唐 Tang · 诗 Poem
黄鹤楼
Yellow Crane Tower
昔人已乘黄鹤去,此地空余黄鹤楼。
黄鹤一去不复返,白云千载空悠悠。
晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲。
日暮乡关何处是,烟波江上使人愁。
To what avail is Yellow Crane Tower left here?
Once gone, the yellow crane will ne'er on earth alight;
Only white clouds still float in vain from year to year.
By sunlit river trees can be count'd one by one;
On Parrot Islet sweet green grass grows fast and thick.
Where is my native land beyond the setting sun?
The mist-veiled waves of River Han make me homesick.
Meaning
The poet ascends the Yellow Crane Tower, recalls the legend of an immortal riding a crane, and feels the passage of time and his own homesickness. The first half laments the past, the second half describes the present view and his longing for home.
昔日的仙人已乘黄鹤飞去,这里只空留下一座黄鹤楼。黄鹤一去再不返回,唯有白云千百年里空自悠悠。晴天里汉阳的树木清晰可数,鹦鹉洲上芳草长得茂盛连片。日暮时分我的故乡究竟在何处,江上烟波迷茫,教人平添无尽乡愁。
Appreciation
The poem opens with a mythic past, using repetition of 'yellow crane' and 'empty' to create a vast, timeless atmosphere. Then it shifts to bright, clear scenery, contrasting with the melancholy homesickness in the final couplet. The structure is innovative: the first four lines are loose and free, the last four are strictly parallel.
【白话串讲】 传说李白登上黄鹤楼本想题诗,看到崔颢这首,叹服道:眼前有景道不得。仙人黄鹤、白云千载——崔颢用一首诗,让黄鹤楼成了唐诗的最高地标。 【意象与手法】 此诗前四句一气流转,以「黄鹤」「白云」「空」等意象回环复沓,几乎全用散行古调,不拘平仄对仗;后四句忽而收敛为工整的律联,「晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲」叠字对仗、色彩明丽,以乐景衬哀情。全篇由虚入实、由古及今、由景入情,前散后整,跌宕生姿。 【情感与主旨】 崔颢于开元十一年(723)前后登武昌黄鹤楼而作。诗人借仙人乘鹤的传说起笔,以日暮乡愁收束,将神话、江山、历史与个人之思熔于一炉,抒发怀古的怅惘与羁旅思乡之情。相传李白登楼见此诗,叹「眼前有景道不得,崔颢题诗在上头」而为之搁笔。 【名句点睛】 常考吊古思乡主题与「昔人已乘黄鹤去」的仙人传说;「晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲」的叠字对仗与乐景衬哀;「日暮乡关何处是,烟波江上使人愁」的设问结情。严羽《沧浪诗话》推此诗为「唐人七言律诗第一」。
Background
Cui Hao wrote this poem around 723 AD while climbing the Yellow Crane Tower in Wuchang. Legend says Li Bai was so impressed that he abandoned his own attempt to write a poem on the same subject. It is often hailed as the greatest seven-character regulated verse of the Tang dynasty.
崔颢(约704—754),汴州(今河南开封)人,盛唐诗人。早年诗多浮艳,晚岁出入边塞,风格一变而为风骨凛然。此诗为其开元十一年(723)前后登武昌黄鹤楼所作,具体年月文献无征,多据其行踪推断。相传李白登楼本欲题诗,见此作后叹曰:「眼前有景道不得,崔颢题诗在上头」,遂搁笔而去。此说虽出后人记载、未必尽实,却足见此诗在当时人心目中的分量。黄鹤楼始建于三国孙吴黄武二年(223),临长江而峙,登楼可尽览江汉交汇之胜,自古为登临胜地;唐人登楼怀古、即景生愁,已成诗歌传统,崔颢此作正是这一传统中境界最为宏阔、情韵最为悠长的一篇。诗以仙人乘鹤的传说起笔,以日暮乡愁收束,将神话、历史、江山与个人之思熔于一炉,被严羽《沧浪诗话》推为「唐人七言律诗第一」,后世遂有「千古绝唱」「七律之冠」之誉,亦可见盛唐诗人登高临远、吞吐古今的普遍胸襟与开阔气象。
Art
The poem flows naturally: the first half uses ancient-style freedom with repeated characters, the second half adopts strict regulated-verse parallelism. The couplet '晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲' is vivid and colorful, using bright scenery to deepen the sorrow.
此诗艺术上最突出的特点,是以古调写律体、以气运辞,破七律常格而生奇变。前四句一气贯注,写仙人乘鹤、黄鹤不返、白云悠悠,几乎全用散行,不拘平仄对仗,如「黄鹤一去不复返」连用仄声而气势不减;只在「昔人」「黄鹤」「此地」「白云」等意象的往复回环中见章法。三见「黄鹤」、两用「空」字,复沓而不觉重复,反而造成一种苍茫的旋律感,仿佛仙踪渺然、时光空逝的叹息在字里行间回荡。后四句忽而收敛为工整的律联:「晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲」以叠字对仗、色彩明丽,写出登楼所见的实景;「日暮乡关何处是,烟波江上使人愁」以设问对结句,将前文的缥缈与后文的明丽一并收束于乡愁。全诗由虚入实、由古及今、由景入情,前散后整,跌宕生姿。此外,「历历」「萋萋」的叠字既写景物之清晰繁茂,又暗用《楚辞》「王孙游兮不归,春草生兮萋萋」之意,明丽之中已含迟暮与思归之愁,以乐景写哀情,更见情韵之深。
Allusions
The opening refers to the legend of the immortal Zi'an (or Fei Yi) riding a yellow crane. Parrot Isle (鹦鹉洲) is named after Mi Heng's 'Parrot Rhapsody'. The poem seamlessly blends myth, history, and personal emotion.
「昔人已乘黄鹤去」用黄鹤楼得名之传说。《南齐书·州郡志》载,仙人子安曾乘黄鹤过此,楼因得名;又有三国蜀汉费祎登仙、每乘黄鹤憩于此楼之说。无论子安抑或费祎,此典都为全诗罩上一层缥缈的神话色彩,仙去楼存,起笔即见空寂。「晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲」写登楼实景,而鹦鹉洲得名于东汉名士祢衡:祢衡恃才傲物,为江夏太守黄祖所杀,葬于洲上,其《鹦鹉赋》辞采华茂,洲因以名。崔颢笔下的萋萋芳草,既写眼前秋色,也暗暗牵连着祢衡的悲剧命运与文人怀才不遇的千古慨叹。「日暮乡关何处是」之设问,则承汉乐府「悲歌可以当泣,远望可以当归」的乡愁传统。全篇以传说起、以实景承、以乡愁收,典故与即景浑然一体,不着痕迹,正是盛唐诗人用典如「水中着盐、饮之乃知」的高境。此外,「白云千载空悠悠」亦暗合游仙传统中白云苍狗、世事无常之叹;黄鹤楼历六朝至唐屡毁屡建,登楼者代有其人,诗人一己之怀古遂借传说与故实升华为对时光永恒的追问,用典虽多而浑然一体。
Commentary
Yan Yu's 'Canglang's Remarks on Poetry' calls this the best seven-character regulated verse. Li Bai's 'Climbing the Phoenix Tower' shows its influence. Many critics consider it superior to Li Bai's similar works.
此诗自问世以来,历代评价极高。严羽《沧浪诗话》云:「唐人七言律诗,当以崔颢《黄鹤楼》为第一。」此后诸家选本多奉为圭臬。元人辛文房《唐才子传》亦载李白搁笔之传说,虽未必实录,却成诗坛千古佳话。李白后来作《登金陵凤凰台》,句法章次显受此诗影响,尤以「凤凰台上凤凰游,凤去台空江自流」对「昔人已乘黄鹤去,此地空余黄鹤楼」为近,后人遂有「崔李优劣」之争;多数论者以为崔诗浑然天成,李诗效颦而终不能掩,清人沈德潜《唐诗别裁》即谓「太白推服,岂虚语哉」。在文学史意义上,《黄鹤楼》的价值不仅在其为七律之冠,更在以古调入律、以气驭辞的成功实践,为盛唐律诗的解放提供了范本;其怀古与乡愁交织的主题,亦成为唐人登临诗的基本模式。此诗传诵千年,至今仍是中国诗歌史上「以孤篇立名」的典范。历代诗人登临题咏,莫不受其笼罩;《黄鹤楼》遂与岳阳楼、滕王阁题咏并称千古名胜之诗,其怀古之思与乡愁之切,融神话、江山、历史、个人于一体,千载之下犹能动人心魄,实为唐诗中情与景、古与今、虚与实完美交融的极致。
Prosody
Line by line
昔人已乘黄鹤去,此地空余黄鹤楼。
The immortal has ridden the yellow crane away, leaving only the empty tower. This couplet establishes the sense of loss and the passage of time.
仙人已乘黄鹤飞去,此地只空留下一座黄鹤楼。
The immortal long ago rode off on the yellow crane; here, the tower alone remains.
起笔即以神话传说领起。「乘」字写仙人飘然而去,「空余」二字写人去楼空,一座巍然的高楼在「空」字的笼罩下顿显苍茫孤寂。诗人不先写楼之高峻、江之浩荡,而先从仙踪的渺然写起,将登楼怀古的基调一举奠定——楼因人而名,人既已去,楼遂成空壳,怀古的怅惘便由这「空余」二字自然流出。首联两句一实一虚、一人一楼,对举中已含今昔之变,为全篇定下苍茫空寂的底色。
The opening begins with the legend. The word 'rode' writes the immortal's floating departure; 'alone remains' writes the man gone and the tower empty, a towering building wrapped in the word 'empty' at once vast and solitary. Rather than the tower's height or the river's breadth, he begins with the vanished immortal, setting the elegiac tone — the tower is named for the man, and since he is gone, the tower is a shell. One real, one imagined, man and tower, the change of past and present contained.
黄鹤一去不复返,白云千载空悠悠。
The yellow crane never returns; only white clouds drift for a thousand years. It contrasts the fleeting human world with eternal nature.
黄鹤一去再不返回,唯有白云千百年里空自悠悠飘浮。
The yellow crane once gone and never returning, the white clouds through a thousand years drift on.
「不复返」写仙踪之不可追,「空悠悠」写白云之无尽时。两句以黄鹤之短暂与白云之永恒对举,将人事的倏忽与天地的长久并置,时空的苍茫之感油然而生。这里「空」字第二次出现,与首联的「空余」呼应——首联之空是楼中无人,此联之空是天外无鹤,两「空」相叠,怀古之思愈转愈深。诗人不写悲而悲自见,不写愁而愁已满纸,全以意象的对照与时间的绵延出之,正是盛唐七律以气驭景、不落言筌的高境。
'Never returning' writes the untraceable immortal; 'drift on' the endless clouds. The brief crane set against the eternal cloud, human haste against heaven's duration, the vastness of time and space rising. The word 'empty' appears a second time, echoing 'alone remains' above — the first emptiness is no man in the tower, this emptiness is no crane beyond the sky; two 'empties' deepening the elegy. Not a word of grief, yet grief fills the page, all through the contrast of images and the stretch of time.
晴川历历汉阳树,芳草萋萋鹦鹉洲。
The clear river, the distinct trees of Hanyang, and the lush grass on Parrot Isle. This bright scenery contrasts with the melancholy of the final couplet, using joy to set off sorrow.
晴天里汉阳的树木清晰可数,鹦鹉洲上芳草茂盛连片。
In the clear sunlight, the trees of Hanyang stand out; on Parrot Isle, the fragrant grass grows thick.
此联由缥缈的神话忽转眼前实景,章法上陡然一变。「历历」写晴日下汉阳树木之清晰,一洗前文空茫;「萋萋」写鹦鹉洲上芳草之繁茂,叠字对仗,色彩明丽,境界开阔而明亮。然而乐景之中暗藏哀思:「萋萋」暗用《楚辞》「春草生兮萋萋」的怀人之典,芳草连天而游子未归,明丽的反面正是思归的惆怅。以乐景写哀情,一倍增其哀;由虚入实的章法转换,也使全诗的节奏由舒缓变为明快,再转入日暮的苍茫,跌宕有致。
This couplet turns abruptly from the misty legend to the real scene, a sharp change of design. 'Stand out' writes the trees of Hanyang clear in the sunlight, washing away the earlier vagueness; 'grow thick' writes the lush grass on Parrot Isle, doubled words matched, the colors bright and open. Yet joyous scene hides sorrow: 'grow thick' borrows the Verses of Chu longing, fragrant grass reaching the sky while the wanderer does not return. Writing grief through joyous scene doubles the grief; the turn from void to real quickens the rhythm.
日暮乡关何处是,烟波江上使人愁。
At dusk, where is my homeland? The misty river makes me sorrowful. The poem ends with a rhetorical question and a scene of mist, blending homesickness with the vast landscape.
日暮时分,我的故乡究竟在何处?江上烟波迷茫,教人平添无尽的乡愁。
At dusk, where is my home? The misty river makes me grieve.
尾联以设问收束,是全诗情感的总爆发。「日暮」点明时间,为全诗笼上一层苍茫的暮色;「乡关何处是」直问故乡之所在,然而望尽天涯,唯见「烟波江上」一片迷茫,问而不答,愁绪便在这迷茫中无限延展。由神话、江山、历史一路铺排,至此骤然收归个人的乡愁,大而化小、小而弥深;「使人愁」三字直揭题旨,而烟波渺渺的形象又使这愁绪含蓄不尽、余味无穷。全诗以传说起、以实景承、以乡愁收,起结照应,浑融无迹,故能压卷千古。
The closing couplet ends in a question, the total outbreak of feeling. 'At dusk' sets the hour, wrapping the poem in a vast twilight; 'where is my home?' asks after home, yet gazing to the horizon he sees only the misty river — asked, not answered, and the sorrow stretches in that vagueness. From myth, river, and history it suddenly contracts to personal homesickness, the great made small and the small the deeper; 'makes me grieve' names the theme, while the misty image leaves the grief unending. The poem begins in legend, continues in real scene, ends in homesickness.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
Li Bai's poem is about parting, while Cui Hao's is about nostalgia. Both use the Yellow Crane Tower as a setting, but different emotions.
李白《黄鹤楼送孟浩然之广陵》「故人西辞黄鹤楼,烟花三月下扬州。孤帆远影碧空尽,唯见长江天际流」与本诗同以黄鹤楼为背景,而一写送别、一写怀古,同地而异旨。李诗以「烟花三月」的明丽与「孤帆远影」「天际流」的旷远写送别之情,景随帆去、情随水长,气韵飘逸;崔诗以仙踪传说与日暮烟波写怀古乡愁,苍茫沉郁。同是楼头之作,一空灵一浑厚,正可见黄鹤楼题咏的两副笔墨:送别之景宜其轻快,怀古之思宜其苍茫。合观二诗,亦足见盛唐诗人于同一地点各极其致、不主故常的创造力。
登幽州台歌 On the Tower at Youzhou 陈子昂 · 同写登临怀古的时空苍茫 Same theme of climbing and melancholyChen Zi'ang's poem expresses personal solitude in the face of infinite time, similar to Cui Hao's 'white clouds drift for a thousand years'.
陈子昂《登幽州台歌》「前不见古人,后不见来者。念天地之悠悠,独怆然而涕下」与本诗「白云千载空悠悠」同写登临之际的时空苍茫,而方式迥异。陈诗以直白的呐喊写个人面对天地时的孤独,慷慨悲凉,如火山喷薄;崔诗以意象的铺排写怀古的怅惘,白云千载、烟波江上,含蓄沉郁,如江水悠长。一为古体短章、情溢于辞,一为律诗长调、情藏于景;一悲慨、一苍茫,却同样触及「人于天地间之渺小与孤独」这一永恒主题,并列为初盛唐登临怀古的双璧,正可见唐诗抒情方式由质直向含蓄演进的轨迹。