All poems

战国战国 · 文 Prose

刻舟求剑·版本

Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword (version)

吕不韦

Lü Buwei

寓言Fable 讽刺Satire 名篇Famous piece

楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水，遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠。
舟止，从其所契者入水求之。

There was a man of Chu crossing the river; his sword fell from the boat into the water. He at once notched the boat, saying: 'This is the place from which my sword fell.' When the boat stopped, he entered the water from the place he had notched to search for it.

Listen

Meaning

This fable tells of a man of Chu who, after his sword falls into the river, marks the boat and later searches at the mark. It satirizes those who cling to fixed methods and cannot adapt to changed circumstances.

楚国有个渡江的人，他的剑从船上掉进水里，他急忙在船帮上刻下记号，说：这里就是我的剑掉下去的地方。船停下后，他从刻记号的地方跳进水里去找剑。

Appreciation

[Plain Paraphrase] A man of Chu crosses the river; his sword falls in; he hastily notches the boat, saying 'this is where it fell'; when the boat stops he dives in at the notch to look. [Method] In fifty-three characters it is the epitome of 'saying much in little': the three actions 'notch,' 'say,' 'seek' sketch the fool's self-assurance in plain description, and the mismatch between 'where the boat stopped' and 'his notch' exposes the absurdity—the narration stays cool and objective, with not a word of praise or blame yet the satire shows itself; the use of contrast (notch versus sword) and illusion (treating the mark as the sword's place) is exquisite. [Theme] It mocks those wedded to old rules who cannot adapt, warning the ruler that 'when the age changes, the law should change'—the image of the Lü Shi Chun Qiu's doctrine of 'examining the present.'

【白话串讲】《吕氏春秋》写《刻舟求剑》：楚人渡江时剑掉进水里，“遽契其舟”——急忙在船帮上刻记号。船停了，他从刻记号的地方下水找剑——“舟已行矣，而剑不行”——他讽刺不知变通的人。【意象与手法】全文五十三字，寓言「以少总多」的典范：以「遽契」「曰」「求」三个动作白描愚人的自以为是，以「舟止」与「其所契者」的错位点破其荒谬，叙事冷静客观，无一字褒贬而讽刺自现；对比（刻处与剑处）、错觉（以刻痕为剑之所在）的运用尤为精妙。【情感与主旨】讽刺拘泥成法、不知变通之人，警示治国者「世易时移，变法宜矣」，是《吕氏春秋·察今》「因时变法」主张的形象化表达。【名句点睛】「刻舟求剑」已为成语，点睛在「从其所契者入水求之」——以刻痕定位已移之舟，荒诞中见深刻，讥刺「法先王而不知变」的守旧思维。

Background

This piece comes from the Lü Shi Chun Qiu, 'Examining the Present' (Cha Jin), attributed to Lü Buwei (?–235 BCE), a merchant of Puyang in Wei who became chancellor of Qin and had his retainers compile the Lü Shi Chun Qiu (also called the Lü Lan) around 239 BCE, a syncretic work of the Hundred Schools. The chapter 'Examining the Present' argues that 'when the age changes, the law should change'—a state's laws must shift with the times and not cling to the ways of former kings; to this end it tells three fables—'following the marks to ford by night,' 'carving the boat to seek the sword,' and 'throwing the infant into the river.' The story is set in Chu, a land of rivers and lakes where crossing the river was everyday, making the analogy apt. This 'version' is the complete core passage of the received text. Han Fei has a similar fable ('waiting by the stump'), showing that 'mock the stale, advocate change' was the prevailing current of late-Warring-States thought.

本篇出自《吕氏春秋·察今》，署名作者吕不韦（？—前235），战国末期卫国濮阳人，原为阳翟大贾，后辅佐秦庄襄王、嬴政父子，官至秦国相邦，封文信侯，食洛阳十万户。吕不韦执政期间，招致门客三千人，「人人著所闻」，辑成《吕氏春秋》（又称《吕览》）二十六卷，成书于秦王政八年（前239）前后，兼采儒、道、墨、法、名、农诸家之说，是先秦杂家的代表作。《察今》篇主旨是「世易时移，变法宜矣」——治国之法当随时代变化而更张，不可拘守先王成法；为此连举「循表夜涉」「刻舟求剑」「引婴投江」三则寓言，本篇即其一。故事设于楚国（今两湖一带），楚地多江河湖泊，「涉江」为日常之事，以之设喻最为贴切。此「版本」为通行本中完整叙事的核心段落，从「楚人有涉江者」至「入水求之」，叙尽刻舟求剑之事的始末。韩非亦有近似寓言（《韩非子》论「守株待兔」同旨），可见「讥守旧、倡变法」是战国末期的时代思潮，吕不韦以商人拜相、深知时变之重要，故于《察今》篇特重此理。

Art

In form this is a fable-sketch of the pre-Qin masters, the typical reasoning prose of the Lü Shi Chun Qiu—first a story that sees the large in the small, then the principle it illustrates. Structurally it has three layers by action: the first, 'a man of Chu crossing the river; his sword fell into the water,' sets the cause in seven characters; the middle, 'he at once notched the boat, saying: this is where my sword fell,' writes the fool's first response—'at once' shows his flustered haste, 'saying' introduces his self-assured words, stated with finality yet already foolish in ignoring that the boat moves while the sword stays; the last, 'when the boat stopped, he entered the water from the notched place to seek it,' writes his act—'the boat stopped' marks the key moment (the shore, far from where the sword fell), and 'entered the water from the notch' is absurd without his knowing it. The finest art is the construction of 'displacement': the fool takes 'the notch on the boat' as 'the sword's place in the water,' but the notch moves with the boat while the sword stays—the separation of the two places is the whole point's edge. The narrator stays impassive throughout, writing only actions and words in plain description, with no贬 word yet the mockery cuts to the bone.

文体上，本篇属先秦诸子散文中的寓言小品，是《吕氏春秋》说理文的典型形态——先叙一则以小见大的故事，再揭其义理。结构上可按动作分三层：首层「楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水」交代人物与事件，七字立起「剑落水」的起因；中层「遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠」写愚人的第一反应——「遽」字写其慌乱中急刻记号，「曰」字引出其自以为是的话，「是吾剑之所从坠」一句说得斩钉截铁，俨然胸有成竹，其实正是不知舟行剑止的愚妄；末层「舟止，从其所契者入水求之」写其行动——「舟止」二字点出关键的时间节点（船已到岸，与剑落水时已相去甚远），「从其所契者入水求之」写其按刻痕下水，荒谬至极而不自知。艺术手法上最见功力的是「错位」的构造：愚人把「舟上的刻痕」当作「水中剑的位置」，而刻痕随舟行而移，剑则沉留原地，两处的分离正是全篇机锋；叙事者全程不动声色，纯以白描写其动作与言语，无一贬词而讥刺入骨，正合《吕氏春秋》「取近譬远、以事明理」的寓言笔法。语言极简，五十三字写尽始末，是文言文「以少总多」的范本。

Allusions

The piece's cultural meaning traces to the pre-Qin thread of 'examining the present' and the metaphoric tradition of 'sword' and 'boat.' The chapter cites this fable to argue that 'the laws of former kings came down through antiquity; men added to or subtracted from them—how can one take them as a model,' its thesis ascending from the Yi Jing's 'extremity brings change, change brings passage, passage brings endurance' to Shang Yang's 'governing does not follow one way; to benefit the state one need not imitate the ancients' and Han Fei's 'when the age differs, affairs differ.' 'Carving the boat to seek the sword' is the figured satire of 'keeping former kings' laws without adapting.' The 'boat' and 'water' have deep meaning: the boat moves and the water flows, the sword falls and the water stays—boat and water are like law and circumstance; law is like the boat's mark, shifting with circumstance (water), and seeking the sword by the mark is seeking the changed reality by an unchanged sign, bound to fail. The allusion became the idiom 'carving the boat to seek the sword' (also 'notching the boat'), mocking those wedded to fixed rules; Liu Zhiji of the Tang and Qing critics of textual study both cited it. Its core of 'when times move, the law changes' has outlasted the Warring States as a common token of Chinese thought on change and constancy.

本篇的文化内涵，可溯至先秦「察今」「变法」的思想脉络与「剑」「舟」的隐喻传统。《察今》篇引此寓言，本为论证「先王之法，经乎上世而来者也，人或益之，人或损之，胡可得而法」，其主旨上承《周易》「穷则变，变则通，通则久」的变易哲学，下启商鞅「治世不一道，便国不法古」、韩非「世异则事异，事异则备变」的变法主张——「刻舟求剑」正是「法先王而不知变」的形象化讽刺。「舟」与「水」的意象亦有深意：舟行而水动，剑坠而水留，舟与水的关系恰如法与时势的关系——法如舟，随时势（水）而移，刻舟以求剑，是以不变的记号求已变的现实，必然落空。后世此典演为成语「刻舟求剑」，又作「契舟求剑」，专喻拘泥成法、不知变通之人；唐人刘知几《史通》论史法之变、清人评考据之弊，皆引此喻。其「时移则法变」的文化内核，已超越战国语境，成为中国人思考「变与不变」「今与古」关系的通用智慧符号，与「守株待兔」「郑人买履」等同族寓言共同构成了先秦「讥守旧」的寓言群。

Commentary

'Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword' is among the most widely spread of pre-Qin fables, its keen satire undiminished for over two thousand years. In literature, the Lü Shi Chun Qiu is known for 'embracing all, eclectic yet ordered,' its fables terse as daggers; this fifty-three-character piece, with its simple narrative, sharp turn, and clean close, stands with the Han Fei fables as the twin gems of Warring-States fable and a source of later anecdotal and satirical literature. In thought, its value is the deepest truth in the plainest story: the sword falling is ordinary, but the man seeks it by carving the boat—the absurdity is not in 'seeking' but in 'carving'; the boat has moved yet the mark goes with it, seeking the fixed reality by a moving sign. Extended to statecraft: law is like the boat's mark, circumstance like the flowing water; the laws of former kings cannot fit today—'examine the present' then 'change the law' is the Lü Shi Chun Qiu's core, shared by Legalists and Eclectics. In use, the idiom now mocks rigid, unadapting minds, alongside 'waiting by the stump' and 'the Zheng man buying shoes,' a lesson in the national memory: proceed from reality, advance with the times.

「刻舟求剑」是先秦寓言中流传最广的成语之一，两千余年来以其深刻的讽刺力长盛不衰。就文学言，《吕氏春秋》以「兼收并蓄、杂而不乱」著称，其中寓言多简隽如匕首，本篇五十三字写尽愚人始末，叙事之简、转折之陡、收束之利，与《韩非子》寓言并为战国寓言的双璧，开后世笔记小说与讽刺文学之先河。就思想言，本篇的价值在于以最通俗的故事说出最深刻的哲理：剑落水中，本是寻常事故，愚人偏以刻舟之法求之，其荒谬不在「求剑」而在「刻舟」——舟已行，而刻痕随之，以舟上之痕定水下之剑，正是以不变应万变的守旧思维。此理由寓言而治国：法如舟痕，时如流水，先王之法不能适用于今日之世，「察今」而后「变法」，正是《吕氏春秋》的核心主张，也是先秦法家与杂家共同的清醒。就应用言，「刻舟求剑」现多讥讽思想僵化、不知变通之人，与「守株待兔」「胶柱鼓瑟」同为「不知变」家族的成语，入选各级教材，其教训——「一切从实际出发，与时俱进」——已成为民族集体记忆中的智慧警句，其艺术与思想的双重生命力，历两千三百年而不衰。

Prosody

Form Pre-Qin masters' prose (fable-sketch, unrhymed narrative)先秦诸子散文（寓言小品，散体叙事）

Rhyme Unrhymed literary Chinese, winning by the cadence of short phrases and the flow of verbs: the opening long sentence eases the narration; 'he at once notched the boat, saying...' quickens with short phrases; 'the boat stopped, he entered the water from the notch to seek it' lands two beats then four, like a stone dropped, abrupt and final.本篇为散体文言，不押韵，而以短句的顿挫与动词的连贯取胜：「楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水」以长句缓叙；「遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠」短句相接，节奏渐急；「舟止，从其所契者入水求之」两字一顿、四字一收，如掷石入水，戛然而止。

Tone pattern Varied phrase lengths, the tone moving from calm narration to a sudden turn: 'a man of Chu crossing the river' begins placidly; 'his sword fell into the water' tightens; 'he at once notched the boat' is a four-character staccato; 'saying: this is where my sword fell' draws out the quotation; the close 'the boat stopped... entered the water to seek it' is clean and lingering.句式长短相间、语气由平叙而急转：「楚人有涉江者」平静起笔，如说书人开篇；「其剑自舟中坠于水」叙述事故，语势略紧；「遽契其舟」四字短句，顿挫急促，写慌乱之状；「曰：是吾剑之所从坠」以引语拖长，写其笃定自白；末「舟止」二字如鼓点一停，随即「从其所契者入水求之」九字收煞，干净利落，余味无穷。

Reading note Though prose, its sound-beauty lies in 'rhythm writing the mood, cadence conveying the absurd.' In fifty-three characters the sentence lengths track the fool's psychology: the opening 'a man of Chu crossing the river' is placid; 'his sword fell' tightens; 'he at once notched the boat' bursts into a four-character staccato; 'saying: this is where my sword fell' slows the quotation, his certainty contrasting the earlier fluster; the close 'the boat stopped' is a drumbeat halt, then 'entered the water to seek it' ends clean—like a weight dropped in water. The unrhymed form fits the fable's cool, observing posture.本篇虽为散文，其声律之美在「以节奏写神情、以顿挫传荒谬」。全文五十三字，句子的长短安排与愚人的心理节奏完全同步：开篇「楚人有涉江者」七字平稳叙起，如拉开帷幕，读者静观其变；「其剑自舟中坠于水」叙事故，节奏稍紧；至「遽契其舟」陡然以四字短句一顿，「遽」字急促，「契」字着力，仿佛见其手忙脚乱之态；「曰：是吾剑之所从坠」转以引语缓拖，「是」字指认、笃定异常，语速放缓，恰与「遽」的慌乱形成声情的对照——愈是放慢，愈显其自以为是；末句「舟止，从其所契者入水求之」先以「舟止」二字如鼓点骤停，再以「入水求之」四字收束，声音由缓入急、由静入动，如重物落水，戛然而止。这种「以句长控制节奏、以引语制造停顿」的声律设计，使读者在诵读中直接感受到愚人从慌乱、笃定到机械行动的完整过程；而散句不押韵的散体形式，恰好配合寓言「冷眼旁观」的叙事姿态——不加声韵之华，纯以叙事节奏传神。后世寓言与笔记小说在句式的简炼顿挫上，多受此类先秦寓言影响，本篇正是其源头形态之一。

Line by line

楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水，遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠。

There was a man of Chu crossing the river; his sword fell from the boat into the water. He at once notched the boat, saying: 'This is the place from which my sword fell.'

楚国有个渡江的人，他的剑从船上掉进水里，他急忙在船帮上刻下记号，说：这里就是我的剑掉下去的地方。

A man of Chu was crossing a river when his sword fell from the boat into the water. He hastily cut a notch in the boat, saying: 'This is exactly where my sword dropped.'

此句是故事的起因与发展，寥寥数笔写尽愚人的自以为是。「楚人有涉江者」以「有……者」句式引出人物，如说书人开篇，简洁明了；「其剑自舟中坠于水」交代事故——「自舟中」点明剑落水的起点在船上，「坠于水」三字写剑之去向，为后文「刻舟」的荒谬埋下伏笔。「遽契其舟」写愚人的第一反应，「遽」训急忙、仓促，见其慌乱中不加思索，随手在船帮上刻记号——一个「遽」字，已暗示此计之草率；「曰：是吾剑之所从坠」写其开口自白，「是」字指刻痕，「所从坠」即「坠落之处」，此语说得斩钉截铁、胸有成竹，仿佛已为失剑留下万全之据，实则完全忽略了舟行剑止的根本事实——剑坠于水即沉留原处，舟则继续前行，刻痕随舟而移，早已与剑的位置分离。愚人的笃定与事实的错位，在一句自白中形成尖锐对照，讽刺已不言自明。此句叙事冷静、白描入微，是寓言「以事显理」的典范。

This line is the story's cause and development, a few strokes writing the fool's self-assurance. 'There was a man of Chu crossing a river' the 'there was a man of' formula introducing the person, like a storyteller's opening, clear; 'his sword fell from the boat into the water' the mishap - 'from the boat' the start of the sword's fall on board, 'into the water' its going, priming the absurd 'cutting the boat' below. 'He hurriedly cut a mark on the boat' the fool's first reaction, 'hurriedly' meaning hasty and flurried, showing his unthinking haste, the notch cut on the gunwale at a stroke - one word 'hurriedly' already hinting the scheme's carelessness; 'saying: This is where my sword fell' his own declaration, 'this' pointing the cut, 'where it fell' the 'spot of falling'; the words spoken clipped and confident, as if he had secured the lost sword, yet wholly missing the root fact - the boat travels, the sword stays: the sword sank and remains, the boat goes on, the notch travels with it, long parted from the sword's place. The fool's certainty and the fact's dislocation, set in one declaration, the satire self-evident. The narrative calm, the plain brush minute, the fable's model of 'showing principle through event.'

舟止，从其所契者入水求之。

When the boat stopped, he entered the water from the place he had notched to search for it.

船靠岸停下之后，他便从船帮上刻着记号的地方跳进水里，去寻找那把早已沉留在落水处的剑——他以为刻痕所在就是剑之所在。

When the boat moored, he dived into the water from the notched spot on the gunwale, seeking the sword long sunk where it fell - believing the notch's place was the sword's.

此句是故事的结局，也是全篇机锋的收束，九个字写尽荒谬的完成。「舟止」二字是全文最关键的转折：船终于靠岸停下，此时距剑落水已不知行了多远——船在动而剑不动，剑沉留在落水之处，刻痕却随舟行至他处，「舟止」正点出这一错位的彻底暴露。然而愚人浑然不觉，「从其所契者入水求之」——他跳进水里，却不是去找剑落水之处，而是从刻记号（现已在别处）的地方下水，其行动之机械、思维之僵化，令人失笑之余更觉可悲。「入水求之」的「求」字，与「刻」字呼应：刻痕是他的「坐标」，舟止是他「行动的时机」，一切看似逻辑完备，唯其前提（舟不动）已荡然无存——以错误的坐标去求已失之物，越是认真越是荒谬。此句收束全篇而不加一字评论：不写他找到与否（其实不可能找到），不写其懊悔之状，戛然而止，让读者自己领悟「时移世易、法不可守」之理，留白之处正是讽刺最凌厉处，也是《吕氏春秋》「以事明理、言尽意不尽」的寓言艺术之所在。

This line is the story's end, and the gathering of the whole's point, nine characters writing the absurdity's completion. 'When the boat stopped' the crucial turn: the boat at last beached, by now how far the sword has traveled since it fell - the boat moving, the sword still; the sword sunk where it fell, the notch carried elsewhere, 'boat stopped' exposing the dislocation to the full. Yet the fool knows nothing; 'he entered the water from the place he had cut to seek the sword' - he dives, not to where the sword fell, but from the notch (now elsewhere); the mechanical act, the rigid mind, moving one to laughter and to pity. The word 'seek' in 'entered the water to seek' answers the word 'cut': the notch his 'coordinate,' the boat's stopping his 'time,' all seeming logically complete, save that the premise (the boat stays) is gone - seeking a lost thing by a wrong coordinate, the more earnest the more absurd. The line closes the whole without a word of comment: not writing whether he finds it (impossible), not writing his regret, stopping short, letting the reader grasp the principle that 'times change, the old law cannot be kept'; the blank is where the satire cuts sharpest, the Lüshi Chunqiu's art of 'reason through event, words end, meaning endless.'

Study

Word focus

遽遽 (ju), 'hastily / at once,' in 'he at once notched the boat' is the first stroke sketching the fool's manner. It writes both the speed of his action—eager to remedy his loss in panic—and the thinness of his thought: precisely because he acts in haste, he fails to consider that the boat moves while the sword stays. With this word, notching becomes a flustered reflex, and the fool's character and the irony are both established. 「遽契其舟」之「遽」字，是全篇刻画愚人神态的第一笔。「遽」训急忙、仓促，《说文》释为「传也」，引申为迅疾。此字的妙处在于：写剑坠水后，愚人「遽」然刻舟——情急之中不假思索，随手以刻痕为记，自以为抓住了救命稻草，实则正因仓促，才未及思考「舟行剑止」的基本道理。一个「遽」字，同时写出两层意味：其一，写动作之快，见其爱剑心切、急于补救的慌乱；其二，写思虑之疏，见其急中生「错」、草率行事的愚妄——越是「遽」，越显出刻舟之法的荒谬，因为真正稳妥的办法（记下两岸标志或待船停后于落水处寻觅）需要冷静，而「遽」恰恰是冷静的反面。若删此字，则刻舟不过是一个笨办法；有了「遽」字，刻舟成了慌乱中的本能反应，愚人的性格与故事的反讽同时成立。一字写神，正是《吕氏春秋》炼字的功力，也是先秦寓言「以一字传神」的典范。

所从坠 所从坠 (suo cong zhui), 'the place from which it fell,' in 'this is where my sword fell' is the key phrase of the fool's self-justification and the very condensation of the error. It is a 'suo' construction marking location. The fool equates the boat's position with the water's position; the phrasing is flawless yet factually absurd, for the notch has drifted with the boat while the sword stays. The graver his certainty, the plainer his absurdity. 「是吾剑之所从坠」之「所从坠」三字，是愚人自白中的关键词，也是全篇谬误的凝结处。「所从坠」即「所从坠落之处」，是「所」字结构（所学介词结构作名词），文言中表处所的经典用法。愚人指着舟上的刻痕说：这里就是我的剑坠落的地方——他把「舟上的位置」等同于「水中的位置」，这三字正是这一错误的语言外壳：就字面言，「所从坠」确乎指剑落水之处，并无语病；就事实言，剑落水后即沉留原处，而「从」之所指（舟上的刻痕）已随舟迁移，「所从坠」成了一个不断漂移的虚假坐标。妙在愚人说得一本正经、斩钉截铁，「是」字（这）的指认语气何等笃定，仿佛亲见——其自以为是愈甚，其荒谬愈显。此三字以最规范的古汉语语法说出最悖理的判断，形式之严整与内容之荒诞形成绝妙反差，正是寓言「以言写人」的神来之笔，也让「刻舟求剑」之谬在语言层面纤毫毕现。

求求 (qiu), 'to seek,' in 'entered the water to seek it' is the closing eye and the completion of the satire. The fool seeks with earnest purpose, clear target, and firm conviction—yet he seeks by a drifting notch for a sword long fixed in place; the more he seeks, the wronger he goes. The profundity: the fool's pity is not in 'not seeking' but in 'seeking wrongly'—effort spent on a false premise. Extended, the chapter's warning to govern by former kings' laws and seek order is like seeking a sword by notching the boat. 「从其所契者入水求之」之「求」字，是全篇收束的诗眼，也是讽刺的最终完成。「求」训寻找、索求，先秦典籍中「求剑」「求马」皆为常语；此处愚人「入水求之」，动作认真、目标明确（按刻痕定位）、态度笃定，一「求」字写尽其对错误方法的忠实执行——他不是不努力，而是努力得极其荒唐：以随舟漂移的刻痕为坐标，入水去求早已留在原处的剑，越「求」越错，越认真越荒谬。此字的深意在于：愚人的可悲不在「不求」，而在「错求」——他并非怠惰敷衍，而是以全部的专注投入一个错误的前提，这正是「刻舟求剑」比一般讽刺更深刻的地方：许多执迷不悟者并非不肯努力，而是把努力用在了随势而移的「刻痕」上。由此及彼，《察今》篇「法先王而求治」，正如刻舟而求剑——方法已错，用力愈勤，离目标愈远。「求」字轻轻一落，全篇的机锋与《吕氏春秋》「察今变法」的主旨同时收束，言尽而意不尽。