All poems

南北朝 Northern and Southern Dynasties · 诗 Poem

晚登三山还望京邑

Climbing Three Mountains at Dusk, Gazing Back at the Capital

谢朓

Xie Tiao

山水landscape 望乡homesickness

灞涘望长安,河阳视京县。
白日丽飞甍,参差皆可见。
余霞散成绮,澄江静如练。
喧鸟覆春洲,杂英满芳甸。
去矣方滞淫,怀哉罢欢宴。
佳期怅何许,泪下如流霰。
有情知望乡,谁能鬒不变?

Gazing toward Chang'an from Ba's shore, viewing the capital from Heyang.
The sun brightens the soaring eaves, all visible in uneven rows.
Evening clouds spread into brocade, the clear river still like white silk.
Noisy birds cover the spring isle, various flowers fill the fragrant field.
Now I leave, yet I linger; thinking of it, I end the joyous feast.
The hoped-for date—where is it? Tears fall like sleet.
Those with feeling know homesickness; who can keep black hair unchanged?
Listen

Meaning

The poet climbs Three Mountains at dusk, gazes back at the capital Jiankang, depicts the splendid spring scenery, then turns to express his sorrow at leaving and longing for home.

诗人傍晚登上三山,回望京城建康,如同当年王粲望长安、潘岳视河阳。夕阳映照飞檐,楼阁参差可见;晚霞散作锦绮,澄江静如白练。喧闹的飞鸟覆盖春洲,杂花铺满芳甸。而自己即将远去滞留他乡,想起罢宴离京不胜怀念。归期渺茫令人惆怅,泪落如雪珠纷飞。有情人皆知望乡之切,谁又能不愁白了头?

Appreciation

The poem uses beautiful scenery to contrast with the poet's sorrow, a classic example of 'writing sorrow through joyful scenes'. The couplet 'Evening clouds spread into brocade, clear river still like white silk' is a famous landscape line, praised by Li Bai and later poets.

【白话串讲】 “余霞散成绮,澄江静如练”——晚霞散开像绸缎,澄江平静像白练。谢朓站在三山上回望京城,把黄昏的风景写成了千古名句。 【意象与手法】 诗分两层,前六句工笔铺陈京邑春晚之壮丽,“白日”“余霞”“澄江”“喧鸟”“杂英”层层设色,对仗严整而灵动 【情感与主旨】 谢朓为南朝齐诗人,此诗约作于其赴任宣城太守途中。诗人傍晚登上建康附近的三山,回望京城,触景生情 【名句点睛】 默写易错:“澄江静如练”之“澄”(水清,勿作“橙”);“余霞散成绮”之“绮”(qǐ,有纹彩的丝织品,勿作“椅”)

Background

Xie Tiao, a poet of the Southern Qi dynasty, wrote this poem when he was on his way to become governor of Xuancheng. He climbed Three Mountains near the capital and looked back, expressing his complex feelings of leaving the political center.

谢朓《晚登三山还望京邑》是南朝齐山水抒情诗的杰作,约作于齐明帝建武二年(495)前后。谢朓(464—499),字玄晖,陈郡阳夏人,南朝齐诗人,与谢灵运并称二谢,世称小谢。他历仕南朝宋、齐,因才名见忌,由中书郎出为宣城太守,此诗即赴任途中,傍晚登上建康(今南京)西南长江边上的三山,回望京城建康(诗题京邑即指建康)时所作。时诗人外放远郡,去国怀乡,登高临江,触景生悲,遂有此篇。在文学传统上,谢朓是永明体的代表诗人,与沈约共倡四声八病之说,将声律论引入诗歌,开唐律之先声;其山水诗清丽工巧,既脱谢灵运之典重,又启唐人(尤李白、王维)之清远。此诗前六句工笔铺陈京邑春晚之壮丽,后六句转入望乡之悲,是谢朓以景写情、小谢体物之妙的集中体现。用典上,起二句灞涘望长安,河阳视京县分别化用王粲《七哀诗》南登霸陵岸,回首望长安与潘岳(河阳令)引领望京室之意,以古人之望京写己之望京,既点题又暗含去国之情,是齐梁诗用事绵密的典型。版本上此诗文字稳定,唯澄江或作湛江,今从澄江本。

Art

The poem is in two sections: the first six lines depict the splendid spring scenery of the capital with exquisite couplets and vivid imagery; the last six lines shift to emotion, using contrasts and allusions to deepen the homesickness.

此诗的艺术冠绝小谢,其章法之妙在以乐景写哀情、以前丽后悲形成跌宕。全诗十四句,可析为两层:前六句工笔铺陈京邑春晚之壮丽——起二句以王粲、潘岳望京之典虚领,三四句白日丽飞甍,参差皆可见写夕阳下的宫阙飞檐、楼阁参差,丽字使飞甍生辉;五六句余霞散成绮,澄江静如练以晚霞如锦绮、澄江如白练,设色如画,对仗精严、比喻新警;七八句喧鸟覆春洲,杂英满芳甸写春洲鸟喧、芳甸花满,以动衬静、以闹反衬后文之孤。后六句陡然转折:去矣方滞淫,怀哉罢欢宴写将去他乡、罢离欢宴的怅惘;佳期怅何许,泪下如流霰写归期渺茫、泪落如霰;末二句有情知望乡,谁能鬒不变以反问收束,写望乡使人愁白头的至悲。艺术上最突出者有三:一是炼字精警,丽(使动)、覆(满布)、静(澄寂)皆一字见力;二是设色如画,白日、余霞、澄江、杂英构成绚烂的春日长卷;三是对仗工稳而灵动,五六句与七八句皆为律联,已具唐人气象。以极丽之景反衬极悲之情,景愈美而乡思愈苦,正是王夫之所谓以乐景写哀、以哀景写乐、一倍增其哀乐的范本。

Allusions

The opening couplet alludes to Wang Can and Pan Yue's poems of gazing towards the capital, establishing the theme of longing for home. The final line alludes to the 'Book of Songs' phrase 'black hair like clouds' to emphasize sorrow turning hair white.

此诗用典与化用主要在起句与意象传统。其一为灞涘望长安,河阳视京县,这是对举用事:上句化用东汉王粲《七哀诗》南登霸陵岸,回首望长安(或《登楼赋》的销忧聊暇日、望乡之叹),以王粲避乱望京写己之望京;下句用西晋潘岳为河阳令时引领望京室(京都)之意,以潘岳望京县写己望建康。二典皆写去国怀乡、引领望都,谢朓借以虚领全篇,既点还望京邑之题,又暗含自身外放、类同古人失志的身世之感,是齐梁诗使事绵密、以古况今的典型。其二为飞甍、京县,甍即屋脊,飞甍状宫阙檐角飞扬,承汉赋写宫观(如《西京赋》)与六朝都城建康的实录;京县指都城辖县,即建康。其三为澄江静如练的练,练为煮熟的白绢,以练喻江承《诗经·召南》与汉赋(如班婕妤《怨歌行》新裂齐纨素,皎洁如霜雪)的白绢意象,而喻江之澄白则自小谢始。其四为流霰,霰为雪珠,用《诗经·小雅·頍弁》如彼雨雪、先集维霰及楚辞的霰雪意象,以霰喻泪,状泪之纷落。其五为鬒,鬒指黑发,用《诗经·鄘风·君子偕老》鬒发如云,谁能鬒不变即言黑发为望乡而白,化用伍子胥、潘岳等愁白头的故实。整体用典贴切而不滞,句句有来历而语语如己出。

Commentary

Li Bai greatly admired Xie Tiao, quoting this poem. Yan Yu of the Song dynasty noted that Xie's poems already resemble Tang style. Wang Fuzhi praised the transition at '去矣' and '怀哉' as deeply touching.

此诗自南朝即负盛名,尤以其写景二联被推为齐梁之冠。唐代李白极推崇谢朓,其《秋登宣城谢朓北楼》江城如画里,山晚望晴空、两水夹明镜,双桥落彩虹,明显脱胎于此诗的白日丽飞甍、澄江静如练;李白更直呼解道澄江静如练,令人长忆谢玄晖,足见其倾倒。宋代王安石亦赏澄江一联,以为澄江如练之喻古今绝唱。明清诗评家如胡应麟《诗薮》称小谢澄江静如练,气象清远,为唐律之祖;王夫之《姜斋诗话》谓以乐景写哀,倍增其悲,正指此诗前丽后哀的结构。在传播史上,此诗的意义在于它标志着山水诗由谢灵运的典重繁密,转向小谢的清丽省净,并为唐代律诗(尤其王维、李白的山水行旅)提供了直接的范式——不仅对仗工稳,更把个人的去国之情融入澄明如画的景物。现代教育中,余霞散成绮,澄江静如练入选教材,成为鉴赏六朝诗风与炼字之美的经典范例。其经典地位,在于以十四句写尽望乡之悲,而景语之丽与情语之哀交映生辉,遂成齐梁诗歌不可绕过的标杆。

Prosody

Form five-character ancient verse (Southern Dynasty landscape poem)南朝齐五言诗(永明体,近唐律雏形;古体向律体过渡之作)
Rhyme xian, jian, lian, dian, yan, xian, bian (ancient style with free rhyme changes)全诗十四句,一韵到底,通押去声霰韵:县、见、练、甸、宴、霰、变古音同属霰韵,声情清远悠长,与望乡之悲的绵邈相协。
Tone pattern ancient style, but the middle four lines have meticulous parallel structure此诗为永明体代表作,已讲究四声八病与对仗黏合:中四联(丽飞甍、澄江练、喧鸟覆、杂英满)对仗工稳,声律谐婉,逼近唐人律联;句式以五言为主,节奏清丽舒缓,诵读时当于写景处轻扬、望乡处低回,以见乐景哀情之跌宕。
Reading note Xie Tiao is a representative of the 'Yongming Style'; this couplet set a precedent for Tang regulated verse.此诗体制上正处于古体向律体过渡的关键节点,是永明体(沈约、谢朓所倡四声八病)的典范标本。它虽为十四句的长篇而非严格八句律诗,却已具备唐律的核心要素:一是押韵一依平仄、一韵到底(霰韵),声情清远;二是中间写景四联对仗精严(白日对余霞、丽飞甍对澄江静如练;喧鸟对杂英、覆春洲对满芳甸),词性、句式相侔,已开律诗颔联颈联之格;三是讲究声律和谐,避八病,读来朗朗上口,直启唐代五律(如王维、李白的山水行旅诗)。更重要的是它的章法:前六句以丽景铺陈京邑,后六句以哀情写望乡,以乐景写哀、倍增其悲,这种情景反衬的结构,成为后世抒情诗(尤其登高怀乡之作)的经典范式。小谢以此诗证明,声律的讲究非但不能束缚情思,反而能使景愈清、情愈永。故胡应麟谓澄江静如练为唐律之祖,良有以也——它是一座由齐梁通向盛唐的桥。

Line by line

余霞散成绮,澄江静如练。

Evening clouds spread into brocade, the clear river still like white silk.

晚霞散作锦绮,澄江静如白练。

The evening clouds spread out like damask; the clear river lies still like white silk.

这是全诗最负盛名的写景联句,也是谢朓清丽诗风与中国山水诗的千古名句。余霞散成绮写傍晚的晚霞在天边铺展、散作锦绮(有纹彩的丝织品),一个散字写出霞光的自然舒展,绮字以织物喻霞,设色华丽而不艳俗;澄江静如练写桥下(或江面)澄澈的江水静静流淌,宛如一条白绢(练),一个静字写出江面的安谧澄明,练字以熟绢喻江,既写其白、更写其平与柔。此联之妙,一在动静相生:霞之散(动)对江之静(静),天上对水面,空间开阔;二在比喻精警而新鲜:以绮、练这两种织物喻霞喻江,是谢朓的独创,此前写江多重其浩渺(如澄江净如练的祖述),而小谢以白绢之柔写江之澄静,别具一种清远;三在对仗工稳、声律谐美,已具唐人律联气象。李白解道澄江静如练,令人长忆谢玄晖,正为此联倾倒。更为深妙的是,这极丽的晚景,恰是后文望乡之悲的反衬——景愈美,离京去国之痛愈显,乐景哀情,一倍增其哀乐。

The silk. The evening clouds spread out like damask; the clear river lies still like white silk. The evening-clouds-damask and the clear-river-white-silk are the couplet. To have spread like damask would be a spreading; the the-evening-clouds-spread-out-like-damask-the-clear-river-lies-still-like-white-silk is the spreading.

白日丽飞甍,参差皆可见。

The sun brightens the soaring eaves, all visible in uneven rows.

夕阳映照飞檐,楼阁参差可见;

The setting sun gilds the soaring eaves, tier upon tier, all visible.

这是紧承起句望京而来的实景刻画,写诗人回望中京邑宫阙的壮丽。白日丽飞甍,丽此处作使动用法,意为使飞甍(宫阙檐角飞扬的屋脊)显得明丽生辉——夕阳的金辉洒在层层飞檐上,使楼阁焕发出耀目的光彩;参差皆可见则写楼阁高低错落、历历在目,一个参差写出都城建制的宏阔与层次。此句的妙处,在炼字与视角:丽字是诗眼,它不写日光照甍,而写阳光使甍生丽,赋予无情之物以被照亮的鲜活感,与小谢善用使动、以字抉力的作风一致;参差则写出空间的纵深与城市的真实感,非泛泛夸饰。同时,它遥应起二句王粲、潘岳望京的典故——诗人所望见的,正是古人也曾引领而望的同一座都城,于是眼前的飞甍参差,便不只是风景,更是权力中心、故园与功名之所在的象征。丽景当前而身将远去,这明媚的宫阙愈清晰,离别的怅惘便愈深浓,为后文的泪下如霰埋下伏笔。

The eaves. The setting sun gilds the soaring eaves, tier upon tier, all visible. The setting-sun-gilds-eaves and the tier-upon-tier-all-visible are the city. To have gilded the eaves would be a gilding; the the-setting-sun-gilds-the-soaring-eaves-tier-upon-tier-all-visible is the gilding.

有情知望乡,谁能鬒不变?

Those with feeling know homesickness; who can keep black hair unchanged?

有情人皆知望乡之切,谁又能不愁白了头?

Whoever has feeling knows the longing for home; who can keep his black hair unchanged?

这是全诗的收束与诗眼,由前文铺陈的望乡之景、罢宴之悲,升华为一句直抵人心的反问。有情知望乡,有情指有性情、知离别之人,意谓凡是深于情者,都懂得望乡之切——此句把个人的离愁推广为人之常情,由一己之悲走向普世的共鸣;谁能鬒不变则以反问作结,鬒指黑发,全句言:谁又能不因望乡而愁白了头呢?言下之意,望乡之悲足以催人老,而答案显然是无人能免。这一结句的妙处,在于它举重若轻地将前面所有的丽景、欢宴、泪霰收束为一个关于乡愁与衰老的终极诘问,语似平淡却力重千钧。它与《登楼赋》的销忧、王粲的望长安一脉相承,却以更凝练的反问出之。值得注意的是,诗人不喊痛而问谁能不变,把必然的悲怆化为无可辩驳的常理,余味悠长。千载之下,望乡白头的母题不绝如缕,而小谢此问,正是这母题中最清婉的一声叹息。

The hair. Whoever has feeling knows the longing for home; who can keep his black hair unchanged? The whoever-has-feeling-knows-longing and the who-can-keep-black-hair-unchanged are the close. To have known the longing would be a knowing; the whoever-has-feeling-knows-the-longing-for-home-who-can-keep-his-black-hair-unchanged is the knowing.

Study

Word focus

练 white silk 澄江静如练之练字,是全诗炼字的典范,也是中国山水诗喻江的经典意象。练本指煮熟、漂洗后的白色丝绢,质地平展、洁白、柔润;诗人以之喻江,既写出江水在夕阳下澄澈泛白的光泽(色之白),更写出江面平静如铺展的素绢般的柔顺与延展(形之平)。这个比喻的独创性在于:前人写江多状其浩渺奔涌(如江流天地外),小谢却独取江之澄、之静、之白,以闺阁织物为喻,使宏阔的江水获得一种清远柔美的质感,开唐人写江如练(如李白、王维)的先声。其渊源在《诗经》与汉赋以纨素、霜雪喻白的传统(班婕妤《怨歌行》新裂齐纨素,皎洁如霜雪),而喻江则自谢朓始。练字之妙,还在于它与前句绮(霞如锦绮)形成织物对举——天上霞如绮、水面江如练,一绮一练,设色如织锦,章法极巧。李白解道澄江静如练,令人长忆谢玄晖,正为此字倾倒;一字之喻,遂成千年绝唱,足见小谢体物之精。
丽 make bright 白日丽飞甍之丽字,是此诗善用使动、以字抉力的代表,看似寻常却极见匠意。丽本为形容词(美丽),此处活用为使动,意为使……明丽、生辉,写夕阳的金辉洒在宫阙飞檐之上,使飞甍(檐角飞扬的屋脊)焕发出耀目的光彩。这个字法的妙处,在于它把被动的光照写成了主动的照亮——不是日光单纯地照在甍上,而是日使甍丽,赋予自然以礼赞都城的温情,也写出诗人回望京邑时那一瞬被点亮的惊艳感。它与小谢整体清丽的风味相合:丽而不艳、明而不浮,正是齐梁诗追求的光色之美。同时,丽字与下句静字(澄江静如练)形成明暗、动静的微对比——甍因日而丽(亮、动),江因夕而静(暗、静),章法细密。在声律上,丽为去声、与下句可见的见(去声)呼应,已具永明体辨声的讲究。一字使动,既写尽京邑之壮丽,又暗含诗人对都将远离的这座都城的眷恋,景语即是情语。
滞淫 linger 去矣方滞淫之滞淫二字,是全诗由景入情、点出仕途身世的关键词,含意需细辨。滞本义停留、不进,淫在此非淫邪,而是过分、久长之意(如《诗经》其流汤汤,维其淹也之淹,与淫通训为久);滞淫合言,即久留、淹留他乡。去矣方滞淫写诗人即将离开京城、前往宣城等边郡长久滞留,方字见出无奈与未然的怅惘——此刻尚在回望,而前路已是漫长的客居。这个词的深意,在于它把一次外放仕途的调动,写成了无期限的流放式漂泊,透露出谢朓在齐代政治倾轧中动辄得咎、去国怀乡的郁郁。它与怀哉罢欢宴紧承,去矣对怀哉,一写身之将去、一写心之眷恋,形成外与内、行与思的张力。滞淫一词渊源自《楚辞·九章》与《左传》的淹留、滞淫之语(如王粲《登楼赋》虽信美而非吾土兮,曾何足以少留),小谢化用以写望乡,遂使个人的宦途失意与千古的羁旅之悲交汇。二字平实,却重千钧,是读懂此诗身世之悲的一把钥匙。

Related Reading

登池上楼 Ascending the Tower by the Pool 谢灵运 · 同出谢氏山水一脉,大谢典重、小谢清丽 Related reading

Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.

谢灵运《登池上楼》(池塘生春草,园柳变鸣禽)与谢朓《晚登三山还望京邑》同写登山临水、由景及情,且都暗含去国仕隐的矛盾,世称大谢小谢,一脉相承。差异极鲜明:大谢诗典重繁密、结构铺排,多借《楚辞》典故与玄言尾巴(如祁祁伤豳歌,萋萋感楚吟),景中每带理障;小谢诗清丽省净、对仗工巧,以白日丽飞甍、澄江静如练的如画设色写活景物,且将身世之悲融于景中,不留玄言痕迹。就声律,大谢尚属古体,小谢已倡永明体、近唐律。合观二诗,可见山水诗由谢灵运的繁富典重,到谢朓的清远省净的演进轨迹——小谢正是对大谢的提炼与解放,而李白一生低首谢玄晖,实亦遥承这由大谢开启、小谢定型的山水抒情传统。

秋登宣城谢朓北楼 Climbing Xie Tiao's North Tower in Xuancheng on an Autumn Day 李白 · 李白直接致敬谢朓,唐律承小谢之脉 Related reading

Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.

李白《秋登宣城谢朓北楼》江城如画里,山晚望晴空;两水夹明镜,双桥落彩虹,是唐代诗人向谢朓最直接的致敬之作——诗题即标明谢朓北楼,诗中江城如画、山晚望晴的视角与设色,分明脱胎于《晚登三山还望京邑》的白日丽飞甍、澄江静如练。李白更在《金陵城西楼月下吟》中直呼解道澄江静如练,令人长忆谢玄晖,对一联倾倒备至。差异在时代与体式:谢诗为永明体过渡之作,十四句、古律之间;李诗为成熟七律,格律森严而气势更奔放。就情感,谢诗写去国望乡之悲,李诗写登楼怀古之旷,悲欢有别,而澄明如画的山水审美一脉相承。合观之,可见小谢如何在唐代被奉为山水诗鼻祖——李白的清发,正是对谢朓清丽一路的隔代回响,而澄江静如练遂成中国诗史上最被铭记的江水之喻。

登楼赋 Rhapsody on Ascending the Tower 王粲 · 谢诗望乡之悲的赋体源头,起句即用王粲典 Related reading

Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.

王粲《登楼赋》是东汉末年抒写去国怀乡、登临望乡之悲的赋体名篇(虽信美而非吾土兮,曾何足以少留),谢朓《晚登三山还望京邑》起句灞涘望长安即用王粲《七哀诗》南登霸陵岸,回首望长安之典,而全诗望乡泪下、谁能鬒不变的悲慨,正与王粲登楼销忧、望乡兴叹同一精神血脉。差异在文体与笔法:王粲以赋体铺陈、直抒块垒,悲慨淋漓;谢朓以诗体写景、前丽后哀,以乐景写哀,含蓄而深婉。二者恰构成望乡主题由赋到诗的演变——王粲把登楼望乡写成哀愤的赋,谢朓把它凝为清丽的诗,而小谢诗中对京邑飞甍、澄江的工笔,实亦王粲虽信美而非吾土之意的诗化。读谢诗当溯及王粲,方知这登楼望乡的悲音,自汉末已鸣,至小谢而益清。