All poems

唐 Tang · 诗 Poem

落第东归

Returning East After Failing the Exam

罗邺

Luo Ye

科举Imperial Examinations 落第Failing the Exam 羁旅Travel and Sojourn 愁思Melancholy and Longing

年年春色独怀羞，强向东归懒举头。
莫道还家便容易，人间多少事堪愁。

Year after year, amid spring's splendor, I alone harbor shame;
Forcing myself to return eastward, too weary to lift my head.
Do not say that going home is an easy thing—
In this human world, how many matters are worthy of sorrow?

Listen

Meaning

The poet, having failed the imperial examinations repeatedly, returns home in shame. The spring scenery, which should delight, only sharpens his personal humiliation. He forces himself to travel eastward, but cannot even raise his head. The final couplet deepens the anguish: returning home is not a relief, for there are countless sorrows in life beyond this one failure.

年年面对春色，唯有我独抱羞惭；强打精神向东归去，懒得抬起头来。莫要说回到家乡便容易，人间有多少事值得愁烦。

Appreciation

This poem is often read alongside Qian Qi's 'Failing in Chang'an' and Dou Lu Fu's 'Leaving Chang'an for Home After Failing the Exam' as a trio of 'failed exam poems.' All three express the anguish of failing the civil service exams: Qian Qi contrasts brilliant spring scenery with sorrowful tears; Dou Lu Fu captures the embarrassment of taking leave of his host; Luo Ye directly conveys the accumulated shame of repeated failure through the word 'alone,' turning the universal spring scene into a private humiliation. The final two lines add another layer of suffering: returning home is not liberation but the start of new worries—much like Gao Shi's 'New Year's Eve' where even home cannot escape the erosion of time. Reading these together reveals the dual oppression of time (spring/year) and space (Chang'an/homeland) in Tang-dynasty expressions of disappointment. Luo Ye's quatrain, with its plain words carrying profound sorrow, is an ideal starting point for comparative study.

【白话串讲】 “年年春色独怀羞，强向东归懒举头”——罗邺写落第东归：落第回家，羞于见人。“莫道还家便容易，人间多少事堪愁”——别以为回家容易，人间有多少事让人愁。【意象与手法】 “年年春色独怀羞”以“独”字把群体性春景化为个人化的羞惭；“强向东归懒举头”写落第回家的窘态；“莫道还家便容易”翻进一层写归乡非解脱反是另一重愁的起点。以浅语写深愁。【情感与主旨】唐代落第诗专题的代表，直抉屡试不第的耻辱感，写科场失意者“无家可避的漂泊”，与钱起《长安落第》、豆卢复《落第归乡》同为落第诗名篇。【名句点睛】常考“年年春色独怀羞，强向东归懒举头”以独怀羞写落第之耻；“莫道还家便容易，人间多少事堪愁”以还家不易写愁绪。

Background

Luo Ye wrote this poem at a time when he, having failed the examinations multiple times, was leaving the capital in low spirits to return to his hometown. Luo Ye was a late-Tang poet, styled as one of the 'Three Luos' along with Luo Yin and Luo Qiu. He was renowned for his talent but never passed the jinshi examination, spending his life in minor posts. In the Tang dynasty, the jinshi examination was extremely competitive, with only twenty to thirty successful candidates each year, and failure was far more common than success. Success depended not only on ability but also on reputation, recommendation, and luck. For a scholar who traveled to Chang'an year after year only to fail, the loss went beyond official rank—it included honor, youth, and the courage to return home. This poem captures the accumulated shame of repeated failure. The spring scene remains the same each year, but only he feels ashamed; forcing himself to return east, he cannot even lift his head. The final line deepens the tragedy: one might think home is an escape, but 'how many sorrows are there in life?' Returning home is not the end—it becomes a new source of anxiety. To understand this poem is to see not a single disappointment but a prolonged spiritual impasse caused by the examination system. In Tang society, passing the exam meant ascending the dragon gate and joining the scholar-official class; failing meant returning to the countryside as a commoner. The social gap between these outcomes was immense. A person who fails 'year after year' faces not only the loss of official position but also family expectations, the gaze of the community, and the erosion of youth. Luo Ye's poem renders this long, repeated humiliation in stark terms, revealing the other side of the gleaming examination roster: the talented but anonymous, gradually fading. It is therefore not just a poem about failing an exam, but a spiritual history of a wandering scholar.

罗邺这首《落第东归》，写于他屡试不第、黯然离京返乡之时。罗邺晚唐诗人，与罗隐、罗虬并称『三罗』，才名甚高却终身不第，沉沦下僚。唐代科举，进士科录取极严，每岁不过二三十人，落第者十之八九；而及第与否，往往不只凭才学，更看声望、荐引与运气。一个士子数赴长安、年年铩羽，所失不止功名，更有颜面、青春与归乡的勇气。此诗写的正是这种『年年落第』的累积性羞耻：春色年年相似，唯有自己年年怀羞；强作东归，却连头都懒得抬。更可叹在末句——本以为回家是解脱，谁知『人间多少事堪愁』，归乡非但不是终点，反是另一重愁的起点。读懂这首诗，要看见的不是一次失意，而是一种被科举制度反复碾压的、长达数年的精神困局。更可注意的是，落第之于唐人，不只是一时得失，而关乎整个士人身份的安顿。及第则跃龙门、入士流，落第则归田巷、老布衣，二者的社会落差判若云泥。一个『年年』落第的人，面对的不仅是功名，更是家族的期待、乡里的目光、青春的耗散。罗邺此诗把这种漫长的、重复的羞耻写得入骨，让我们看见科举制度光鲜榜文背后的另一面——那些名字从未出现过的、逐年黯淡下去的才士。它因此不但是一首落第诗，更是一页寒士的心灵史。

Art

The artistry of this poem lies in its progressive layering of the shame of repeated failure. The first line, 'Year after year, amid spring's splendor, I alone harbor shame,' uses 'year after year' to establish temporal repetition, and the word 'alone' transforms the city's spring into personal disgrace—while others enjoy the season in triumph, he alone is ashamed. The second line, 'Forcing myself to return eastward, too weary to lift my head,' depicts action: 'forcing' expresses reluctant endurance, while 'too weary to lift my head' is the concrete gesture of one too ashamed to face acquaintances or the spring light. This single downward gesture captures his fallen state. The final two lines take a further turn: 'Do not say that going home is easy—how many sorrows are there in this world?' The surface comfort of returning home is immediately overturned. The reversal from 'escape to another place' to 'nowhere to escape in spirit' is profound. The language is plain and colloquial, but through words like 'year after year,' 'alone,' 'forcing,' and 'do not say,' the poem achieves a melancholic, forceful effect. It is among the most expressive of late-Tang failed-exam poems. The poem's restraint is its strength. It does not rant about unjust examiners or corrupt systems; it simply depicts a man bowing his head as he travels east and murmuring, 'Do not say that going home is easy.' All the sorrow is contained in this single gesture and whispered line, which is more distressing than loud lamentation. Especially, the characters 'forcing' and 'weary' illustrate both the effort of endurance and the incapacity to look up, drawing to the extreme the tension between maintaining dignity and falling apart. Late-Tang failed-exam poems tend toward open lament; Luo Ye uniquely conveys this through understatement, finding depth in plainness—hence his reputation for austere, restrained verse.

此诗的艺术，在于把『屡试不第』的耻辱感写得层层递进。首句『年年春色独怀羞』以『年年』点出时间的重复，以『独』字把满城春色化为个人的羞惭——别人趁春得意，唯我独抱惭愧。次句『强向东归懒举头』写动作：『强』是无奈的撑持，『懒举头』是羞见故人、羞见春光的具体姿态，一个低头动作写尽落魄。后二句翻进一层：『莫道还家便容易，人间多少事堪愁。』表面安慰自己还乡，实则立刻推翻——别以为回家就轻松，人世间值得愁的事多着呢。这种『以为解脱、实则更愁』的转折，把空间上的逃离与精神上的无处可逃一并写出。全诗语皆浅近如话，却以『年年』『独』『强』『莫道』几个词，把深愁写得沉郁顿挫，是晚唐落第诗中最见性情的一首。此诗在艺术上的克制，恰是其力量所在。它不写考场如何不公，不写主考官如何昏聩，只写一个人低头东归的姿态与心里那句『莫道还家便容易』。所有的悲，都收束在一个动作、一句低语里，反而比痛哭更让人难受。尤其『强』与『懒』二字，一写勉力支撑、一写无力抬头，把落第者的体面与崩溃之间的那根弦写到了极致。晚唐落第诗多悲苦语，罗邺独以含蓄胜，于浅近中见沉郁，正是他诗格清苦而耐读的原因。

Allusions

This poem uses no explicit literary allusions, but it is deeply embedded in a long tradition of 'failed-exam poetry' in Tang literature. After the examination system flourished, poems about failing became a distinct subgenre. Qian Qi's 'Failing in Chang'an' ('The nine gates are deep, flowers lush and willows dark; drinking and singing sadly, tears fill my lapel') uses a happy scene to reflect sorrow, while Dou Lu Fu's 'Leaving Chang'an for Home After Failing the Exam' ('In my guest lodging, sorrows are many and spring goes unheeded; hearing the oriole, I suddenly sigh at the new willows') captures the awkwardness of parting. Both are predecessors to Luo Ye. The phrase 'returning east' carries cultural resonance: Tang scholars traveled west to Chang'an for office, and when disappointed, they 'returned east' (east toward Luoyang or their hometowns), in contrast to 'going west,' a symbolic spatial movement in a scholar's fate. 'Spring color' in Tang poetry refers both to the season and metaphorically to the prime years of youthful ambition. 'Year after year spring color' contrasted with 'alone harboring shame' juxtaposes nature's cycle with a stagnant life, a technique similar to the lament of time's passage in the Book of Songs. Without citing ancient texts, Luo Ye condenses the collective experience of a generation of failed scholars into a single gesture—'too weary to lift the head.' By the late Tang, this genre had developed a shared symbolic vocabulary: spring color, returning east, shameful face, tear-wet lapel. Luo Ye uses all of these but revitalizes them. For him, 'returning east' is not merely a geographic shift but a return of hope defeated—westward for ambition, eastward in failure, the route unchanged, the outcome unchanged, only the face aging. This overlay of spatial cycle and spiritual stagnation echoes the time-sorrow of the Book of Songs. Without needing specific references, the poet turns personal disappointment into a common era experience through the shared understanding of the literati, which is the most moving aspect of this failed-exam tradition.

此诗用典极淡，却置身于一条悠久的『落第书写』传统之中。唐代科举既盛，落第诗遂成一专门题材，钱起《长安落第》『花繁柳暗九门深，对饮悲歌泪满襟』借乐景写哀，豆卢复《落第归乡留别长安主人》『客里愁多不记春，闻莺始叹柳条新』写告辞之窘，皆罗邺之前辙。『东归』本含文化密码：唐人西入长安求仕，失意则『东归』（东指洛阳、故乡方向），与『西上』对举，已成士子命运的象征性位移。『春色』在唐诗里既实指时令，又暗喻少年功名之期，『年年春色』而『独怀羞』，是把自然循环与人生停滞对举，手法近《诗经》『日月其除』的时序之悲。诗人不引故实，却把一代落第士子的集体经验，凝进『懒举头』这一个动作里。此类落第书写，到晚唐已形成一套共享的意象语汇：春色、东归、羞颜、泪襟，罗邺均有所取，却能化熟为生。『东归』在他笔下不单是地理位移，更是一次次希望的折返——西上求仕、东归铩羽，年复一年，路线不变，结局不变，唯容颜渐改。这种把空间循环与人生停滞叠印的写法，暗合《诗经》『日月其除』式的时序悲感。诗人不须援引故实，只凭士子共有的经验，便把个人的失意写成了时代的共名，这正是落第诗传统最动人的地方。

Commentary

Luo Ye was known for his 'plaintive, graceful' style, and this poem is considered representative of his poems on failing the exams. Among the late-Tang 'Three Luos,' Luo Ye's style is closer to Wen Tingyun and Li Shangyin but more austere and bitter. The Ming critic Hu Yinglin in his 'Shisou' ('Thicket of Poetry') noted that late-Tang poems are characterized by 'hasty rhythm and mournful emotion,' which precisely applies here. Modern scholars of Tang examination literature often group this poem with those of Qian Qi and Dou Lu Fu, pointing out that its most distinctive features are the word 'alone' and the turn at 'do not say.' The former privatizes the communal spring as personal shame; the latter transforms spatial escape into spiritual homelessness. Some contemporary annotations further note that the final line, 'how many things in the human world are worthy of sorrow,' is not a vague generality but a summation of the many real sorrows a failed scholar faces upon returning home: the questions of villagers, the lack of livelihood, the passing of years, and family expectations. This goes beyond a simple 'I failed the exam.' In just twenty-eight characters, the poem captures the double dilemma of the cold-class scholar in the examination era: 'no way forward, no face to retreat.' It is a slice of the spiritual history of late-Tang literati. When modern readers think of Luo Ye, they often group him with Luo Yin and Luo Qiu as the 'Three Luos,' and assess his poetry as 'austere and bitter' and 'plaintive and graceful,' which this poem well supports. Though short, it conveys the temporal nature of failure—the 'year after year' aspect—with unusual poignancy, adding a depth that single-failure poems lack. Later discussions of examination literature frequently cite this poem as a prime example of the cold-class scholar's 'no way forward, no face to retreat' double bind. A mere twenty-eight characters, a millenium later, can still move the reader with that downcast, weary walk eastward—proof that great poetry is never separated by time. It writes of one person, but illuminates a whole class.

罗邺诗以『哀婉』见称，此首历来被视为其落第诸作中的代表。晚唐『三罗』中，罗邺诗风近温李而更清苦，明人胡应麟《诗薮》论晚唐，谓其『调促而情哀』，正合此诗气格。近人论唐代科举文学，多将此诗与钱起、豆卢复诸落第诗并提，认为它最突出处在『独』字与『莫道』一转：前者把群体春景私化为个人羞惭，后者把空间逃离翻成精神无寄。今人注本更指出，末句『人间多少事堪愁』并非泛语，而是落第者归乡后面对乡邻询问、生计无着、年华空老等一连串现实愁烦的总括，较之单纯写『考不上』更进一层。一首二十八字，写尽科举时代寒士『进无路、退无颜』的双向困局，是理解晚唐士人心史的一页切片。今人读罗邺，常将其与罗隐、罗虬合观为『三罗』，而论其诗则以『清苦』『哀婉』为的评，此诗恰可证之。它虽短，却把落第的『时间性』——年年、岁岁、长久的挫败——写得分外真切，补了单次落第诗所缺的纵深度。后世论科举文学，每引此诗说明唐代寒士『进无路、退无颜』的双向困局。一首二十八字，能让千年后的读者仍感到那份低头东去的卑微与疲惫，足见好诗从不被时代隔断，它写的是一个人，照见的却是一类人。

Prosody

Form Seven-syllable quatrain (Jueju), level-tone opening with first rhyme七言绝句（平起首句入韵）

Rhyme In the Pingshui rhyme system, employs the Level Tone in Rhyme Group Eleven (尤) with 'xiu' (shame), 'tou' (head), and 'chou' (sorrow) as a single rhyme throughout; the first line enters the rhyme directly. The 尤 rhyme has a deep, low quality ideal for melancholy.押平水韵下平十一尤韵：羞、头、愁三字一韵到底，首句即入韵，尤韵音色沉郁，最宜写愁。

Tone pattern The tonal pattern is: 平平平仄仄平平，平仄平平仄仄平；仄仄平平仄仄仄，平平平仄仄平平. The tones at the second, fourth, and sixth characters conform to the standard quatrain rules.平平平仄仄平平，平仄平平仄仄平；仄仄平平仄仄仄，平平平仄仄平平。平仄合七绝常格，二四六字分明。

Reading note This poem's prosody is regular, and its choice of the 尤 rhyme (xiu, tou, chou) is key. The 尤 rhyme, with its moderate openness and inward final sound, naturally conveys a lingering, suppressed emotion well suited for the sorrow of failure. The first line's 'xiu' (shame) establishes a basis of embarrassment, and the last line's 'chou' (sorrow) anchors the final long sigh, extending the resonance. The seven-character quatrain is short and risks exhausting emotion in language, but here the sustained 尤 rhyme and the oblique turn at 'do not say' leave ample room for imagination. As one reads, the sequence moves from shame to inhibition to sorrow, with the acoustic pattern descending with the emotional content—like the silhouette of a disheartened scholar walking east, farther and farther, heavier and heavier. The 尤 rhyme is one of deep gloom; the three rhymes all fall into this group, reading like successive quiet sighs, naturally matching the scholar's downcast state of mind. The opening 'xiu' sets an embarrassed tone, and the closing 'chou' carries a sense of bewilderment, framing the emotion in a closed ring of sorrow. The quatrain's brevity is offset by the prolonged rhyme and the unfinished turn of 'do not say,' leaving space for the reader's imagination. The reading flows from shame to restraint to melancholy, the sound submerged in the movement of sentiment—the very image of a failed scholar walking east with bowed head, his presence fading but his weight lingering.此诗声律平正，选用尤韵（羞、头、愁）是关键。尤韵在平水韵中属沉郁一类，开口度适中、收音偏内，天然带着一种低回不尽的味道，与落第深愁正相宜。首句『年年春色独怀羞』以平声『羞』起，便定下惭恧的基调；末句『人间多少事堪愁』仍以平声『愁』收，把那一声长叹稳稳托住，余音萦绕。七绝短章最忌情尽于辞，此诗却借尤韵的绵长与『莫道』一转的未尽，留足想象空间。读来先羞、再抑、终愁，声情随辞情一路下沉，恰似一个落第者低头东去的背影，愈行愈远，愈远愈沉。尤韵在平水韵中属沉郁之部，最宜承载幽忧；此诗三韵皆落尤部，读来如一声接一声的轻叹，与落第者低回的心境天然相合。首句『羞』字起调便带惭恧，末句『愁』字收束更见茫然，首尾呼应，把情绪锁在一个闭合的哀环里。七绝短章最忌情尽于辞，此诗却借尤韵的绵长与『莫道』一转的未尽，留足想象。读来先羞、再抑、终愁，声情随辞情一路下沉，恰似一个落第者低头东去的背影，久久不散。

Line by line

年年春色独怀羞，强向东归懒举头。

Year after year, facing the spring scene, I alone hold onto shame in my heart. The word 'year after year' shows this is not a one-time loss but a cycle of repeated disappointment. The phrase 'alone' sets him apart from the rest of the world who enjoy the spring in success; the shared beauty becomes an intensely private humiliation.

年年面对春色，唯有我独抱羞惭；强打精神向东归去，懒得抬起头来。

Year after year, before the spring colors, I alone carry shame; forcing myself eastward home, I cannot lift my head.

起二句把屡试不第的耻辱写得极具身体感。『年年春色』是时间的循环——别人年年趁春得意，他年年面对同一片春色却只剩羞惭；一个『独』字最狠，它把满城共有的春景硬生生划成只属于他的耻辱背景，群体的欢乐反衬出个人的落寞。次句『强向东归』的『强』字，写的是一种撑着面子、勉强迈步的无奈；『懒举头』则是这种无奈落到身上的具体姿态——不是不能抬头，是不敢抬头，怕遇见熟人、怕看见别人高中的喜色。两个词一写心理一写动作，把一个落第士子归途上的卑微与疲惫，凝成一幅无声的背影。浅语之中，沉郁顿挫。

The first two lines write the repeated failure's shame with the strongest bodily sense. 'Year after year, before the spring colors' the cycle of time — others year after year ride the spring to success, and he year after year faces the same spring colors with nothing but shame; the one word 'alone' is the cruelest, it cuts the spring scene the whole city shares into a shame that belongs only to him, the crowd's joy set against the individual's desolation. The next line's 'forcing myself eastward home', the word 'forcing', writes the helplessness of holding up face and stepping out; 'cannot lift my head' the concrete posture that helplessness settles into — not that he cannot lift it, but that he dares not, fearing to meet an acquaintance, to see the glad faces of those who passed. Two words, one the mood one the gesture, condensing the failed scholar's humble weariness on the homeward road into a wordless back. In plain words, depressed and turned.

莫道还家便容易，人间多少事堪愁。

I force myself to journey back east, but I am too weary to raise my head. 'Forcing' captures the reluctant, face-saving effort to move, while 'lazy to raise my head' reveals his actual state—he is not physically unable to look up, but ashamed to see familiar faces or the signs of others' successful careers. This line condenses his entire bitter psychology into a simple posture.

莫要说回到家乡便容易，人间有多少事值得愁烦。

Say not that going home is easy; in this world, how many things there are to grieve!

后二句是一记冷峻的翻进，把『归乡即解脱』的错觉一举推翻。『莫道还家便容易』是自我劝慰中的自我戳破：别骗自己了，回家哪有那么轻松。紧接着『人间多少事堪愁』把视野从『考场失意』一下拉开到整个人生的困局——乡邻的探问、生计的无着、年华的空老、家族的期待，哪一件不是愁？这一转极要紧：它说明落第之痛不在一次考试，而在考试背后的整张生存之网；归乡不是终点，而是另一重愁的起点。诗人不具体写哪些愁，只以『多少事』一总括，留白处全是读者可代入的现实。以浅语写深愁，是此诗最耐品处。

The last two lines are a cold reversal, overturning at a stroke the illusion that 'going home is release'. 'Say not that going home is easy' the self-comfort that self-pierces: stop fooling yourself, going home is not so easy. Immediately 'in this world, how many things there are to grieve!' draws the gaze from 'the exam failure' to the whole tangle of life — the neighbors' questions, the livelihood with no footing, the years wasted, the family's expectations, which of them is not grief? This turn is critical: it shows that the pain of failure is not one exam, but the whole web of survival behind it; homecoming is not the end, but the start of another grief. The poet does not write which griefs, only sums them in 'how many things', and the blank is filled by the reader's own reality. Writing deep grief in plain words is the most savoring part of this poem.

Study

Word focus

年年 Year after year. This reduplicative word emphasizes the repetitive, cyclical nature of his failure, transforming a single setback into a enduring trauma. 『年年』是全诗时间结构的支点。它表明这不是一次偶然的失意，而是年复一年的循环挫败——春色年年回来，他的羞惭也年年回来，希望却年年落空。两个叠字把『一次性落第』升级为『持续性创伤』，分量陡增。在唐人落第诗中，多数写单次考场之悲，罗邺偏以『年年』拉开纵向的时间轴，让读者看见一个士子被制度反复碾压的全过程。这两个字也暗含一种无奈的宿命感：春色不改，命数如常，个体的挣扎在函数般重复的失望里显得格外渺小。是理解全诗沉郁气格的一把钥匙。

独 Alone. The crucial word in the first line; it separates the poet from the rest of the spring celebrants, making the communal beauty a background to his singular shame. 『独』是首句的诗眼，也是最刺心的一个字。满城春色是公共的、共享的，『怀羞』却只他一个——『独』把群体的欢乐生生切割出一块私人的耻辱。这个字妙在它的对比张力：春光越盛、别人越得意，他的『独羞』越无处藏身。在修辞上，『独』完成了一次视角的私化，让一首本可泛写的落第诗，变成了一个具体灵魂的独白。唐人写愁多用『独』（如『独怆然而涕下』），罗邺此处却把『独』与『春色』对举，使孤独有了鲜艳而残忍的参照系，比单纯的孤更苦。

强 To force oneself. A psychological adverb that reveals the effort required to undertake the journey against his will; he has no face to return, yet no choice but to return. 『强』是次句里最见力度的虚字。它写『向东归』这一动作并非出自本愿，而是勉强撑持、硬着头皮迈出的。一个落第者本无颜东归，却又不得不归，『强』字便把这种进退维谷写活了：归，是无颜；不归，是无计。它与后面的『懒举头』形成因果——正因为是『强』归，所以才抬不起头。这个字极省却极厚，把一个士子被功名与体面双重绑架的状态，凝在出发前那一下勉力的跨步里。晚唐落第诗的哀婉，往往就藏在这种看似不起眼的虚字中。