唐 Tang · 诗 Poem
画
Painting
远看山有色,近听水无声。
春去花还在,人来鸟不惊。
Spring departs yet the flowers remain; a visitor comes but the bird is not startled.
Meaning
A painted landscape so lifelike it seems to outlast the living world.
远望山峦似有颜色,走近听水却寂然无声。 春已归去花仍绽放,人走过来鸟也不惊。
Appreciation
The quatrain turns a painted scene into a small metaphysics: what is depicted outlasts what it depicts. Distance yields color, proximity yields silence, and the unmoving bird becomes a quiet emblem of art's immunity to time.
【白话串讲】 “远看山有色,近听水无声”——王维写《画》:远看山有色,近听水无声。“春去花还在,人来鸟不惊”——春天去了花还在,人来鸟不惊。一首诗写一幅画,禅意十足。 【意象与手法】 以极浅白的语言道出画境之奇妙,“远看山有色,近听水无声”正反相生,于矛盾中见真趣;“春去花还在,人来鸟不惊”写画中花鸟超然于四时与人事之外。短短二十字,白描朴素。 【情感与主旨】 旧题王维的画诗,用最朴素的白描揭示艺术对自然的凝定与超越,体现“诗中有画”的意境,是古典题画诗中最脍炙人口、最具童趣的一首。 【名句点睛】 常考“远看山有色,近听水无声”以看听对照写画中幻境;“春去花还在,人来鸟不惊”以花不落鸟不惊写画之凝定。
Background
A short quatrain long attributed to Wang Wei (though its authorship is debated). It plays on the paradox that a painting can hold what nature cannot: perennial flowers and silent water, seeming more lasting than life itself.
这首五绝以极浅白的语言,写一幅山水画的奇妙:画里的山可远看而「有色」,画里的水可「想」却「无声」;画里的花不随春去而谢,画里的鸟不因人来而惊。它表面是题画,内里却在玩一个哲学小把戏——艺术如何既模仿自然、又悬置自然。 此诗旧题王维,但学者对其归属早有怀疑,或以为宋人作品、或以为童蒙读物,难以确考。有趣的是,无论是否王维手笔,它都深得「诗中有画、画中有诗」的意趣,与前人论王维的定评若合符契,故历来仍挂在王维名下流传。这也说明,一首好诗的生命,常常大于它的作者考证。 把此诗放回「题画诗」传统里看,它的位置很特别。题画诗自杜甫「早朝诗思在丹青」一脉,到苏轼「味摩诘之诗,诗中有画」定调,多是诗人面对名画发雅兴;而这一首不写谁画的、不写画多好,只写「画与真的不同」——远看有色、近听无声、春去花在、人来鸟不惊。它用一个孩子的眼睛,把艺术最本质的「似与不似」点破了。正因其浅,反而深;正因其像童谣,反而成了中国人理解「画」的第一课。
Art
Built on contrasts - far versus near, sound versus silence, passing spring versus permanent painted blossom, the approaching viewer versus the untroubled bird. Four plain lines quietly overturn expectation.
此诗的艺术,在于「以矛盾写真趣」,二十字里布下四组对立,却无一字说理。首句「远看山有色,近听水无声」,远与近对、山与水对、有色与无声对:山在画里本无真色,却「远看」似有;水在画里本无真声,却「近听」仍无。一个「看」字给色,一个「听」字夺声,把观画时「视觉的满足」与「听觉的落空」并置,矛盾里冒出趣味。 后二句「春去花还在,人来鸟不惊」,把矛盾推到时间与生命:春真去了,画花却还在;人真来了,画鸟却不惊。花违四时、鸟违常性,正是画之所以为画——它把一瞬凝成永恒,把活物变成静物,却因此超越了枯荣与惊惧。 四句两联,每联都是「实—虚」的结构:看是实、听是虚;春去是实、花在是虚。语言全用白描,不用一个典、不著一个形容词(除「有色」),却把「艺术对自然的凝定与超越」说尽。它是题画诗里最朴素的,也是最具童心的;不靠学问,靠一双新鲜的眼睛。这种「以浅寓深」,恰是其千年不腻的原因。
Allusions
This quatrain uses no obscure allusion, yet it stands at the end of a long tradition of 'the sameness of poetry and painting.' Su Shi's verdict on Wang Wei -- 'taste Mojie's poems: there is painting in the poetry; look at Mojie's paintings: there is poetry in the painting' -- is the readiest gloss on it: the poem is itself a demonstration of 'painting within poetry,' twenty characters in which mountain, water, flower, and bird are all four present, each pointing to the difference between the painted and the real. 'Viewed from afar the mountain has color' also reaches back to Zong Bing's 'Preface on Painting Landscapes' -- 'clarify the mind to behold the Way, recline and travel through it': landscape painting lets one roam the hills without leaving home, and it depends on just such a distant gaze. 'When spring goes the flower remains' quietly accords with the ideal of flower-and-bird painting, 'sketching from life yet seizing creation' -- the painted flower does not die because the painter has made spring permanent. The deepest provenance is in 'the bird not startled.' A real bird would fly at the sight of a man; the painted bird does not move. This detail is the very 'flaw that is the wonder' which all poems on paintings love to point out: because it does not startle, you know it is a painting; because it does not startle, it is more worth looking at than a real bird. From the Six Dynasties to the Tang-Song age, poems on paintings wrote of 'startled sparrows' and 'soaring hawks' by the dozen; this poem instead writes 'not startled' -- an ingenious inversion, stillness breaking motion, and a singular feel for the quiet beauty of a painting. The ordering of its four lines is itself a progression in 'how to view a painting': from viewing afar (distance in space) to listening near (discrimination of the senses), from spring's passing (loss in time) to the man's coming (the advent of life) -- matching the customary sequence of Chinese connoisseurship, 'first view its momentum from afar, then examine its substance close by, finally savor its vital resonance.' It compresses that whole procedure into a chain of twenty characters, so that the reader, in reciting, unconsciously rehearses 'how to look at a painting.' And because it lodges the fundamental question of painting -- 'seeming real yet not real' -- in four moments anyone can feel (seeing, hearing, time, life), this poem is not merely about some particular picture: it becomes the meta-text through which the Chinese understand 'what makes a painting a painting' -- children recite it and learn the principles of painting, men of letters savor it and find a hint of Chan; each gains according to his depth.
此诗虽无生字僻典,却站在「诗画同性」的漫长传统末端。苏轼评王维「味摩诘之诗,诗中有画;观摩诘之画,画中有诗」,为此诗提供了最现成的注脚——它本身就是一句「画中有诗」的示范:二十字,山、水、花、鸟四样画材齐全,且每样都点出「画」与「真」的差异。 「远看山有色」亦遥接宗炳《画山水序》「澄怀观道,卧以游之」的观画观:山水画让人足不出户而卧游山川,本就依赖「远看」的凝眸。而「春去花还在」则暗合中国花鸟画「写生而夺造化」的理想——画花不死,正因画家长住了春。 更深的来历在「鸟不惊」。真鸟见人必惊,画鸟见人不动,这个细节其实是所有题画诗最爱点破的「破绽即妙处」:正是因为它不惊,你才知它是画;正因为它不惊,它才比真鸟更耐看。从六朝到唐宋,题画诗写「雀惊」「鹰扬」者众,此诗反写「不惊」,是以静破动的巧思,亦见出它对「画之静美」的独到体贴。此外,此诗四句的排列本身也暗含「观画法」的递进:由远看(空间之距)到近听(感官之辨),由春去(时间之逝)到人来(生命之临),恰恰对应中国赏画「先远观其势、再近察其质、终体其气韵」的常规次序。它把一套观画程式,凝练成二十字的动作链,使读者吟诵之际,不自觉地完成了一次「如何看画」的演练。也正因它把「似真非真」这一画学根本命题,落到了人人可感的看、听、时、生四个瞬间,这首诗才不止是题某幅画,而是成了中国人理解「画之所以为画」的元文本——童蒙诵之而识画理,文人味之而得禅机,深浅各得其宜。
Commentary
Read as a Zen-flavored riddle, the poem suggests the still image captures an essence beyond change. Its limpid clarity has made it a favorite first poem for children in China.
此诗地位特殊:它未必是王维真笔,却是题画诗里流传最广、也最被童蒙诵读的一首。明人编唐诗选本多收之,清人《唐诗三百首》亦录,蘅塘退士大概看中它「浅切而易晓,可入蒙养」。近人俞平伯等论唐诗,虽指出作者疑案,仍肯定其「以矛盾揭画理」的巧思。 学者考证方面,陈寅恪等曾疑此诗非唐人作,或出自后世绝句总集的依托;然无论作者谁属,它都已沉淀为「中国画观念」的母语级文本——中国人解释「什么是画」,常不自觉地引这四句。这也是文学史上有趣的现象:一首小诗的价值,可以越过作者归属,成为文化的公共常识。 还有一点值得玩味:它写「无声」「不惊」,恰与王维「鸟鸣山更幽」一路以声写静的禅趣暗通。画里水无声、鸟不惊,不是死寂,而是一种被艺术「定格」的静,静得从容、静得永恒。这种静,正是中国艺术最珍视的境界。故虽寥寥二十字,却能与摩诘「空山不见人」的精神遥相呼应。
Prosody
Line by line
远看山有色,近听水无声。
From afar the hills show color; near at hand the stream makes no sound.
远望山峦似有颜色,走近听水却寂然无声。
From afar, the mountains show their colors; near at hand, the water is silent.
这一联是全诗的第一组矛盾,也是「观画」这件事的精微拆穿。「远看山有色」写视觉:隔着距离看画上山峦,墨色丹青竟似真有山色——一个「似」字(译文作「似有」)最关键,它承认那是错觉,却又享受这错觉。画画的高明,正在让人「远看」时信以为真。 「近听水无声」写听觉:你凑近去听画里的水,当然听不到声。这个「听」字很孩子气——明知是画,还去听,听不到也不失望,反而把「听不到」当成妙处说出来。有声是真水,无声是画水;正是这无声,提醒你它在画中,也提醒你画把真水的喧腾「收」住了。 远与近、看与听、有色与无声,三组对立在一联里完成。它不评判画好坏,只描述人面对画时的真实反应:眼睛被满足,耳朵被落空,而落空本身成了乐趣。这是只有题画诗才写得出的悖论式愉悦,二十字便把「似真非真」的观画心理写活了。
This couplet is the first set of contradictions, the subtle exposure of 'viewing a painting'. 'From afar, the mountains show their colors' is sight: at a distance the painted peaks seem truly to have color, the word 'seem' acknowledging the illusion yet enjoying it. 'Near at hand, the water is silent' is hearing: you lean close to listen to the painted water and hear nothing. The word 'listen' is childlike — knowing it is a painting, he still listens, and the silence becomes the pleasure. Far and near, sight and hearing, color and silence, three opposites in one couplet.
春去花还在,人来鸟不惊。
Spring departs yet the flowers remain; a visitor comes but the bird is not startled.
春已归去花仍绽放,人走过来鸟也不惊。
Spring has gone, yet the flowers remain; a man comes, and the birds are not startled.
这一联是第二组矛盾,把「画超越自然」写到时间与生命上。「春去花还在」:外面的春真走了,画里的花却永远开着。花违了四时,可这「违背」正是艺术的功能——它把易逝的美钉在纸上,让春常驻。一个「还」字,写出了画对时间的傲慢:你流你的逝,我留我的在。 「人来鸟不惊」:真鸟见人必惊飞,画鸟见人纹丝不动。不惊,不是笨,是画把「惊」这个动作删掉了,留下一种永恒的安然。人来了,鸟不躲,仿佛在说「我已不在那个会惊的世界里」。这就把花鸟从「活物」升格为「静物」,从「自然」升格为「艺术」。 两句合看,画成了一个「春不去、惊不发生」的平行宇宙。它比真自然更安静、更恒久,也因此更让人眷恋。一首二十字的小诗,借花与鸟,把艺术最迷人的特权——战胜时间、悬置惊惧——轻轻点破。童言般浅,哲理般深,正是此诗的不二法门。
This couplet is the second set of contradictions, raising 'the painting transcends nature' to time and life. 'Spring has gone, yet the flowers remain' — outside, spring has truly left, but in the painting the flowers bloom forever; the word 'still' gives the painting's arrogance toward time. 'A man comes, and the birds are not startled' — real birds would fly, painted birds do not; the painting has deleted the startle, leaving an eternal calm. Together, the painting becomes a parallel universe where spring does not depart and fright does not happen, quieter and more permanent than real nature.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Compare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
王维《鸟鸣涧》「人闲桂花落,夜静春山空。月出惊山鸟,时鸣春涧中」,与此诗同写「静」与「鸟」的禅趣。不同在:王诗写真山真鸟,以一声鸟鸣反衬更深的静(鸟惊而鸣,静愈显);此诗写画中鸟,以「不惊」写一种被定格的、超越惊惧的静。一真一画、一惊一不惊,却同归于中国艺术最珍视的「静境」。并读可见,不论面对自然还是面对艺术,王维一脉的诗人都在琢磨同一件事:如何把「静」写到极致。
题山水图 题山水图 (历代题画诗传统) · 同属题画一体,雅制与童谣之别 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
自杜甫「早朝诗思在丹青」、苏轼题王摩诘画起,题画诗多是文人面对名迹发雅兴,用典使事、品评笔墨;此诗却全无这些,只以白描点破「画与真的不同」,像一首童谣。二者同是题画,一雅一浅,却各有其贵:雅制见学养,童谣见本真。此诗的价值,正在它跳出了文人题画的套路,用最干净的眼睛重新定义了「什么是画」,反而成了题画诗里最普及的一首。
画鸡 画鸡 唐寅 · 同为题画、同以破绽写妙,明人仿唐风 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
唐寅《画鸡》「平生不敢轻言语,一叫千门万户开」,也是题画诗,也抓住画中物「不会真动」的破绽来做文章——画鸡不叫,诗人偏说它「不敢轻言语」,把静写成一种蓄势的威。这与「人来鸟不惊」同一机杼:都从「画中物不似真物反应」落笔,把破绽翻成妙处。唐寅在明,此诗在唐(或托唐),一写鸡一写鸟,隔代呼应,可见「以不似写似、以静写神」是题画诗一以贯之的巧门。