All poems

清 Qing · 诗 Poem

杂诗

Miscellaneous Poem

龚自珍（清）

Gong Zizhen

赋税之弊Taxation Malady 民生讽喻Satire on People's Livelihood

不论盐铁不筹河，独倚东南涕泪多。
国赋三升民一斗，屠牛那不胜栽禾。

Neither salt nor iron is debated, nor river works are planned,
Alone I lean toward the southeast, where tears and grief expand.
The state's tax is three sheng, yet the people yield one dou—
Is not butchering the ox better than planting grain anew?

Listen

Meaning

This short poem attacks the Qing government's neglect of vital statecraft—salt and iron revenues, flood control—and its brutal taxation that forces peasants to abandon farming. With sharp numerical contrast, Gong Zizhen exposes the gap between nominal and actual burdens, concluding bitterly that killing one's plow ox is preferable to planting crops under such extortion.

既不议论盐铁之利，也不筹谋河工治水，独自倚望东南，禁不住涕泪横流。国家的赋税名义上不过三升，百姓实际却要交出整整一斗，农夫宁可宰牛弃地，又岂非胜过辛苦种田。

Appreciation

The poem is a seven-character quatrain that combines political diagnosis with emotional outcry. The opening pair of negations ('neither...nor') highlights official inaction, while 'alone leaning southeast' reveals the poet's solitary grief. The final couplet uses a startling arithmetic contrast—three sheng versus one dou—to unmask the reality of exorbitant levies, and the rhetorical question about slaughtering the ox conveys the absurdity of rural ruin with devastating irony.

【白话串讲】 “不论盐铁不筹河，独倚东南涕泪多”——龚自珍写杂诗：朝廷不理财不治河。“国赋三升民一斗，屠牛那不胜栽禾”——国家收三升，百姓交一斗，还不如杀牛种地。他写晚清民生的凋敝。【意象与手法】首句“不论盐铁不筹河”连用盐铁、河工两大国计点出当局根本之政尽废；次句“独倚东南涕泪多”写忧民之痛；后两句“国赋三升民一斗，屠牛那不胜栽禾”以触目惊心的数字对比揭示重敛之下农民宁可弃农的荒诞。语言质朴直白，以数字对比制造强烈反差，继承白居易新乐府现实主义精神。【情感与主旨】写晚清民生凋敝、赋税繁重，聚焦农政与赋敛之失，是研究近代社会危机与龚自珍民本思想的重要文本。以诗为史，将沉重赋税凝为二十八字，忧世之心与批判锋芒与杜甫、白居易一脉相承。【名句点睛】常考“国赋三升民一斗，屠牛那不胜栽禾”以数字对比写重敛之下弃农；“不论盐铁不筹河，独倚东南涕泪多”以国计尽废写忧民。

Background

Composed during the Daoguang reign (1820–1850), the poem reflects the so-called 'decline of Jiaqing and Daoguang,' a period of administrative corruption, fiscal crisis, silver outflow, and rural impoverishment. Gong Zizhen (1792–1841), a pioneering reformist thinker, often used poetry to critique contemporary ills. Here he focuses on agricultural taxation and neglected water conservancy, continuing his lifelong concern for the people's suffering. To understand the poem, one must know that 'salt and iron' and 'river works' were core policies of state revenue and irrigation/shipping from Han times on; the poet's complaint that the court 'does not discuss, does not plan' them indicts fundamental governance failure.

此诗约作于道光年间，时值清廷内政积弊、民生凋敝、白银外流、赋税繁重，史称「嘉道中衰」。龚自珍作为近代早期主张更法革新的思想家，常以诗笔直刺时弊。这首杂诗即聚焦农政与赋敛之失，延续了他关心民瘼的一贯主张。要理解此诗，须先看清代中期的财政与农村危机。所谓「盐铁」「河工」，是自汉代桑弘羊、历代王朝都视为国计命脉的两大要政：盐铁关乎财政收入，河工关乎农田水利与漕运安危。可诗中却说当局「不论盐铁不筹河」——不是忙于这些根本之政，而是根本不议论、不筹谋，任其废弛。与此同时，东南（赋税重地）的百姓却在重敛下涕泪横流。更触目者是后两句的「数字对比」：国家明文赋税仅「三升」，百姓实际却要交出「一斗」，相差逾三倍；重敛之下，农夫宁可宰牛弃地、不再种田。这正是小农经济在重赋与吏胥盘剥下走向破产的真实缩影。龚自珍以诗为史，把沉重的时代病症，凝进二十八个字。读懂了这层背景，才明白它为何能与《己亥杂诗》的昂扬呼告互补——一个从正面求人才，一个从反面揭民瘼，同是「更法」思想的双翼。

Art

The poem's artistry lies in the stark numerical contrast and unadorned realism, inheriting Bai Juyi's New Yuefu spirit of 'writing for events, singing for the people's ills.' The repeated 'not' in the first line sets up official neglect; the 'alone' and 'many tears' project the poet's solitary empathy. The pair 'three sheng / one dou' is a chilling factual exposure of nominal versus real taxation, while the rhetorical question 'is it not better to butcher the ox' turns a peasant's desperate calculus into a devastating social verdict. Plain language, no allusions, yet the power of arithmetic and logic carries the critique.

这首诗的艺术，全在「以数字对比制造反差」与「以白描直刺时弊」两处，继承了白居易新乐府「为事而作、惟歌生民病」的现实主义精神。首句「不论盐铁不筹河，独倚东南涕泪多」，以两个「不」字排开，先点出当局废弛根本之政，再以「独倚东南涕泪多」收束，写诗人独自倚望赋税重地、禁不住涕泪横流——「独」字见孤独，「涕泪多」见痛切，一个忧国诗人的形象立现。后两句「国赋三升民一斗，屠牛那不胜栽禾」，是千古讽刺的利器：用「三升」与「一斗」的悬殊数字，揭穿「名义轻赋、实际重敛」的骗局；再以「屠牛那不胜栽禾」的反诘，写农夫宁毁生计也不愿再种——种田反不如宰牛，这是何等荒诞的农村现实。全诗语言质朴直白，不尚雕饰，不使典故，却因数字的冷峻与反诘的尖锐而力量自见。它不以形象取胜，而以事实与逻辑取胜，是近代「诗史」精神在讽喻小诗中的典型体现，亦开后来诗界革命「我手写我口」之先声。

Allusions

Though the poem is mostly plainspoken, its opening terms 'salt and iron' and 'river works' invoke a long economic-history tradition. 'Salt and iron' alludes to the famous Han dynasty Salt and Iron Debates (81 BCE) recorded in Huan Kuan's *Discourses on Salt and Iron*, wherein court scholars debated state monopolies. 'River works' refers to the management of the Yellow River and canal systems, an imperial lifeline for agriculture and grain transport. By saying neither is discussed nor planned, Gong indicts the court for abandoning the very pillars of statecraft. The 'three sheng / one dou' figures also echo the age-old gap between nominal tax regulations and surcharges (e.g., 'fire consumption' fees, administrative corruption), a common pathology in Chinese fiscal history. Thus the poem is not merely lyric but a verdict written by an economist-poet.

此诗虽以白描见长，较少用事，但其「盐铁」「河工」二词，却暗含一条极长的经济史脉络，值得拈出。「盐铁」一典，直指西汉昭帝时著名的「盐铁之议」——桓宽《盐铁论》所载，朝廷集议盐铁官营之利弊，是国家理财思想的经典论争。自汉以降，「议盐铁」便成为关心国计者的必修课。龚自珍说「不论盐铁」，正是以这个千年命题的反面，写当局连最基础的财政大政都弃之不顾。「筹河」即筹谋黄河河工。黄河屡决、漕运系于河工，历代视河务为性命，如清代靳辅治河即是一代要政。诗中「不筹河」，写水利之废，暗指农田失溉、水患频仍的隐患。「三升」「一斗」虽非典故，却暗合历代「租庸调」「一条鞭」等赋税制度下「明轻实重」的痼疾——名义税制与附加盘剥（火耗、陋规）的落差，是读史者熟知的黑暗。龚自珍把这些经济制度史的积弊，凝成两个数字，使此诗既是诗，也是一纸农政判词，正见其「以经济学家之眼写诗」的独到处。

Commentary

Gong Zizhen is a rare thinker-poet whose 'sword-heart' verse combines political edge with lyric pathos. This *Miscellaneous Poem* is often read as a companion to his celebrated *Miscellaneous Poems of the Year Jihai* (e.g., No. 125, '九州生气恃风雷'). Where that poem cries for 'unconventional talents' to break the stagnant era, this one dissects the malady of crushing taxes. Together they frame his complete reformist vision—aspiring upward for institutional change, grieving downward for the people's tears. Critics from the late Qing onward have cited this poem as essential evidence of Gong's people-oriented thought and of the deepening rural crisis in the Daoguang era. Its unadorned, arithmetic realism anticipates the later 'Poetic Revolution' of the late nineteenth century.

龚自珍以思想家而兼诗人，其诗「剑气箫心」，往往兼具政论之锋与抒情之致。这首《杂诗》向来被视为其批判现实的代表作之一，与《己亥杂诗》诸篇互为表里。近人论龚诗，多赏其「以政论入诗而不失诗味」，此诗正是范例：它通篇几无景物描写，却因数字的冷峻与反诘的尖锐而自成诗力。值得注意的是此诗与白居易新乐府的精神血缘。白氏主张「文章合为时而著，歌诗合为事而作」，此诗「国赋三升民一斗」正是对「惟歌生民病」的隔代呼应；不同的是，白居易多写同情，龚自珍更带思想家的诊断意味——他不止哀民，更指陈制度之失。与作者《己亥杂诗·其一百二十五》并读，更见其思想全貌：那首昂扬呼告「不拘一格降人才」，是破局之愿；这首沉痛揭露赋敛之弊，是病灶之诊。一呼一揭，合为「更法」思想的完整表述。历来研究近代社会危机与龚自珍民本思想者，无不引此诗为重要文本，亦可见嘉道之际农村凋敝之缩影，及其对后来诗界革命「直面现实」主张的先导意义。

Prosody

Form Seven-character Quatrain (Qiyan Jueju), four lines, twenty-eight characters; standard form, with the first couplet stating neglect and grief, the second exposing tax abuse.七言绝句，四句二十八字，七绝正格，前两句叙政废民哭、后两句揭赋敛之弊，章法峻切，属龚自珍讽喻小诗。

Rhyme Level-tone 'ge' rhyme (歌韵). The rhyming words '河', '多', '禾' belong to the fifth rhyme group (下平五歌), one rhyme throughout. The open, deep vowel suits the solemn lament.押平声歌韵。首句「河」、次句「多」、末句「禾」同属下平五歌韵（河、多、禾属歌韵），一韵到底。歌韵音色开阔而略带沉郁，与忧民之慨、揭露之沉相称。

Tone pattern The tonal pattern departs somewhat from the strict regulated form, giving a rugged, conversational quality; this suits the poem's blunt criticism. The lines still proceed with a forceful alternation of level and deflected tones, and the repeated 'not' in the first line creates a staccato, insistent cadence.首句「不论盐铁不筹河」仄平平仄仄平平，次句「独倚东南涕泪多」仄仄平平仄仄平，三句「国赋三升民一斗」仄仄平平平仄仄，末句「屠牛那不胜栽禾」平平仄仄仄平平，大体合七绝平仄，读来顿挫有力。

Reading note The prosody serves the poem's stern indictment. The level rhymes '河多禾' give an open, sighing sound, while the juxtaposed '三升' and '一斗' create a blunt, cutting rhythm. The repeated '不' in the first line and the rhetorical '那' in the last heighten the colloquial, almost prose-like force within strict metrical constraints.这首七绝的声律，服务于它「峻切直揭」的基调。前两句一写政废（不论不筹）、一写民哭（独倚涕泪），皆用平声歌韵一贯到底，声音开阔而沉郁，像一声悠长的忧叹；后两句转入数字的冷峻与反诘的尖锐，「三升」「一斗」以仄声字顿挫收束，「胜」字重读处自带反讽的力道。押歌韵三字，韵母开阔，正合「东南」「涕泪」「栽禾」的苍茫民生画卷；而句法上两个「不」字的排沓、末句反诘的陡转，使整首诗在谨严的七绝格律中，迸发出近似散文化的批判锋芒。整体看，此诗不以声律取胜，而以内容与逻辑的冷峻压住韵律，是龚自珍「以文为诗、以政论入诗」的典型——格律在这里不是装饰，而是把一个沉重命题，稳稳托进二十八字里的骨架。

Line by line

不论盐铁不筹河，独倚东南涕泪多

Neither salt and iron revenues are discussed, nor are river conservancy plans made—condemning the court's total neglect of fundamental statecraft.

既不议论盐铁之利，也不筹谋河工治水，独自倚望东南，禁不住涕泪横流

Not debating the salt-and-iron, nor planning the river works; alone, leaning on the southeast, I shed floods of tears.

起句以两个「不」字劈空点出当局的废弛：既不议论盐铁之利（国家财政命脉），也不筹谋河工治水（农田水利根本），两项千年要政竟一并弃置。这不是疏忽，而是根本之政的尽废，其后果便是东南赋税重地的民生崩坏。后句「独倚东南涕泪多」，镜头从朝堂转向诗人自身——他独自倚望东南（赋税重地、民瘼最深之处），禁不住涕泪横流。「独」字写尽一个清醒者的孤独：满朝皆「不论不筹」，唯他一人望东南而泣；「涕泪多」则把忧民之痛写得毫无掩饰。这一联一议一情、一外一内，先立「政废」之因，再写「民哭」之果，为后文的数字揭露蓄足了势。读这一句，要看见那个在颓世中独自流泪的思想家身影。

The opening strikes through the air with the two words not...not, pointing out the relaxation of the authorities: neither debating the profit of salt and iron (the fiscal lifeline), nor planning the river works (the foundation of irrigation and farming), two thousand years' great affairs abandoned at once. This is not negligence, but the abandonment of the very foundations, and the consequence is the collapse of the people's livelihood in the southeast, the tax heartland. The next line, alone, leaning on the southeast, I shed floods of tears, turns the lens from the court to the poet himself — he alone leans gazing toward the southeast (the tax heartland, where the people's suffering runs deepest), unable to hold back the tears. The single word alone writes the solitude of the clear-eyed: the whole court neither debates nor plans, and he alone weeps gazing at the southeast; floods of tears writes the grief for the people without concealment. The couplet, one argument and one feeling, one without and one within, first establishing the cause of abandoned government, then writing the effect of the people's weeping, storing force for the numerical exposure below. Reading the line, one should see the figure of the thinker weeping alone in the declining age.

国赋三升民一斗

The state assesses only three sheng per household, yet the people actually hand over one dou—more than three times as much, exposing nominal light taxes and real heavy exactions.

国家的赋税名义上不过三升，百姓实际却要交出整整一斗

The state's tax is nominally three sheng, yet the people pay a full dou.

这一句是全诗最刺目的「数字炸弹」，也是中国赋税史最凝练的写照。「国赋三升」是朝廷明文规定的轻赋，「民一斗」是百姓实际交出的重敛，三升与一斗相差逾三倍，这中间的黑影，正是火耗、陋规、胥吏盘剥等无数看不见的加派。龚自珍以一个极简的对比，揭穿了「轻赋」神话背后的残酷现实——名义与实际的巨大落差，恰是专制赋税体制的经典痼疾。这一句的锋利，在于它用最朴素的数字说话，不靠抒情、不靠比喻，却比任何哭诉都更有力量：数字不会撒娇，只会冷冷地证明不公。它也让我们明白，诗人不仅是文人，更是经济学家——他看穿了制度的账目。七个字，抵过一篇农政奏折。

The line is the most glaring numerical bomb of the poem, and the most condensed portrait in the history of Chinese taxation. The state's tax is nominally three sheng is the officially declared light levy; the people pay a full dou is the heavy exaction the people actually hand over; three sheng and one dou differ more than threefold, and the dark shadow between them is the countless invisible surcharges of melting fees, customary exactions, and the clerks' extortion. Gong Zizhen, with the simplest contrast, strips bare the cruel reality behind the myth of light taxation — the great gap between the nominal and the actual, precisely the classic ailment of the despotic tax system. The sharpness lies in speaking through the plainest numbers, not through lyric or metaphor, yet more forcefully than any lament: numbers do not whine, they coldly prove the injustice. It also shows us the poet is not merely a man of letters but an economist — he has seen through the accounts of the system. Seven characters outweigh a whole memorial on agriculture.

屠牛那不胜栽禾

Slaughtering the ox and abandoning the fields—is that not better than planting grain? A rhetorical question that dramatizes the absurdity of peasant life under crushing taxation.

农夫宁可宰牛弃地，又岂非胜过辛苦种田

Is slaughtering the ox not, after all, better than sweating at the plough?

结句以一句反诘，把前面所有的揭露推向荒诞的极点。「屠牛」即宰杀耕牛、放弃耕种，「栽禾」即辛苦种田。在正常的农本社会里，牛是命根、田是本业，宰牛弃地是不可想象的败家；可诗人却说，农夫宁可走这条路，也「不胜」（岂非胜过、强过）辛苦种田。这个反诘的刺骨之处在于：它证明重敛已把种田逼成了「不如不种」的亏本买卖——种得越勤、赔得越惨，不如毁了生计另谋生路。这是对小农破产最沉痛的注脚，也是对整个赋税体制的无情宣判。龚自珍不用「民不聊生」之类的套语，而用一个农夫的心理抉择来写，真实得令人窒息。一句反诘收束，余痛悠长，是现实主义诗歌「写出来便是控诉」的极高明处。

The closing line, in one rhetorical question, pushes all the foregoing exposure to the extreme of absurdity. Slaughtering the ox means killing the plough ox and abandoning the fields; sweating at the plough means the toil of farming. In a normal agrarian society, the ox is life and the field the calling, and killing the ox and abandoning the land is an unthinkable ruin; yet the poet says the farmer would rather take this road than — is it not better than — sweating at the plough? The bone of the rhetorical question is this: it proves the heavy exaction has forced farming into a losing bargain — the more diligently one plants, the more grievously one loses, and it is better to destroy one's livelihood and seek another. This is the most sorrowful footnote to the small farmer's bankruptcy, and the unsparing verdict on the whole tax system. Gong Zizhen does not use worn phrases like the people have no way to live, but writes the farmer's psychological choice, real to the point of suffocation. Closing on one rhetorical question, the after-pain long, precisely the highest art of realist poetry, where the writing itself is the indictment.

Study

Word focus

不论 / 不筹 nor discuss / nor plan—the double negative stresses official inaction on vital policies. 「不论盐铁不筹河」中的两个「不」字（不论、不筹），是全诗批判力度的总闸门。它们不是「尚未」「未能」的委婉，而是干脆的「不」——当局对盐铁、河工这两大千年要政，是根本不议论、不筹谋，彻底弃置。这种斩绝的否定，比「疏于」更显荒怠，把官僚体制的麻木与短视写到极致。两个「不」字并列，形成排沓的节奏，读来像两记冷淡的耳光，把「根本之政尽废」这一触目事实，平平地、却重重地砸在读者面前。龚自珍以虚字为刃，不用一个形容词，只靠两个否定词，就把一个时代的政治失能给钉住了。这是思想家写诗的好处：他懂得在哪两个字上，下最重的判词。

独 A key expression in this poem; read it with the Chinese note below. 「独倚东南涕泪多」的「独」字，是全诗最见孤怀的一个字。满朝文武对盐铁河工「不论不筹」，举国沉浸在一种集体麻木里；唯独诗人一人，倚望东南、涕泪横流。这个「独」字，写出了一个清醒者的绝对孤独——在世皆醉的时代，醒着的人注定要独自承担那份痛。它既是对诗人自我的写照，也是对士大夫群体失职的暗讽：本该「先天下之忧而忧」的士林，此刻竟只剩一人垂泪。更妙的是，「独」与后文「民一斗」的众生苦难形成对照：流泪的虽只诗人一个，受苦的却是东南无数农夫。一字之选，把个人的忧与天下的苦，拧成了一股沉郁之气，是现实主义诗篇中难得的人称重量。

胜 A key expression in this poem; read it with the Chinese note below. 结句「屠牛那不胜栽禾」的「胜」字（不胜，即「岂非胜过、强过」），是反诘逻辑的核心，也是全诗荒诞感的凝结点。「胜」本是比较词，正常语境里「栽禾」应胜于「屠牛」——务本胜弃本。可诗人偏说宰牛弃地「不胜」（强过）种田，这就把比较关系整个颠倒了。这个「胜」字的刺骨，在于它用一种反常识的「划算」，暴露出重敛下农事的彻底失败：当种田变成亏本，毁业反而成了理性选择。龚自珍不直接说「民不聊生」，而用农夫心底那笔冷酷的账来呈现，「胜」字便是这笔账的结算符号。一字反用，荒诞立见，比千言哭诉更令人心惊——因为它证明，悲剧已经不是情绪，而是算术。

杂诗