All poems

清 Qing · 诗 Poem

寰海十章·其九

Vast Sea, Ten Songs (Ninth)

魏源

Wei Yuan

爱国patriotism 讽喻satire 咏史History

寰海十章·其九城上旌旗城下盟，怒潮已作落潮声。
阴疑阳战玄黄血，电挟雷攻水火并。
鼓角岂真天上降，琛珠合向海王倾。
全凭宝气销兵气，此夕蛟宫万丈明。

On the wall fly banners, beneath the wall a treaty;
The angry tide has become the ebb-tide's sound.
Yin doubts, yang wars, dark-yellow blood;
Lightning bears thunder, water and fire join.
Were the drums and horns truly dropped from heaven?
Pearls and treasures should pour to the sea-king.
All by treasure-breath to melt the war-breath;
This night the dragon-palace shines ten thousand fathoms bright.

Listen

Meaning

Above the city wall still fly the generals' banners, yet beneath the wall a humiliating treaty is signed; the tide of resistance has become the sound of the retreating tide. Yin and yang doubt, dragons war, dark-yellow blood; lightning bears thunder, water and fire join. Were those heaven-shaking drums and horns truly dropped from heaven? Pearls and treasures should pour to the sea-power. All by relying on gold and jewels to melt away the breath of war; tonight that dragon-palace is lit ten thousand fathoms bright.

城头还飘着将帅的旌旗，城下却已签订屈辱盟约，抗敌的怒潮早化作退落的潮声。阴阳相疑、龙血玄黄，电挟雷攻、水火交并。那震天鼓角难道真是天上降下？珍宝珠琛正该向海上强权倾倒。全靠着金银财宝去销弭兵戈之气，今夜那蛟宫被照得万丈通明。

Appreciation

The first couplet 'On the wall banners, beneath the wall a treaty' exposes the absurd by juxtaposition: the generals still raise banners, yet beneath the wall already beg for peace; 'angry tide, ebb tide' metaphors the people's wrath of resistance turning into the stillness of humiliation. The middle two couplets write the battle's grimness and the authorities' sophistry of 'heaven-sent troops'. The closing 'all by treasure-breath to melt the war-breath' is cold irony, directly stabbing the shame of buying peace with bribes. The antithesis is strict, the imagery strange and towering, history-brush and poetic heart one—writing a 'poem-history' like contemporary record within the seven-character lü.

【白话串讲】鸦片战争后，魏源写《寰海十章》：“城上旌旗城下盟，怒潮已作落潮声”——城上还在升旗，城下已经签了屈辱的条约。“全凭宝气销兵气”——他痛心，这个国家要靠赔款来“销兵气”。【意象与手法】首联「城上旌旗城下盟」以对举揭穿荒唐：将帅犹张旗，城下已乞和；「怒潮落潮」喻民心抗敌之愤转为屈辱之静。中二联写战守惨烈与当局「天降神兵」之诡辩。尾联「全凭宝气销兵气」冷峭反语，直刺赂敌之耻。对仗精严，意象奇崛，史笔与诗心合一。【情感与主旨】魏源（1794—1857），近代启蒙思想家。道光二十一年（1841）广州之战，靖逆将军奕山兵败，与英订《广州和约》，赎城赔款。魏源愤而作《寰海十章》，此其九专刺奕山「城下盟」之辱与以贿求和之谬，是近代反侵略爱国诗的代表，亦见其「师夷长技以制夷」主张背后的沉痛时局认知。【名句点睛】中高考或取：①理解「城上旌旗城下盟」的讽刺意涵；②赏析「怒潮已作落潮声」的比喻；③体会「宝气销兵气」的反语之妙。

Background

Wei Yuan (1794-1857), early-modern enlightenment thinker. In the twenty-first year of Daoguang (1841) at the Guangzhou battle, the 'General Who Quells Rebellion' Yishan was defeated and signed the 'Guangzhou Treaty' with Britain, ransoming the city with indemnity. Wei Yuan, angered, wrote 'Ten Poems on the Vast Sea' (also 'Later Ten Poems on the Vast Sea'); this ninth specifically stabs the shame of Yishan's 'treaty beneath the wall' and the folly of buying peace with bribes—a representative of early-modern anti-aggression patriotic poetry, both recording and satirising, also showing the painful times-awareness behind his 'learn the barbarians' skills to control the barbarians' stance.

魏源（1794—1857），字默深，湖南邵阳人，清代思想家、文学家，与龚自珍并称「龚魏」，主张「师夷长技以制夷」，著有《海国图志》《圣武记》等，是近代开眼看世界的先驱。道光二十一年（1841）五月，英国侵略军进攻广州，清将奕山（靖逆将军）昏聩无能，一战即溃，遂与英军订立《广州和约》，允缴赎城费六百万元，英军退出虎门。魏源时在浙东军中，闻讯愤极，作《寰海》十章（又作《寰海后十章》）纪其事，此其九专刺奕山「城下盟」之辱与以贿求和之谬。诗中「城上旌旗城下盟」直写城头尚张旗而城下已订降约的荒唐，「全凭宝气销兵气」冷峭反语，刺赂敌求安之耻。此诗将重大史实入七律对仗，记事与讽谕兼具，是近代反侵略爱国诗的代表，也是鸦片战争「诗史」书写的重要一环。魏源此诗之作，尚有更深的时代背景：鸦片战争爆发后，清廷「和战不定」，主和派（琦善、奕山等）以赔款求和，主战派（林则徐、邓廷桢等）反遭革职，魏源曾入两江总督裕谦幕府参与浙东抗英，亲见「防夷」之弊，故其诗不徒为一人一事而发，实刺「和战失策」的全局。又魏源主张「师夷长技以制夷」，而其《寰海》十章多写败辱，正见其「知耻而后勇」的清醒——此诗「鼓角岂真天上降」一问，正是对「洋人不可敌」的迷信的破除；「宝气销兵气」的反语，则是对「以贿求和」路线的彻底否定，其批判深度已超出一般爱国诗而进入战略反思的层面。

Art

The first couplet 'On the wall banners, beneath the wall a treaty' exposes the absurd by juxtaposition: the generals still raise banners, yet beneath the wall already beg for peace; 'angry tide, ebb tide' metaphors the people's wrath of resistance turning into the stillness of humiliation. The middle two couplets write the battle's grimness and the authorities' sophistry of 'heaven-sent troops'. The closing 'all by treasure-breath to melt the war-breath' is cold irony, directly stabbing the shame of buying peace with bribes. The antithesis is strict, the imagery strange and towering, history-brush and poetic heart one—writing a 'poem-history' of contemporary record within the seven-character lü.

首联「城上旌旗城下盟，怒潮已作落潮声」以对举揭穿荒唐：城上将帅犹张旌旗、貌似雄壮，城下却已订下屈辱盟约；「怒潮已作落潮声」以潮水为喻，写民众抗敌之怒潮已化为退落之潮声，民心士气尽付东流。颔联「阴疑阳战玄黄血，电挟雷攻水火并」写战事之惨烈：以《易》之「阴疑于阳必战」写敌我交兵，玄黄之血遍野，炮火如电雷水火交并，意象奇崛、声势骇人。颈联「鼓角岂真天上降，琛珠合向海王倾」两问一讽：鼓角之声岂真是天兵下降？意谓英军并非不可敌，败在当局之无能；琛珠（珍宝）却合该向「海王」（海上霸王，指英国）倾泻，反语刺赂敌之耻。尾联「全凭宝气销兵气，此夕蛟宫万丈明」以「宝气销兵气」的反语收束——靠赔款珠宝销弭兵戈，今夜敌军舟舰（蛟宫）被照得万丈通明，冷嘲入骨。全诗对仗精严、意象奇崛，史笔与诗心合一，于七律之中写出「诗史」般的当代实录。

Allusions

'Dark-yellow blood' from the Book of Changes: 'Dragons war in the wild; their blood is dark-yellow'—metaphors yin-yang war, blood over the field, here meaning the battle's grimness; 'sea-king' originally means the overlord of the seas, here borrowed for the British aggressor; 'dragon-palace' means the sea-dragon's palace, metaphor for the enemy fleet's mooring. The allusions are all ancient, used to write the modern times, describing strange shame in elegant language—in the contrast shows deep pain, also showing his scholar's nature of bringing classics and history into poetry, using the ancient to mirror the present.

「城下盟」用《左传》「城下之盟」之典（《桓公十二年》：「楚伐绞……大败之，为城下之盟而还」），指敌军兵临城下被迫签订的屈辱盟约，此处直指《广州和约》。「阴疑阳战」出《周易·坤卦》文言「阴疑于阳，必战……其血玄黄」，本指阴阳二气交争，喻战事流血，此处写两军血战；「玄黄血」即「龙战于野，其血玄黄」，以经语状战祸惨烈。「海王」本指海上霸王（《管子》「海王之国」），此借指英国侵略势力。「蛟宫」谓海底龙宫，喻敌舰盘踞之所。所引皆古语而写近代时局，以雅语状奇辱，反差中见沉痛，亦显魏源以经史入诗、借古喻今的学人本色。就「经史入诗」的传统而言，魏源承杜甫「以时事入诗」与江西派「点铁成金」的余绪，而更有近代色彩：《周易》「阴疑于阳必战」、《左传》「城下之盟」、《管子》「海王」等经史语汇，皆被赋予鸦片战争的当代义涵，以雅语状奇辱，正是「旧瓶装新酒」的近代化尝试；其「蛟宫」之喻，则暗合《史记·秦始皇本纪》海神传说与李商隐「鲛人泣珠」的典故，以神话意象写敌舰，既见奇想，又见忧愤。全诗用典不僻不滥，皆切时势，正见近代诗人「以学问为诗」而「以经世为归」的特点。

Commentary

This poem is a famous 'poem-history' of the early modern, with Bei Qingqiao's 'Click-Click Hum' together. A modern says Wei Yuan 'writes poetry with a statecraft brush, opening the first of the Tongguang poetic revolution'; his putting great history into seven-character lü antithesis, cold and sharp, is a model of patriotic satire, influencing later salvation poetry tides far. A first voice of the early-modern 'poem-history' spirit.

此诗为近代「诗史」名篇，与贝青乔《咄咄吟》并称鸦片战争诗史双璧。近人钱仲联《清诗纪事》谓魏源「以经世之笔为诗，开晚清诗界革命之先声」；其将当代史实写入七律对仗，冷讽峻切，足为爱国讽谕诗之范式。就清诗史而言，魏源与龚自珍皆以「经世致用」为诗学主张，龚诗奇诡、魏诗沉实，各极其致；此诗「怒潮已作落潮声」「宝气销兵气」等句，以喻写史、以反语刺政，为近代救亡诗潮（如黄遵宪、康有为诗）开辟了道路。诗中「师夷长技」未见而「以贿求和」已现，恰是鸦片战争时期「闭关自守—丧权辱国」恶性循环的文学记录，其批判锋芒与史料价值至今仍有现实意义。就近代文学史而言，此诗与龚自珍《己亥杂诗》、黄遵宪《悲平壤》等并列为「近代爱国诗」的先声，其「以诗纪当代战事、以诗议国家大计」的写法，上承杜甫「诗史」精神，下启「诗界革命」诸家；钱仲联《梦苕盦诗话》谓魏源「以经世之笔为诗，多纪鸦片战争时事，可当诗史读」，正指此类作品。此诗「怒潮已作落潮声」「宝气销兵气」等句，更成为近代「国耻书写」的经典语汇，被《清诗纪事》《近代诗钞》等反复收录；今人读此诗，不仅能感受诗人激愤，更能通过诗史互证，认识鸦片战争时期清廷「和战失据」的历史教训，其思想价值与史料价值俱为近代诗之冠冕。

Prosody

Form Seven-character regulated poem (seven-character lü)七言律诗

Rhyme Ping-shui rhyme, lower-level eight geng group (treaty, sound, join, pour, bright)平水韵·下平八庚（盟、声、并、倾、明），首句入韵

Tone pattern First line enters rhyme, level-onset first-line-enters-rhyme平起首句入韵，中二联对仗（颔联、颈联）

Reading note Middle two couplets strict antithesis, writes as history-brush.此诗为七言律诗，押平水韵下平八庚韵，「盟、声、并、倾、明」一韵到底，韵脚（eng）洪亮沉雄，正合诗中的战事惨烈与忧愤沉痛。格律上首句「城上旌旗城下盟」平起入韵，中二联对仗精严：颔联「阴疑阳战玄黄血，电挟雷攻水火并」——「阴疑」对「电挟」、「阳战」对「雷攻」、「玄黄血」对「水火并」，词性结构工稳而意象奇崛，以经语写战事、以自然喻炮火，对仗中见出其以史入诗的功力；颈联「鼓角岂真天上降，琛珠合向海王倾」——「鼓角」对「琛珠」、「岂真」对「合向」、「天上降」对「海王倾」，一问一讽，对仗精严而含锋棱。七律体制严整，最宜沉郁顿挫的讽谕，魏源此作严守格律而气格雄直：首联揭辱定调，颔联写战拓展，颈联反问深刺，尾联反语收束，起承转合井然，正是七律「以整饬之体写激愤之情」的典范。就诗体史而言，晚清诗人以旧体写新事（鸦片战争、洋务等），魏源此诗开其端，其「以经史入七律、以反语刺时政」的写法，直接影响了黄遵宪「我手写我口」的诗界革命，是古典律诗在近代的转型之作。

Line by line

城上旌旗城下盟，怒潮已作落潮声。

On the city walls flutter the banners; beneath the walls, the treaty is signed. The angry tide has already turned to the murmur of the ebbing flood.

城头还飘着将帅的旌旗，城下却已签订屈辱盟约，抗敌的怒潮早化作退落的潮声。

On the city walls the generals still fly their banners, yet beneath the walls a shameful treaty has already been signed; the angry tide of resistance has long since turned into the sound of the ebbing flood.

首联以对举揭穿荒唐，是全诗讽刺的起点。「城上旌旗」写城头将帅犹张旌旗、貌似雄壮，战旗高扬、虚张声势；「城下盟」写城下却已签订屈辱盟约——「城下盟」用《左传》「城下之盟」之典，指兵临城下被迫订约，一上一下、一旗一盟，将帅的虚骄与败降的耻辱并置，荒唐立见。「怒潮已作落潮声」以潮水为喻——抗敌的怒潮本应汹涌，如今却已化作退落的潮声，民心士气尽付东流，沉痛在喻。两句一写假象、一写真况，对举见义，冷讽之笔直指当局。

The opening couplet exposes the absurdity through contrast, the starting point of the poem's satire. On the city walls flutter the banners writes how the commanders still spread their banners on the wall, seeming mighty, the war flags raised, a bluff of show; beneath the walls, the treaty is signed uses the Zuozhuan allusion to a treaty signed beneath the walls, a peace forced on a beleaguered city — one above, one below, one banner, one treaty: the commanders' empty pride and the shame of surrender set side by side, the absurdity at once visible. The angry tide has already turned to the murmur of the ebbing flood uses the tide as metaphor: the angry tide of resistance should have surged, yet now it has turned into the sound of the ebbing flood, popular will and fighting spirit all poured away to the east, the sorrow within the metaphor. One line writes the false show, one the real state; the contrast reveals the meaning, and the cold satire points straight at the authorities.

阴疑阳战玄黄血，电挟雷攻水火并。

When yin doubts yang and they do battle, the field runs dark-yellow blood; lightning bears the thunderclap, and fire and water join their force.

阴阳相疑、龙血玄黄，电挟雷攻、水火交并。

Yin and yang stand at odds and battle, and blood runs dark and yellow over the plain; lightning carries the thunderbolt, and fire and water join in assault.

写战事之惨烈，以经语状现代炮火，是全诗意象最奇崛的一联。「阴疑阳战」用《周易》「阴疑于阳，必战」——本写阴阳交争，此处喻敌我交兵，以经语写时事；「玄黄血」出「龙战于野，其血玄黄」，写两军血战、流血遍野，惨烈之状如在目前。「电挟雷攻水火并」写炮火之猛烈——炮弹如电挟雷、水师火器交并，以自然界的雷电水火状现代战争的火力，意象奇崛、声势骇人。两句一写血战之惨、一写炮火之烈，将广州之役的惨败写得惊心动魄，也为下联「鼓角岂真天上降」的讽刺蓄势。

The couplet writes the ferocity of the war, describing modern gunfire in the language of the classics, the strangest imagery of the poem. When yin doubts yang and they do battle transforms the Book of Changes line, yin, doubting yang, must fight; originally of the strife of yin and yang, here it figures the clash of foe and friend, writing current events in classical language. The field runs dark-yellow blood comes from the dragon fights in the wild, its blood dark and yellow, writing the two armies' bloody struggle, the blood over the plain, the carnage as before the eyes. Lightning carries the thunderbolt, and fire and water join their force writes the fury of the cannon: shells like lightning bearing thunder, naval firepower and firearms joining, the thunder, lightning, fire and water of nature used to figure the fire of modern war, the imagery strange and the clamor appalling. Two lines: the horror of bloody struggle, the fury of gunfire, writing the disaster of the Guangzhou campaign heart-stirring, and storing force for the satire of the drums and trumpets truly dropped from heaven that follows.

鼓角岂真天上降，琛珠合向海王倾。

Were those drums and trumpets truly dropped from heaven? Tribute pearls, it seems, ought to be poured out to the Sea King.

那震天鼓角难道真是天上降下？珍宝珠琛正该向海上强权倾倒。

Did those earth-shaking drums and trumpets truly descend from heaven? Precious pearls and tribute gifts must be poured out to the Sea King.

一讽一刺，是全诗批判锋芒最锐利的一联。「鼓角岂真天上降」以反问揭穿诡辩——当局败后或诡称英军「天降神兵」、非人力可敌，诗人反问：鼓角之声岂真是天上降下？英军不过是寻常之敌，败在无能而非天命，一「岂」字戳破托词；「琛珠合向海王倾」以反语写赂敌之耻——「海王」指海上霸王英国，「合向」即「合该、应当」，本应御敌之珍宝，如今竟合该向敌人倾倒，正话反说，讥刺入骨。两句一问一讽，将当局「畏敌如神、赂敌求安」的丑态揭露无遗，愤慨淋漓。

One challenge, one irony, the couplet of the poem's sharpest critical edge. Were those drums and trumpets truly dropped from heaven? exposes the sophistry in a rhetorical question: after defeat, the authorities claimed the British were godsent soldiers, beyond human power; the poet asks, did the sound of drums and trumpets truly fall from heaven? The British are but ordinary foes; defeat lies in incompetence, not fate, and the single word did pierces the excuse. Tribute pearls, it seems, ought to be poured out to the Sea King writes the shame of bribing the enemy in irony: Sea King means the ocean tyrant Britain; ought to means should, what should have been the treasures for withstanding the foe now ought to be poured out to the enemy, praise spoken as blame, the mockery to the bone. Two lines, one question one irony, laying bare the ugly sight of the authorities who feared the foe like a god and bribed him for peace, indignation pouring forth.

全凭宝气销兵气，此夕蛟宫万丈明。

It is all by the gleam of treasure that the clang of arms is quenched; tonight, the dragon palace glows ten thousand fathoms bright.

全靠着金银财宝去销弭兵戈之气，今夜那蛟宫被照得万丈通明。

It is entirely by the glitter of treasure that the clangor of arms is pacified; tonight the dragon palace is lit up ten thousand fathoms bright.

以反语收束全篇，冷嘲入骨，是近代讽喻诗的经典结穴。「全凭宝气销兵气」写全凭赔款珠宝去销弭兵戈——「宝气」指赎城赔款的财宝，「兵气」指敌军的兵戈，以财宝销兵戈，即割地赔款以求和，正话反说，冷峭之至；「此夕蛟宫万丈明」写今夜敌舰被照得万丈通明——「蛟宫」以海底龙宫喻敌舰盘踞之所，赔款之宝车载船运、灯火通明，恰似照亮相赠，讽刺之意不言自明。此联以「宝气销兵气」的反语、「蛟宫万丈明」的奇喻收束，将丧权辱国之耻凝于冷嘲之中，沉痛与愤慨并出，正是「诗史」之笔的极致。

The close ends the poem in irony, cold mockery to the bone, the classic resolution of modern satirical verse. It is all by the gleam of treasure that the clangor of arms is pacified writes how the indemnity jewels alone quench the weapons: gleam of treasure means the ransom money for the city, clangor of arms the enemy's arms; pacifying arms with treasure means ceding territory and paying indemnity for peace, praise spoken as blame, cold to the extreme. Tonight the dragon palace glows ten thousand fathoms bright writes how the enemy ships are lit up ten thousand fathoms bright: the dragon palace figures the lair of the anchored fleet, the indemnity treasure carted and shipped, the lanterns bright as if lit for the gift, the satire self-evident. The couplet closes on the irony of treasure's gleam quenching arms' clangor and the strange image of the dragon palace glowing ten thousand fathoms, condensing the shame of lost sovereignty into cold mockery, sorrow and indignation together, the extreme of poetry-as-history.

Study

Word focus

城下盟 A treaty forced after defeat—directly stabs the shame of losing rights and humiliating the state. 「城下盟」用《左传》「城下之盟」之典，指敌军兵临城下被迫签订的屈辱盟约，是全诗直刺时政的核心语汇。「城下」写敌军兵临城下、威逼订约之辱，「盟」本指平等之盟，与「城下」连用，则盟约已失其平等之义，沦为城下之辱——以古语写今事，一字一典而耻辱自现。此词与「城上旌旗」对举，城上犹张旗、城下已订盟，将帅之虚骄与败降之耻辱并置，讽刺之意不言自明。魏源以经史入诗、借古讽今，此词正是其「以雅语状奇辱」的典型，千载之下读之，犹觉字字如刺。

怒潮落潮 Metaphor: the people's wrath of resistance turning into the stillness of humiliation, deep and painful. 「怒潮已作落潮声」之「怒潮落潮」，以潮水的涨落比喻民心的盛衰，是全诗最见沉痛的比喻。「怒潮」写民众抗敌之愤——如怒潮汹涌、不可阻挡，正是民心可用之时；「已作落潮声」写其转为退落——「已作」写既成事实，抗敌之怒潮竟已化作退落之潮声，潮落声微，民心士气尽付东流。「怒」与「落」对举，一涨一落、一愤一衰，将「民心可恃而当局不战」的悲剧写得形象可感。此喻以潮水写民心，取象自然、含蕴深广，正见魏源炼喻之精，也可见其「以诗存史」的沉痛用心。

宝气销兵气 Irony: satirises ransoming the enemy with indemnity, vainly seeking peace by flattering the foreign. 「全凭宝气销兵气」之「宝气销兵气」，以「宝」「兵」二字对举、反语见义，是全诗最冷峭的一笔。「宝气」指赔款赎城的财宝，「兵气」指敌军的兵戈之气，以财宝销弭兵戈，本无此理，而当局竟「全凭」此策——正话反说，讽刺之意不言自明：兵气非宝气所能销，赂敌求安实为养痈遗患。「宝」「兵」二字声近形异，连读铿锵，音节上亦见匠心；「销」字写以宝易安，轻描淡写中见出当局的荒唐与诗人的痛愤，正是反语艺术的极致，也是近代爱国诗讽刺手法的典范。