All poems

先秦 Pre-Qin · 诗经 Classic of Poetry

伯兮

My Husband

诗经

Shijing

战争War 爱情Love 相思Longing

伯兮朅兮,邦之桀兮。
伯也执殳,为王前驱。
自伯之东,首如飞蓬。
岂无膏沐?
谁适为容!
其雨其雨,杲杲出日。
愿言思伯,甘心首疾。
焉得谖草?
言树之背。
愿言思伯,使我心痗。

O my husband, brave and tall,
He is the hero of the state.
With his spear in hand,
He is the vanguard for the king.

Since my husband went east,
My hair is like tangled thistle.
Not that I lack oil and cream,
But for whom should I adorn?

Rain, rain, I long for rain,
But the sun shines bright and hot.
I think of my husband with all my heart,
Willingly I suffer headache for him.

Where can I get the grass of forgetfulness?
I want to plant it behind the hall.
I think of my husband with all my heart,
It makes my heart ache.
Listen

Meaning

A wife expresses her deep longing for her husband who has gone to war as a vanguard for the king. She neglects her appearance, yearns for his return, and wishes for a forgetfulness plant to ease her sorrow.

我的丈夫真威武啊,他是邦国的英杰。丈夫手持长殳,为王师充当先锋。 自从丈夫东征去,我的头发乱如飞蓬。难道我没有润膏与香沐?可又为谁去修饰容颜! 盼下雨呀盼下雨,偏偏旭日朗朗升空。我念念不忘思念丈夫,甘愿为他愁苦头痛。 哪里能采到忘忧草?把它种在北堂之下。我念念不忘思念丈夫,叫他使我心病难痊。

Appreciation

The poem vividly portrays the wife's emotional journey from pride in her husband's bravery to despair and longing through straightforward narrative (赋) and vivid imagery, such as 'hair like thistle' and the rain-sun contrast.

【白话串讲】 丈夫出征,妻子在家:“自伯之东,首如飞蓬”——你走后,我的头发乱得像飞蓬。“岂无膏沐?谁适为容”——难道没有洗发膏?可我打扮给谁看?三千年前,一个妻子对出征丈夫的思念。 【意象与手法】 全诗四章,以赋法直陈、层层递进地铺写相思。首章「伯兮朅兮,邦之桀兮」先扬丈夫之英武,树立思念对象的崇高形象;次章「自伯之东,首如飞蓬。岂无膏沐?谁适为容」以「飞蓬」写容饰之乱、以反问写妆饰之无谓,痴情毕现;三章「其雨其雨,杲杲出日」以复沓祈盼与天象反衬写盼归不得的焦灼,「甘心首疾」以自虐式痴语写深情;末章「焉得谖草?言树之背」借忘忧草意象写求忘忧而不可得,「使我心痗」收束于病入膏肓的思念。四章由夸夫之傲到容悴之怨、由盼归之焦到痴病之深,每章末句皆以「伯」字收束,一唱三叹,心理刻画细腻动人。 【情感与主旨】 此诗为《卫风》思妇诗名篇,以征人之妻口吻,抒写丈夫「为王前驱」远征未归后,妻子独守空闺的刻骨相思。诗中「女为悦己者容」的痴情、「甘心首疾」的自虐、「使我心痗」的病思,层层写尽思妇由自豪到憔悴、由期盼到绝望的心理流程,既见其对丈夫的深挚专一,亦折射先秦征役制度下千家万户生离死别的悲苦,被誉为思妇诗之祖。 【名句点睛】 常考「谁适为容」的反问手法与「女为悦己者容」的情感内涵;「首如飞蓬」意象的生动性及其对后世闺怨诗的影响;「其雨其雨,杲杲出日」以天象写心理、情景相生的比兴之妙;「焉得谖草」忘忧草典故的出处与「求忘而愈不忘」的反衬效果;四章递进的情感层次与「伯」字收束的回环章法。

Background

This is a folk song from the Wei region during the pre-Qin period. It reflects the common situation of women waiting for their husbands conscripted for war. The husband's role as 'vanguard for the king' adds both glory and sorrow to the wife's longing.

《伯兮》为《诗经·卫风》名篇,一般认为作于西周晚期至春秋初年卫地。诗中「为王前驱」之「王」,旧说以为指周王,则丈夫是随王师出征的甲士,卫国地处中原,频遭戎狄之患,征役繁重,「伯」之出征当与当时的王事征伐有关。先秦战争以车战为主,甲士(执殳者)为军中骨干,「伯」身为「邦之桀兮」的英杰,执殳前驱,正是其时武士的典型形象。此诗的抒情主人公是征人之妻:丈夫远征未归,妻子独守空闺,容饰不修、相思成疾。这种「征役—思妇」的社会图景在《诗经》中屡见(《卷耳》《采薇》《君子于役》皆然),但《伯兮》以思妇口吻直赋相思,刻画之细腻、心理层次之分明,为同类作品之冠。毛诗序谓「刺时也,言君子行役,过时而不反」,虽以政教解诗,亦可见此诗反映的正是征人逾期不归的社会现实;后世论者多以之为「思妇诗之祖」,其对后世闺怨文学的影响至为深远。卫地即殷商故都朝歌一带,殷人重乐尚情,故《卫风》《邶风》《鄘风》中情诗特多,且多以女性口吻出之,《伯兮》正是这一地域文化土壤中孕育的名篇。

Art

The poem uses direct narrative (赋) with layered emotions: first praising the husband, then showing the wife's neglected appearance, then the frustration of unfulfilled expectations, and finally the wish for forgetfulness. Each stanza ends with 'husband' (伯), creating a refrain that deepens the emotional impact.

全诗四章,以女子口吻直赋相思,心理流程的刻画尤为细密,是《诗经》叙事抒情艺术的典范。首章先扬:「伯兮朅兮,邦之桀兮。伯也执殳,为王前驱。」连用「朅」「桀」「殳」「前驱」四词,把丈夫塑造成邦国英杰、王师先锋,自豪之情溢于言表——先立起思念对象的崇高形象,为后文的痴念蓄足情感。次章陡转:「自伯之东,首如飞蓬。岂无膏沐?谁适为容!」以「飞蓬」写容饰之乱,以「谁适为容」的反问写妆饰之无谓,所谓「女为悦己者容」,悦己者既去,膏沐何为?痴情与悲情并见。三章以「其雨其雨,杲杲出日」的天象起兴,盼雨而日出,愿望与现实背反,写尽盼归不得的焦灼,「甘心首疾」更以自虐式的痴语写甘愿相思成病的深情。四章借「焉得谖草?言树之背」的忘忧草意象,写求忘忧而不可得,「使我心痗」收束于病入膏肓的思念。四章由夸夫之傲而容悴之怨、而盼归之焦、而痴病之深,层层递进、一唱三叹,每章末句皆以「伯」字收束,回环往复,把思妇的深情写得既热烈又凄婉。

Allusions

The 'grass of forgetfulness' (谖草) refers to the daylily, believed to bring forgetfulness, originating the literary allusion of 'planting daylilies to forget sorrow'. 'Hair like flying thistle' (首如飞蓬) uses the simile of thistle to symbolize neglect. 'Spear' (殳) and 'vanguard' (前驱) are authentic Zhou dynasty military terms.

《伯兮》用典以植物意象为核心,最著者为「谖草」。「焉得谖草?言树之背」之「谖草」即萱草,古以为食之可以忘忧,故又名忘忧草,「谖」训忘。此二句是「萱草忘忧」典故的最早出处,《诗经》之后,嵇康《养生论》「合欢蠲忿,萱草忘忧」、王维「萱草出幽圃」、白居易「杜康能散闷,萱草解忘忧」皆承此脉;又因「言树之背」之「背」训北堂,北堂为母居之所,后世遂以「北堂萱」「萱堂」代指母亲,萱草由忘忧草演为慈母象征,其意象流变皆源于《伯兮》。「首如飞蓬」亦是影响深远的意象:飞蓬(蓬蒿遇风而飞)在《诗经》中本喻游子飘零(《曹风·蜉蝣》亦用),此处反用为思妇不修容饰之状,后世「首如飞蓬」「蓬头垢面」遂成形容女子无心妆饰的成语,唐张九龄「自君之出矣,不复理残机」等闺怨诗皆承此意。「岂无膏沐」之「膏沐」写脂粉洗发之具,「女为悦己者容」一语虽出《战国策》,其情实肇于此。至于「执殳」「前驱」,则实录周代车战甲士之制,可见征役背景之真切。

Commentary

Zhu Xi commented on the deep longing. Yao Jiheng called it 'the peak of foolish devotion'. Fang Yurun analyzed the psychological layers: from pride to sorrow to stubborn hope. Modern scholar Yu Guanying regarded it as the pioneer of boudoir lament poetry.

朱熹《诗集传》解此诗曰:「女以夫久从征役而不归,故思念之切如此。」平淡一语,而道出全诗情感之本。姚际恒《诗经通论》极赏其痴情,谓「情之痴绝,千古如新」,以为「首如飞蓬」数句写女子不事容饰之态,「写尽古今思妇」。方玉润《诗经原始》则条分其心理层次:「始则夸夫之勇,继则自伤其悴,终则愿言思伯,至死靡他」,四字一句的概括,道尽由傲而怨、由怨而痴的完整流程,为后世解读此诗定下基调。今人余冠英《诗经选》称此诗「开后世闺怨诗先声」,其说最得要领:诗中以「飞蓬」写容悴、以「其雨其雨」写盼归、以「谖草」写忘忧、以「心痗」写病思,诸般手法与意象,皆为后世闺怨诗(如张籍《征妇怨》、王昌龄《闺怨》)反复沿用,而此诗之质朴真挚,终非后来雕琢之作可及。就文学史而言,《伯兮》与《卷耳》《君子于役》并列为《国风》三大思妇诗,然《卷耳》以虚实对写见章法之巧,《君子于役》以黄昏鸡栖见意境之淡,《伯兮》独以直赋深情见痴态之真,三者合观,可见《诗经》思妇诗的多元成就。

Prosody

Form Shi Jing, Wei Feng (four-character meter)诗经·卫风(四言诗,乐歌)
Rhyme Stanza 1: 桀 and 驱 (Ge group); Stanza 2: 蓬 and 容 (Dong group); Stanza 3: 日 and 疾 (Zhi/Wei rhyme); Stanza 4: 背 and 痗 (Zhi group). Each stanza changes rhyme.四章换韵:首章朅、桀、驱(古音歌月部通押);二章东、蓬、容(东部);三章雨、日、疾(之质部通押,古音叶读);四章背、痗(之部)。重章换韵,一唱三叹。
Tone pattern Four-character lines with two-two rhythm, no strict tonal pattern (folk song based on music).四言二二节拍为主,兼用五言(岂无膏沐),长短错落;句末多用「兮」字语助,声情摇曳。
Reading note The folk song style uses repetitive structure to progressively express emotion.《伯兮》为《诗经·卫风》之篇,四言为主、二二节拍,是《国风》的标准体式,然其声情之妙,全在句式的长短变化与语助的运用。全诗四章,每章四句,章法齐整而章章换韵:首章押歌月部(朅、桀、驱),音色铿锵,正合夸夫之豪情;二章押东部(东、蓬、容),音色洪亮开阔,正合「自伯之东」的远行意象;三章之质通押(雨、日、疾),古音叶读,音色短促,正合盼归焦灼的节奏;四章押之部(背、痗),音色低沉,正合病思的沉郁。句法上,四言中偶杂五言(如「岂无膏沐」),又屡用「兮」字语助(伯兮朅兮、邦之桀兮),使整齐的四言生出摇曳之姿,如歌如叹。复沓手法尤为突出:「其雨其雨」叠词连用,「愿言思伯」三章、四章重复出现,一唱三叹,把思念的执著唱到极致。就声情关系而言,此诗以明朗的夸赞起调、以低回的病思收束,音调与情感同构,是《国风》中「以声写情」的典范,其复沓回环的章法亦对后世民歌(如《子夜歌》)深有影响。

Line by line

伯兮朅兮,邦之桀兮。

My lord, so brave and strong; he is the hero of the land.

我的丈夫多么威武雄壮,他是邦国中的英杰。

My husband is so valiant and strong, the hero of the whole land.

起句连用两个「兮」字,一唱三叹,是全诗夸夫之情的总起。「伯」为古代女子对丈夫的称呼,「朅」(qiè)训勇武健壮,「桀」通「杰」,谓才智出众。两句一气而下:先说丈夫体格之壮(朅),再说其才德之杰(桀),由外而内、由表及里,把思念对象塑造成邦国无双的英杰。值得注意的是,此诗以女子口吻写丈夫,却不写其温柔体贴,而专写其「执殳前驱」的武士英姿,可见先秦女子以夫之勇武为荣的价值观念,也见出思念的起点正是那份为国出征的骄傲。首章高高扬起,为后文「自伯之东」的跌落蓄势——夫越英杰,思念越深,容悴病思才越显其痴,起笔之扬正是全诗抑扬顿挫的枢纽。

The hero. My lord, so brave and strong; he is the hero of the land. The brave-strong and the hero-of-land are the praise. To have been brave would be a being; the my-lord-so-brave-and-strong-he-is-the-hero-of-the-land is the being.

自伯之东,首如飞蓬。岂无膏沐?谁适为容!

Since my lord went east, my head is like flying tumbleweed. Have I no hair-oil and wash? For whom should I make myself fair?

自从丈夫东征离去,我的头发乱得像飞蓬。难道没有脂膏香沐吗?可又为谁去打扮容颜呢!

Since my lord went east, my hair is like flying tumbleweed. Is it that I have no hair-oil and wash? For whom should I adorn myself?

次章是全诗情感转折的枢纽,由首章之扬骤然跌落。「自伯之东」点出征别之实,「首如飞蓬」以蓬草之乱写发髻之乱,形象鲜明如见:一个不事妆饰、形容憔悴的思妇立于目前。「岂无膏沐?谁适为容!」以反问自答,是全诗最动人的句子:脂膏香沐并非没有,只是悦己者已去,妆成又给谁看?「女为悦己者容」的深情,于此化为最朴素也最彻底的告白。此二句妙在以「有」衬「无」、以「不为」写「深爱」:膏沐之有无,本与相思无关,而女子偏以「不为谁容」自证其心,痴情毕现。后世「自君之出矣,明镜暗不治」(徐干)、「岂无膏沐,谁适为容」的化用不绝,足见此数句感染力之强,是《诗经》写情最见功力处之一。

The tumbleweed. Since my lord went east, my head is like flying tumbleweed. Have I no hair-oil and wash? For whom should I make myself fair? The lord-went-east-head-tumbleweed and the no-oil-wash-for-whom-fair are the turning. To have gone east would be a going; the since-my-lord-went-east-my-head-is-like-flying-tumbleweed-have-i-no-hair-oil-and-wash-for-whom-should-i-make-myself-fair is the going.

其雨其雨,杲杲出日。

Rain, O rain I cry; but the sun shines blindingly bright.

盼着下雨呀盼着下雨,偏偏一轮烈日朗朗地升上天空。

Rain, I long for rain—but the sun comes out, dazzling bright.

三章以「其雨其雨,杲杲出日」起兴,是全诗情景相生的妙笔。两句用复沓与反衬:一个「其」字连用,如口中念念有词,把盼雨的急切写得如在耳边;「杲杲」(gǎo gǎo)状日光明亮,盼雨而日出,愿望与现实的背离赤裸裸地呈现。此句之妙在以天象写心理:思妇盼夫归来,正如旱天盼雨,而「杲杲出日」则是愿望一次次的落空——日复一日,郎君不归,正如天不降雨。天象的偶然(晴雨)与人事的必然(不归)在此叠合,遂生出无可如何的怅惘。「甘心首疾」紧承其后:盼不到归期,甘愿因相思而头痛,把「痴」字写到自虐的地步。以盼雨喻盼归,是《诗经》比兴的传统,而此处的贴切自然,足为后世「以景写情」之法开山。

The sun. Rain, O rain I cry; but the sun shines blindingly bright. The rain-i-cry and the sun-shines-bright are the frustrated wish. To have cried for rain would be a crying; the rain-o-rain-i-cry-but-the-sun-shines-blindingly-bright is the crying.

焉得谖草?言树之背。

Where is the forget-worry herb? I will plant it at the north hall.

到哪里能找到忘忧草?把它种在北堂之下。

Where can I get the forget-sorrow herb? I will plant it by the north hall.

末章以「焉得谖草」设问起笔,是全诗「忘忧而愈忧」的绝望之笔。「谖草」即萱草,古以为食之忘忧;「焉得」二字,明知不可得而偏要一问,痴态可掬。「言树之背」谓种在北堂(后庭)之下,一个「树」(种植)字,把求忘忧的动作写得郑重其事——仿佛种下萱草,就能种下遗忘。然而忘忧草终究是虚妄的传说,种萱之举愈郑重,愈见其忧之不可排解,故结句「愿言思伯,使我心痗」直落于「痗」(病)字:忘忧无术,反而思之成病。此章之妙在以「求忘」写「不忘」:越是想要忘记,越是刻骨铭心,忘忧草的意象反衬出相思之不可愈,与「甘心首疾」的痴语前后呼应,把思妇推向病入膏肓的深情极致,是全诗情感的巅峰。

The herb. Where is the forget-worry herb? I will plant it at the north hall. The where-forget-worry-herb and the plant-north-hall are the close. To have planted it would be a planting; the where-is-the-forget-worry-herb-i-will-plant-it-at-the-north-hall is the planting.

Study

Word focus

朅 读qiè, means brave and tall; the first character sets the tone of the husband's martial bearing. 「伯兮朅兮」之「朅」(qiè)字,训勇武、健壮,是首章塑造丈夫英武形象的关键一字。此字在《诗经》中仅此一见(《伯兮》),属冷僻字而用得极有分量:它不写丈夫的容貌(那属「姝」「美」),不写其才具(那属「杰」),而专写其体魄之雄健、气势之凌厉,正合下句「执殳」「前驱」的武士身份。古注或训「朅」为「武貌」(毛传),或训「壮健貌」(朱熹),皆不离勇武之义;后世「朅」遂成为写武士英姿的专用字。此字之妙在于以音写形:「朅」音促而有力,开口一读,便有英武挺拔之感,与「兮」字的长音配合,一促一长,声情并茂。首句以「朅」定调,全诗对丈夫的夸赞、对思念的痴情,皆从此一字生发。
桀 通‘杰’, outstanding; it highlights the husband as the state's talent, showing the wife's pride. 「邦之桀兮」之「桀」字,通「杰」,训才智出众、超群绝伦,是首章「夸夫」的顶点。「邦之桀」谓邦国中的英杰,与「朅」之写武勇互补:朅写其形,桀写其才,形才兼备,则丈夫之形象臻于完美。古训「桀」本义为鸡栖木(高立之义),引申为特出、高出群伦(《说文》:「桀,磔也」引申为特立),故「桀」字天生带有「高出于众」的意味,用之写邦国之杰,恰到好处。「邦之桀兮」与「为王前驱」相承:正因为是邦国之杰,才得以执殳前驱、为王效力——夫之荣耀即妻之荣耀,此句是思妇自豪感的源头,也是后文「自伯之东」后思念愈深的根由。一个「桀」字,既写丈夫之才,更见思妇眼中「情人眼里出英杰」的深情,一字而双情并见。
适 读dí, meaning 'for' or 'to'; in the rhetorical question '谁适为容', it emphasizes that she only adorns for her husband. 「谁适为容」之「适」(dí)字,训「主」,谓为主、为着,「谁适为容」即「为谁而容」的倒装强调,是全诗痴情最集中的一字。古训「适」为主(《郑笺》:「适,主也」),「谁适为容」犹言「谁为主而修饰容仪」——「适」字把「为谁」的疑问推向极致,含着一层执拗的自我剖白:这容貌本是为你而修饰的,你既不在,修饰便失了意义。此字之妙有三:其一,以倒装句法突出「谁」字,语气由平叙转为质问,情感力度大增;其二,「适」训主,暗含「君为吾容之主」的专一,妆饰只为一人,痴情见诸词法;其三,与「岂无膏沐」呼应,有膏沐而无适容之主,物质之备反衬情感之空,以有衬无,愈见其苦。「适」之一字,是理解全诗「女为悦己者容」深情的钥匙。

Related Reading

卷耳 The Cocklebur 诗经 · 同为《国风》思妇念征人名篇,一为虚实对写一为直赋 Same (theme: wife missing her soldier husband) / Different (technique: 'Juan'er' uses contrast of real and imaginary, while 'Boxi' uses direct narrative from the wife's perspective)

Both are famous poems about longing wives in the 'Guofeng' section; compare their lyrical perspectives and structural differences.

《卷耳》写思妇采卷耳而怀远人,中间忽转征人之口吻写其登高饮酒、马瘏仆痡,虚实对写、双线并进,章法奇幻;《伯兮》则纯以思妇口吻直赋,从夸夫、容悴、盼归到病思,一线到底,心理流程完整。二者相较,《卷耳》之妙在结构之巧(两线交错、时空跳跃),《伯兮》之妙在情感之真(痴态层层递进);《卷耳》含蓄(思而不言其思),《伯兮》奔放(直写「甘心首疾」)。同为《国风》思妇诗双璧,一以章法胜、一以深情胜,恰可见《诗经》在同一题材下的多元写法,对读最见中国抒情诗早期的艺术自觉。

采薇 Gathering the Vetch 诗经 · 同为战争徭役题材,一写征人自叹一写思妇相思,合观战争之两面 Same (subject: war and conscription causing separation) / Different (perspective: 'Caiwei' from the soldier's view, 'Boxi' from the wife's view)

One expresses the soldier's sorrow on the way home, the other the wife's longing at home; together they show both sides of war.

《采薇》以征人第一人称自述「靡室靡家,猃狁之故」,写尽戍边之苦、归途之悲,末章「昔我往矣,杨柳依依。今我来思,雨雪霏霏」更以今昔景物对照写尽沧桑;《伯兮》则从思妇一侧落笔,写征人身后空闺的等待与病思。二诗一写征人、一写思妇,恰好构成战争对家庭的双向撕裂:征人在外「载饥载渴」,思妇在内「首如飞蓬」,同一场战争的两端皆苦。情感上,《采薇》悲而能达(「莫知我哀」),《伯兮》痴而愈苦(「使我心痗」);艺术上,《采薇》以时序推进、情景对照胜,《伯兮》以直赋深情、复沓回环胜。合观二诗,可见《诗经》战争诗已具备完整的双向视角,其对战争苦难的揭示之深,为后世边塞诗、闺怨诗确立了基本格局。

静女 The Quiet Maiden 诗经 · 同为《诗经》爱情题材,一写欢会甜蜜一写别后哀苦 Same (love theme) / Different (mood: 'Jingnv' is joyful meeting, 'Boxi' is sorrowful separation)

Compare the different emotional tones in the Book of Songs' love poems.

《静女》写「静女其姝,俟我于城隅」的幽期密约,「彤管」「荑」传情,通篇洋溢着欢会调笑的天真烂漫;《伯兮》则写征人别后的空闺相思,容悴病思、缠绵哀苦。二诗一写相聚之乐、一写别离之哀,恰好构成《诗经》爱情诗情感光谱的两端:相聚时「搔首踟蹰」的娇痴,与别离后「首如飞蓬」的憔悴,同是痴情,一乐一苦。艺术上,《静女》以物传情(彤管、荑)、以动作写心(搔首踟蹰),明丽轻快;《伯兮》以意象写愁(飞蓬、谖草)、以反问写心(谁适为容),沉郁凄婉。二诗对读,可见先秦男女爱情既有个体欢愉的自由,亦有征役离别的悲苦,其现实主义的丰富面向,正是《诗经》爱情诗超越后世「才子佳人」模式之处。