它们把噪鸣与静幽之间的反衬关系点醒,使寻常景物获得哲学的张力。其理趣根柢在佛家动静不二、色空相即的禅观与《老子》大音希声之辩——以有声写无声,正合不二法门的辩证。此联的影响极为深远:王维《鸟鸣涧》月出惊山鸟,时鸣春涧中、常建《题破山寺后禅院》万籁此都寂,但余钟磬音,皆是其血脉的延续。千载之下,它仍是讲授以动写静、艺术辩证法最经典的范例,噪鸣二字亦为炼字所重。
The silence. The cicada's cry makes the wood more still; the bird's song makes the hill more deep. The cicada-cry-wood-more-still and the bird-song-hill-more-deep are the paradox. To have made the wood more still would be a making; the the-cicada's-cry-makes-the-wood-more-still-the-bird's-song-makes-the-hill-more-deep is the making.
艅艎何泛泛,空水共悠悠。
A large boat drifts slowly; the empty sky and river blend in a boundless expanse.
大船在溪上缓缓漂浮,天空与水色共是一片悠远。
How the great boat drifts on, sky and water one far distance.
这是全诗的开篇起笔,以舟行与水天的闲远,为后文的幽静之悟铺设了悠长的基调。艅艎本指大船(古吴楚之舟名),何泛泛写大船在若耶溪上缓缓漂浮,泛泛叠词既状船行之舒缓,也透出诗人泛游的闲适自在;空水共悠悠写天空与水色连成一片、同此悠远,一个共字将天与水打成一片澄明,一个悠悠叠词则把这份悠远拉长、放宽,令人顿生尘虑俱销之感。这两句的妙处,在于它以极省净的笔墨写出山水相接、物我俱闲的开阔意境,且以泛泛、悠悠两组叠词,使声情也随之悠长舒缓,先声夺人地定下全诗清远的调子。它与后文蝉噪鸟鸣的喧动形成对照:起笔是视觉的空阔悠远(静),继而转入听觉的噪鸣(动),最终又归于归念的沉静(悟)——由静到动再到更高的静,章法如波澜。同时,空水悠悠之境,已暗含谢灵运山水诗中那种澄怀观道的玄远,而较之小谢更见省净,是南朝山水由摹形转向写意的标志一笔。
The boat. How the great boat drifts on, sky and water one far distance. The great-boat-drifting and the sky-water-one-far-distance are the opening. To have drifted on would be a drifting; the how-the-great-boat-drifts-on-sky-and-water-one-far-distance is the drifting.
此地动归念,长年悲倦游。
This place stirs thoughts of returning; long years of travel fill me with sorrow and weariness.
面对此景,我萌生了归隐的念头,长年以来漂泊倦游的悲哀涌上心头。
Here the thought of home is stirred; long years I grieve the weary wandering.
这是全诗的收束与诗眼,由前面的写景、写声,最终落到写心,完成了从山水到人生的升华。此地动归念写诗人在若耶溪的幽静中,忽然被触动了对归隐的向往——这归念并非凭空而来,而是前面空水悠悠的开阔、蝉噪鸟鸣中更深的幽静共同酝酿的结果:正因山水如此可栖,才觉尘网尤可厌。长年悲倦游则点出归念的根由:诗人长年漂泊、倦于行游,身心俱疲,面对这片清幽,归隐之念便如潮涌起。动字极妙,它写出归念是被外境(此地)悄然触发的,不是强求的决断,而是水到渠成的感发;悲字则给这份归念染上沉郁——归隐之愿里,含着对半生倦游的悲慨。这两句与《楚辞》的倦游之叹、陶渊明《归去来兮辞》的归隐主题一脉相承,使此诗不止于模山范水,而有了生命的重量。由景(泛泛悠悠)而声(噪鸣幽静)而情(归念倦游),全诗完成了一次完整的山水悟道,余韵归入悠远。
The home thought. Here the thought of home is stirred; long years I grieve the weary wandering. The here-stirred-home-thought and the long-years-grieved-weary-wandering are the close. To have stirred the home thought would be a stirring; the here-the-thought-of-home-is-stirred-long-years-i-grieve-the-weary-wandering is the stirring.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
王维《鸟鸣涧》人闲桂花落,夜静春山空。月出惊山鸟,时鸣春涧中,与王籍蝉噪林逾静,鸟鸣山更幽同以鸟鸣(噪)写山之幽静,是东亚诗歌中以动衬静美学的嫡亲传承。差异在时代与禅味:王籍为南朝梁人,其以动衬静尚带玄学理趣与山水游观的痕迹,静中见理;王维为盛唐禅者,月出惊山鸟将这一手法化为空寂的禅境,鸟鸣非但不破静,反证春涧之空,静中见空、见佛性,禅意更浓。就意象,王籍写白日蝉噪、鸟鸣山之幽,王维写月夜鸟惊、涧中鸣,一明一暗、一闹一空,而辩证逻辑全同。合观之,可见以动写静这一核心范式,如何从六朝王籍的山水理趣(逾静更幽),演为盛唐王维的禅意空境(春山空),而《入若耶溪》的颈联,正是这座由南朝通向盛唐的桥上最亮的一块碑。
题破山寺后禅院 Inscribed on the Rear Meditation Court of Poshan Temple 常建 · 同以声写寂,唐人承六朝静观之趣 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
常建《题破山寺后禅院》山光悦鸟性,潭影空人心。万籁此都寂,但余钟磬音,与王籍《入若耶溪》同写于山水寺院之境中以声显静:王籍以蝉噪鸟鸣衬林山之幽,常建以万籁俱寂后唯余钟磬,反衬禅院之空寂。二者皆深得以动(声)写静的辩证,且都暗含佛理——王籍的动静不二近禅观,常建的万籁都寂、钟磬余音则直接是寺院禅境。差异在:王籍写的是自然山水中的幽静(若耶溪),基调清丽闲远;常建写的是佛寺禅院的空寂,基调清空寂灭。就手法,王籍以噪鸣正面反衬(逾静更幽),常建以寂后余音侧面点染(但余钟磬),一显一隐。合观可见,以动衬静作为山水诗(及题寺诗)的核心范式,自六朝王籍立其则,至唐人王维、常建臻其境,最终凝结为中国艺术(诗与画)处理喧寂关系的共通智慧。
石壁精舍还湖中作 On Returning Across the Lake from the Stone-Cliff Retreat 谢灵运 · 同写若耶(会稽)山水,大谢奠基、小谢王籍承而化之 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
谢灵运《石壁精舍还湖中作》(昏旦变气候,山水含清晖……林壑敛暝色,云霞收夕霏)写会稽(若耶一带)山水之游,与王籍《入若耶溪》同写浙东名川、同擅模山范水,且都于景中寓理(谢有虑澹物自轻,意惬理无违的悟道之语)。差异极鲜明:大谢诗典重繁密、铺排详尽,多罗列景物、结以玄言尾巴,尚处山水诗草创的繁富阶段;王籍诗清省省净、对仗工巧,以蝉噪鸟鸣一联写活幽静,已由摹形转向写意、由写景转向悟理,且沾染初萌的禅趣。就声律,大谢尚属古体,王籍已具律联雏形。合观二诗,可见会稽山水如何被一代代诗人题咏——从谢灵运的繁富奠基,到王籍的清丽升华,浙东山水诗的美学由此愈转愈精,终启唐人王维一脉的禅意山水。