唐 Tang · 诗 Poem
南园十三首·其五
South Garden, Thirteen Songs · Fifth
男儿何不带吴钩,收取关山五十州。
请君暂上凌烟阁,若个书生万户侯。
And reclaim the fifty frontier provinces of pass and mountain?
Pray step for a moment into the Lingyan Gallery,
And tell me which scholar was ever made a lord of ten thousand households.
Meaning
A blunt, two-question outburst: why does a man not take up arms to recover the lost provinces, and—look at the gallery of heroes—which scholar was ever enfeoffed? The surface bravado hides a bitter dead end.
男子汉大丈夫为什么不佩带吴钩宝刀,去收复关山那五十个州郡呢?请你且登上凌烟阁去看一看,那上面哪里有一个书生被封为万户侯的?
Appreciation
Four lines, two questions, each sharper than the last. The first stirs to action, the second burns with indignation. The 'Wu-hook' is a weapon, the 'Lingyan Gallery' a symbol of honor, the 'scholar' the poet's own self—three images form one chain: for honor, join the army; the army's men are painted, the scholar gets nothing. Li He came from a fallen royal house and was barred from the exams by a naming taboo on his father; 'which scholar was ever made a lord' is angry talk that learning is useless, and a bloody accusation of his own fate. It sounds bold but is despair underneath—it speaks of throwing down the brush, yet really there is no road left.
【白话串讲】 “男儿何不带吴钩,收取关山五十州”——李贺说:男儿为什么不带上吴钩,去收复那五十州?“请君暂上凌烟阁,若个书生万户侯”——看看凌烟阁上,有几个书生封侯? 【意象与手法】 全诗四句,两次发问,一句比一句锋利。前一问是激励,后一问是激愤。“吴钩”是武器,“凌烟阁”是功名的象征,“书生”是诗人自己的身份——三个意象构成一条完整的逻辑链:要功名,须从军;从军者得画像,书生什么也没有。 【情感与主旨】 李贺出身没落宗室,因父名晋肃犯“进士”嫌名,被迫弃考,终身不得应进士试。此诗的“若个书生万户侯”,是对读书无用的愤激之言,更是对自身遭遇的血泪控诉。表面豪迈,底子是绝望;说的是投笔从戎,实则是无路可走。 【名句点睛】 “请君暂上凌烟阁,若个书生万户侯”——不作正面议论,只请人去看一眼那面墙。事实胜于雄辩,反问强于痛斥,是唐诗中最冷峻的两句愤语之一。
Background
The 'Thirteen Songs of the South Garden' were written after Li He left his post as a ritual officer and retired to his home Changgu (present-day Yiyang, Henan); this is the fifth. In the mid-Tang, regional warlords held the northeast in defiance of the court; the 'fifty provinces of pass and mountain' refers to the prefectures they seized that the court could not control. The Lingyan Gallery was built by Emperor Taizong in 643, painting twenty-four meritorious officials—the highest symbol of martial honor. Barred by the father-taboo, Li He never sat the exam and wrote this in frustration.
《南园十三首》为李贺辞去奉礼郎之职、退居故乡昌谷(今河南宜阳)时所作的组诗,此为其五。李贺,字长吉,中唐浪漫主义诗人,人称「诗鬼」,出身唐宗室远支,父名晋肃。因「晋肃」之「晋」与「进士」之「进」同音,时人援「嫌名」之礼阻其应进士试,贺遂被迫弃考,终身坎坷,仅作过奉礼郎这样的小官,二十七岁抑郁而终。此诗正作于失意家居之时。中唐藩镇割据,河朔诸镇(河北、山东一带)久不奉朝命,朝廷姑息,所谓「关山五十州」即指被藩镇割据、中央不能有效控制的州郡,非实数而言其多。凌烟阁为唐太宗贞观十七年所建,图画长孙无忌、尉迟敬德等二十四位功臣像于其上,为唐代武人功业的最高象征。李贺以宗室子而困于场屋、阻于仕进,满腔报国之志无处施展,遂借南园闲居发此愤激之鸣——表面豪迈投笔,底子却是无路可走的血泪控诉。李贺以宗室子困于场屋,满腔报国之志无处施展,遂借南园闲居发此愤激之鸣,表面豪迈投笔,底子却是无路可走之血泪控诉。
Art
The poem is two rhetorical questions: 'why not buckle on the Wu-hook' provokes, 'which scholar was ever a lord' retorts, one provoking, one refuting, pressing forward. The finest stroke is the closing 'let the fact speak'—no argument, just go look at those twenty-four portraits on the wall, let the images speak for themselves. This evidentiary rhetorical question is more convincing, and more desolate, than any grand speech. The language is vigorous, the rhythm short—unlike Li He's usual cold strangeness, opening a bold, direct path.
全诗以两个反问句构成,第一问「男儿何不带吴钩」是激将,第二问「若个书生万户侯」是反诘,一激一诘,层层推进。艺术上最见功力的是末句的「以事实作结」——诗人不发任何正面议论,只请人「暂上凌烟阁」去看那二十四幅功臣图,让墙上的画像自己说话:图上尽是提刀跃马的武夫,何曾有一个执卷的书生?这种举证式的反问,比任何慷慨陈词都更有说服力,也更显悲凉。全诗语言劲健、节奏短促,一改李贺惯有的幽冷奇诡、秾丽雕琢,别开雄直一路,二十八字中豪气逼人而怨气潜涌。章法上,前两句由「男儿」起、以「收取五十州」承,写理想之壮;后两句由「凌烟阁」转、以「书生万户侯」收,写现实之酷,理想与现实两相对照,转折斩截,是唐人绝句「以问代议」的佳例,亦可见李贺笔力之全面——不仅能写幽怪,亦能写沉痛。全诗两问一激一诘,理想与现实两相对照,转折斩截而悲凉潜涌,末以举证式反问代正面抒愤,更显无路可走之绝望,章法之妙在收束有力。
Allusions
Three apt allusions: the 'Wu-hook,' a curved blade forged by King Helü of Wu, later a general name for a fine sword, standing for war; the 'fifty provinces of pass and mountain,' the prefectures seized by warlords in Hebei and Shandong, not a real count but 'many'; the 'Lingyan Gallery,' where Taizong painted twenty-four heroes, symbol of enfeoffment by arms. The three form the full path of taking up arms, winning merit, being painted—contrasting the scholar's roadlessness.
诗中三处用典皆切功名之路,构成一条完整的逻辑链。其一「吴钩」,春秋吴王阖闾所造的弯刀,锋利无比,《吴越春秋》载其令国中作金钩,后遂为宝刀通称,诗词中多代指从军征战、建功立业(如李百药「磊磊落落吴钩」)。其二「关山五十州」,指唐代被藩镇割据的河北、山东等地州郡,《资治通鉴》载会昌年间朝廷讨伐泽潞,所谓「五十州」即当时割据之数,非实数而言其广,点明时代之乱与恢复之志。其三「凌烟阁」,唐太宗图画二十四功臣之所,杜如晦、魏徵、尉迟敬德等皆在其列,为武功封侯的最高象征,太宗题赞,后遂成「立功画像」的代称。三典由执兵(吴钩)、立功(收取州郡)到画像(凌烟阁)一气贯通,正写「男儿」应走之路,反衬书生(诗人自身)被摒于此路之外的荒诞,用典之密而意脉之清,于此可见。吴钩关山五十州凌烟阁三典由执兵立功到画像一气贯通,正写男儿应走之路,反衬书生被摒门外之荒诞,用典之密而意脉之清于此可见。
Commentary
Yao Wenxie's 'Changgu Collected, Annotated' says 'He, a royal clansman stuck in the exam hall, hence the thought of throwing down the brush—the words seem bold but the meaning is truly sad.' Later readers note his pent-up feeling lodged in bold talk, a clear break from his usual cold style.
清人姚文燮《昌谷集注》评「贺以宗室子而困于场屋,故有投笔之思,词若壮而意实悲」,一语道破此诗外壮内悲的底色。近人论李贺,每注意其幽冷奇艳一面,而此首劲直如刀,正可见其豪宕之气的另一副笔墨。沈德潜《唐诗别裁》虽未专评此首,而论李贺诗「设色浓妙」,而此篇独去秾丽、取雄直,足征才力不拘一格。尤可注意者,末句「若个书生万户侯」以事实反诘,较之正面抒愤更为沉痛——它不喊冤,只请你去看一眼那面墙,让图像作证。这种「以不言言之」的手法,使愤懑在克制中更显磅礴。在唐代投笔从戎主题中,此诗与杨炯「宁为百夫长,胜作一书生」同调而异代:初唐者昂扬自信,中唐者激愤沉痛,时代气象之由盛转衰,于此二句可窥一斑。李贺以二十七岁之夭年,留此一声金石之鸣,足为后世志士同悲。此篇外壮内悲,与杨炯投笔之叹同调而异代,初唐昂扬、中唐激愤,时代气象之迁变于此二句可窥,诚李贺七绝中之金石之鸣。
Prosody
Line by line
男儿何不带吴钩,收取关山五十州。
Why should a young man not buckle on the Wu hook and win back the fifty provinces of mountain pass?
男子汉大丈夫为什么不佩带吴钩宝刀去从军,去把被藩镇割据的五十州关山收复回来?
Why should a young man not buckle on the Wu-hook saber and take back the fifty mountain provinces held by the rebels?
起联以劈空一问振起全篇,气势陡健,是唐人绝句中罕见的雄直之音。「男儿」二字先立主体,「何不」二字反诘而出,如当头棒喝,逼人作答;「带吴钩」以宝刀代从军,把抽象的报国志写得具体而凛然。下句「收取关山五十州」紧承,以「收取」这一斩截有力的动词,把豪情落到收复藩镇的实际功业上——中唐河朔割据、中央孱弱,此句正戳中时代痛点。两句一激一承,理想之壮已极,而读者若知李贺本是困于场屋、终身未第的书生,便知这「男儿何不」实是诗人自己的呐喊与自嘲:他何尝不想带钩收取,奈何无路请缨。表面豪迈,底子是绝望;说的是投笔从戎,实则是无路可走。起手即把个人身世与时代乱局熔铸为一,雄健中已伏悲凉。
The opening couplet rises with a sweeping question, the spirit suddenly strong, a rare stern, direct voice among Tang quatrains. 'A young man' first sets the subject, 'why not?' the counter-question like a blow, forcing an answer; 'buckle on the Wu hook' taking the saber for the army, writing the abstract will to serve the state as something concrete and stern. The next line, 'and win back the fifty provinces of mountain pass' follows, the decisive verb 'win back' landing the elan on the real achievement of recovering the rebel-held provinces — mid-Tang, the regions north of the Yellow River were warlord-held, the central court weak, and this line strikes the age's raw nerve. Two lines, one challenge one follow-through, ideal at its height; yet the reader who knows that Li He was a scholar trapped in the examination rooms, never passing the exam in his life, knows that this 'why not, young man' is really the poet's own cry and self-mockery: how he longed to buckle on the hook and win the provinces, yet had no road to volunteer. Bold on the surface, despair at the root; speaking of laying aside the pen for the sword, really of no road to take. From the first stroke, personal lot and the age's disorder are fused, and the boldness already hides grief.
请君暂上凌烟阁,若个书生万户侯。
Go up, I pray, and look at the Lingyan Pavilion; which of those portraits is a scholar made lord of ten thousand households?
请你姑且登上凌烟阁去看一看,那上面哪里有一个书生被封为万户侯的?
I pray you, go up and look at the Lingyan Pavilion; which scholar there is made a lord of ten thousand households?
后联以前联的豪情骤转,由理想坠入现实,是全诗最沉痛的落点。「请君暂上凌烟阁」语气从容如邀人闲步,实则把人引向一个残酷的证据现场——凌烟阁上二十四功臣,尽是提刀跃马的武夫。「若个书生万户侯」以「若个」(哪一个)反诘收束,不作正面议论,只让墙上的画像自己作答:图上从无书生。这一「以事实作结」的手法,比任何痛斥都更有力,因为事实胜于雄辩。而事实恰恰证明:书生(即诗人自己)被彻底摒于功名之门之外。李贺因父讳被阻进士,连「书生」进阶之路都被堵死,此句正是对自身遭遇的血泪控诉。激愤在外、悲凉在内,反问强于痛哭。两句与起联呼应:前说男儿当带钩收取,后说书生终无封侯——理想与现实的两道闸门轰然合拢,遂成唐人绝句中冷峻至极的愤语。
The closing couplet turns abruptly from the opening elan, falling from ideal to reality, the bitterest landing of the poem. 'Go up, I pray, and look at the Lingyan Pavilion' the tone as easy as asking a man for a stroll, yet leading him to a cruel court of evidence — on the Lingyan Pavilion, the twenty-four portraits are all warriors with blades and horses. 'Which of those portraits is a scholar made lord of ten thousand households?' closes in counter-question, no direct argument, letting the portraits on the wall answer for themselves: never a scholar among them. This method of 'ending in fact' is stronger than any invective, because fact outranks eloquence; and the fact proves precisely this: the scholar — the poet himself — is utterly barred from the gate of fame. Li He, blocked from the jinshi examination by his father's naming taboo, had even the scholar's road closed; this line is the blood-and-tears indictment of his own lot. Indignation without, grief within, the counter-question stronger than weeping. The two lines echo the opening: first, the young man should buckle on the hook and win back the provinces; now, the scholar ends with no fief — the two floodgates of ideal and reality crash shut, forming the coldest, angriest quatrain of Tang verse.
Study
Word focus
Related Reading
'Ballad of the General' faces the battlefield's death head-on with lush, strange brush; this poem writes the thought of throwing down the brush with keen retort—two brushes for Li He's bold side.
《雁门太守行》以「黑云压城城欲摧」「报君黄金台上意,提携玉龙为君死」的浓艳奇崛之笔正面写战场死节,此诗则以劲直反诘写投笔之思,同出李贺而一浓一淡、一写沙场一写书斋之愤。合读可见李贺豪壮一面的两种笔法:或借古战场抒忠愤,或借凌烟阁写无路,皆热血郁勃,而此首更见其身世之痛。同出李贺而一浓一淡、一写沙场一写书斋之愤,合读可见其豪壮两面之笔法。
从军行 Song of Joining the Army 杨炯 · 同抒书生从军之志 Both voice the scholar's wish to join the army.Yang's 'Better a low officer than a bookish man' and Li's 'which scholar was ever a lord' are both sighs of the brush laid down; the early Tang one is confident, the mid-Tang one indignant—the eras' weather clearly differs.
杨炯「宁为百夫长,胜作一书生」与李贺「若个书生万户侯」同为书生弃笔之叹,而时代迥异:初唐杨炯昂扬自信,以从军为荣;中唐李贺激愤沉痛,以书生无路为咒。一正一反、一乐一悲,恰可对照唐人功名观由盛转衰的脉络,亦见同题在不同时代之不同声口。初唐杨炯昂扬自信,中唐李贺激愤沉痛,同写书生从军而时代声口迥异。
古从军行 Old Song of the Army 李颀 · 同写从军与书生际遇之反思 Related readingCompare this related work with the poem above through theme, imagery, tone, and emotional movement.
李颀《古从军行》「年年战骨埋荒外,空见蒲桃入汉家」以边功之虚耗反讽穷兵,李贺此诗以「若个书生万户侯」以书生无封反激投笔,同写从军主题而取向不同:李颀悲生民、刺开边,李贺悲身世、慕功名。一向外忧、一向内愤,合观可见盛中唐从军诗由家国关怀向个人际遇的双重变奏。李颀悲生民刺开边,李贺悲身世慕功名,一向外忧一向内愤,合观可见从军诗之双重变奏。