All poems

唐 Tang · 诗 Poem

马嵬

The, Mawei

李商隐

Li Shangyin

唐诗poetry 咏史History 翻案Theme 李商隐retreat 七言绝句Theme

冀马燕犀动地来，自埋红粉自成灰。
君王若道能倾国，玉辇何由过马嵬。

The, horses, of, the, Ji, and, the, shields, of, the, Yan, shaking, the, earth, coming,
Of, her, own, self, buried, the, red, powder, of, her, own, self, turned, to, the, ash.
If, the, king, could, have, said, she, could, overturn, the, kingdom,
Why, then, would, the, jade, carriage, have, passed, the, Mawei.

Listen

Meaning

A poem of the history and the irony, written by Li Shangyin. The horses of the Ji and the shields of the Yan shaking the earth coming, of her own self buried the red powder of her own self turned to the ash — the rebellion of the opening. If the king could have said she could overturn the kingdom, why then would the jade carriage have passed the Mawei — the irony of the close. The poem is the history and the irony: the rebellion, the burying, and the close's Mawei.

河北的良马与燕地的犀甲劲卒，卷地而来，声势震天。（贵妃）自己埋葬了自己的红颜，自己化作了尘土灰烬。君王如果真的相信她能够倾覆国家的话。那帝王的车驾，又怎么会途经马嵬驿而陷此大难呢？

Appreciation

[Plain Paraphrase] The, horses, of, the, Ji, and, the, shields, of, the, Yan, shaking, the, earth, coming, of, her, own, self, buried, the, red, powder, of, her, own, self, turned, to, the, ash. If, the, king, could, have, said, she, could, overturn, the, kingdom, why, then, would, the, jade, carriage, have, passed, the, Mawei. [Structure and Thought] The poem moves from the rebellion of the horses and the shields with the burying of the red powder, through the turning to the ash, to the close's the irony of the jade carriage. [Key Technique] The poem's art is the close of the irony: of her own self buried the red powder, and the close's why then would the jade carriage have passed the Mawei — the history gathered in the burying and the close's irony. [Emotional Tone] Ironic, bitter, and historical: the poem is the rebellion, the ash and the close's Mawei.

【白话串讲】李商隐写马嵬：“冀马燕犀动地来，自埋红粉自成灰”——安禄山兵来，杨妃埋骨马嵬。“君王若道能倾国，玉辇何由过马嵬”——如果君王说红颜倾国，那他的车辇为什么经过马嵬？【意象与手法】以逻辑反诘翻「红颜祸水」旧案，两个「自」字冷峻反讽，以子之矛攻子之盾。【情感与主旨】不哀贵妃、不罪贵妃，而直指祸根在君王的荒政与仓皇播迁，识见高出寻常咏史。【名句点睛】「玉辇何由过马嵬」最锐——归谬法把责任轻轻却坚定地推回玄宗身上，翻尽千年旧案。

Background

Li Shangyin (c. 813-858), the poet of the late Tang, wrote this 'The, Mawei' of the history and the irony — the reflection on the rebellion of the An Lushan. The horses of the Ji with the shields of the Yan, the burying of the red powder, and the close's the irony of the Mawei — the poem gathers the reflection of the poet, the criticism of the history. The poem is one of the famous works of the poet's poems of the history.

李商隐，字义山，号玉谿生，怀州河内人，晚唐最杰出的诗人之一，与杜牧并称「小李杜」。此诗咏马嵬驿之变。唐天宝十五载（756，即至德元载），安史乱起，潼关失守，玄宗仓皇幸蜀，行至马嵬驿，随行禁军哗变，杀宰相杨国忠，并逼玄宗赐死贵妃杨玉环，史称「马嵬之变」。此后，「马嵬」成为诗人咏史的常见题材。传统题咏多沿「红颜祸水」或「明皇钟情」两路，或哀贵妃之死，或怜明皇之悲。李商隐此诗别出机杼，作翻案文章：世人既以「倾国」之罪归于女子，诗人便顺其语反问——若贵妃真能倾覆国家，那么君王当初又何必带她同行、终至马嵬赐死？其意实指祸根在君王的荒政与仓皇，而非一女子。此诗当为商隐早年作品，约作于文宗大和、开成年间，其时牛李党争方殷，诗人借古讽今，于历史教训中寄寓对时政的幽忧。冯浩《玉谿生诗集笺注》于此诗辨析甚详，指出其「翻尽旧案」之妙，足见义山咏史「不肯死守陈言」的一贯精神。

Art

The poem's art is the art of the irony. The rebellion opens: the, horses, of, the, Ji, and, the, shields, of, the, Yan, shaking, the, earth, coming — the horses and the shields of the shaking earth; of, her, own, self, buried, the, red, powder, of, her, own, self, turned, to, the, ash — the red powder of the own self. The irony follows: if, the, king, could, have, said, she, could, overturn, the, kingdom — the overturning of the kingdom; why, then, would, the, jade, carriage, have, passed, the, Mawei — the jade carriage of the Mawei — the rebellion, the burying and the close's irony, gathered in the poem.

此诗艺术之核心在于「以议论为诗」而议论中见锋棱，于二十八字中完成一次逻辑反诘。前二句「冀马燕犀动地来，自埋红粉自成灰」，先以浓墨铺写安史叛军之势——「冀马燕犀」代指河北、幽燕的劲卒强军，「动地来」极言其声势之浩大；随之陡转「自埋红粉自成灰」，将贵妃之死淡写为「自埋」「自灰」，不着哀怜，已暗藏冷峻。后二句「君王若道能倾国，玉辇何由过马嵬」乃是全诗枢纽，诗人假借世俗「女祸亡国」之说设一假设：若贵妃真能倾国，则君王当初必知其危险，为何仍携之入蜀、终致马嵬之祸？以子之矛攻子之盾，使「红颜祸水」论不攻自破。章法上，前二句叙事含情，后二句议论见骨，叙事为议论蓄势，议论为叙事定调，二者相生。语言则刚健斩截，无晚唐纤弱之态，是义山咏史绝句中「风骨遒上」一路的代表，与《贾生》《隋宫》同一机杼。若更进一层体味，此诗虽仅二十八字，而其反诘逻辑的严密，已具论说文之骨架。前二句以冀马燕犀之实写外患，自埋红粉之冷写内祸，叙事中已暗含因果；后二句即以世俗女祸之论为靶的，设一归谬，使旧说不攻自破。如此结构，叙事为议论张本，议论为叙事定谳，二者相生而不相夺，恰是义山咏史以思力见长之秘。世人每谓义山诗隐晦绵邈，然此篇却刚健斩截，锋芒毕露，足证其诗风非一端可尽。其翻新之处，尤在敢于逆众论而动，不随哀贵妃、罪贵妃之俗调，独以逻辑之刃直指君过，此种史识，已开宋人咏史翻案之先声。晚唐七绝多擅风情，义山此作独以风骨遒上自立，与杜牧之峻洁并峙，共同奠定了唐人咏史不徇旧说的新传统，其价值实不止于一时的讥评而已。

Allusions

'The horses of the Ji' (ji ma) are the horses of the Ji — the horses of the Ji, the troops of the rebellion; 'the shields of the Yan' (yan xi) are the shields of the Yan — the shields of the Yan, the weapons of the Lushan; 'the red powder' (hong fen) is the red powder — the powder of the red, the beauty of the Yang Guifei; 'the Mawei' (Ma wei) is the Mawei — the post of the Mawei, the burying of the close; 'the jade carriage' (yu nian) is the jade carriage — the carriage of the jade, the passing of the close.

诗中用典与代语，皆根植于马嵬史实与古典语汇。「冀马」「燕犀」本指古代冀州之良马、燕地之犀甲，《左传》《国语》多载北方劲卒，诗人以之地名代指安禄山范阳、平卢、河东三镇叛军，是用地名特产以代军队之古法，亦暗合「冀」「燕」地理，精确到叛乱发源之处。「红粉」为女子脂粉之代称，六朝以来诗文中恒以指美女，此处专指杨贵妃，语本虽浅而承袭有自。「倾国」一语典出《汉书·外戚传》李延年歌「北方有佳人，绝世而独立。一顾倾人城，再顾倾人国」，自汉以来「倾城倾国」遂成形容绝色、亦暗含「女祸」联想的固定语汇；唐人咏杨妃诗多用「倾国」二字，如白居易《长恨歌》「汉皇重色思倾国」。诗人正是抓住这一现成典故作翻案，以「若道能倾国」逆接史论，使典故反为其讽刺服务，足见其点化旧典以出新意的腕力。再就字面之代语细析，诗人于地名物产之代用，尤见唐人咏史炼字之精。冀马燕犀四字，以古冀州之良马、燕地之犀甲，精确点出安禄山起兵的河北幽燕故地，既避免直书叛贼姓名之板滞，又暗合地理真实，使一句之中兼具军事硬度与历史空间感，此为以地名物产代军队的古法，承左传国语而来。红粉代指贵妃，自六朝已然，本属常态，而诗人连用两自字写其自埋自灰，则化常语为冷眼反讽。倾国一典自汉李延年歌，至唐人咏杨妃而坐实，诗人偏将此现成语汇接过来作归谬起点，使典故反为其讽刺服务，此即所谓逆向调度之妙。统观全诗用典用代，无一处闲设，皆紧扣翻案之旨，足证义山点化旧典以出新意的腕力，非徒以獭祭为工者所能梦见。

Commentary

This poem is one of the famous works of Li Shangyin's poems of the history, quoted for the irony of its close and the reflection of its history. The red powder turned to the ash, and the jade carriage passed the Mawei, are among the admired passages of the poet's poems. Critics praise the poem's irony: the history gathered in the burying, to the close's Mawei.

此诗在李商隐咏史绝句中以「翻案」著称，历来论者多许其识见透辟。清冯浩《玉谿生诗集笺注》于此诗辨析甚详，以为「翻尽旧案，最为警切」，指出其不以寻常怜才叹逝之笔写马嵬，而直抉君过。近人张采田《玉谿生年谱会笺》亦采其说，系此诗于早年议论时政之作。今人刘学锴、余恕诚《李商隐诗歌集解》汇辑诸家，于「君王若道能倾国」一句特加疏通，以为「以世人所执女祸之论反诘之，则责任在君自明」，道出诗之逻辑内核。周振甫《李商隐选集》则强调此诗「以小见大，以婉含刚」的特质，将其与《贾生》「不问苍生问鬼神」并论，以为同是借古讽时之杰作。钱钟书《谈艺录》论义山诗，曾及此种「反言以讽」之法，可为此诗笔法之佐证。综之，诸家共识在：此诗不落「哀贵妃」「罪贵妃」两端窠臼，而以逻辑反诘归罪君王，识见高出于寻常咏史，是晚唐七绝中少见的风骨遒上之作。要之，此诗虽短，而其翻案之识、反诘之锋、冷峻之笔，三者合一，遂成晚唐咏史绝句中不可多得的遒上之作。冯浩所谓翻尽旧案最为警切，张采田系于早年议论时政，刘学锴余恕诚疏通其逻辑内核，周振甫比之贾生，诸家之说虽各有侧重，而于其归罪君王、高出寻常咏史一端，则众口一辞。义山咏马嵬，另有七律一首，以他生此生之虚无作诘，与此七绝取径各异而同工，皆不肯沿红颜祸水、明皇多情之陈套落笔，足见其咏史每出不苟的独创精神。后世如袁枚随园诗话、赵翼瓯北诗话论翻案诗，每举唐人短章为式，义山此作正其滥觞。读此诗者，不当仅赏其二十八字之巧，更当识其于千古旧案中独伸史识的胆力，方不负玉谿生诗中有人、诗中有识之誉。

Prosody

Form A quatrain of the history (qi yan jue ju)七言绝句

Rhyme The poem rhymes on the level of the group — the cadence of the quatrain that carries the bitter irony.平水韵上平十灰部（来、灰、嵬）

Tone pattern The cadence is that of the irony: the level opening with the rebellion, the turning with the burying, and the close's fall with the Mawei.仄起首句入韵式，四句两仄两平交替，合近体「二四六分明」之律

Reading note The poem's sound matches its irony: the cadences of the quatrain, and the close — 'yu nian he you guo Ma wei' — falls with the Mawei, the sound of the irony of the reflective poet.此诗为七言绝句，四句二十八字，属「仄起首句入韵」体。首句「冀马燕犀动地来」，平仄为「仄仄平平仄仄平」，「来」字平收入韵，属上平十灰部；次句「自埋红粉自成灰」为「仄平平仄仄平平」，「灰」字回押同部，与首句共成韵脚。三句「君王若道能倾国」为「平平仄仄平平仄」，以仄收不入韵，是绝句转捩之常；末句「玉辇何由过马嵬」为「仄仄平平仄仄平」，「嵬」字再押灰部，与起、承二句遥相呼应，一韵到底。三韵「来、灰、嵬」同属灰部，声情沉郁顿挫，与诗中冷峻反讽、翻案讥评的基调相称。平仄方面严守「二四六分明」：首句二四六字「马、犀、地」仄平仄相间，次句「埋、粉、自」平仄平相错，皆合律无拗。整体看，此诗声律严谨而气骨遒上，是晚唐七绝中不以柔媚取胜、而以思力见长的代表，亦见义山于近体法度之精熟。

Line by line

冀马燕犀动地来

Ji horses, Yan armor, came shaking the earth,

河北的良马与燕地的犀甲劲卒，卷地而来，声势震天。

Ji's good horses and Yan's armored troops came rolling, shaking the earth.

起句以极简之笔勾勒安史之乱的军势，是全诗叙事的宏大背景。「冀马」「燕犀」并非泛写，而是以地名特产代指安禄山起兵的范阳、平卢一带精锐——冀州古产良马，燕地多制犀甲，诗人拈此二字，既点明叛军来自河北幽燕，又暗含「胡马窥江」的地理真实。「动地来」三字极有重量，写叛军之来不是悄然而至，而是撼动山河、震荡天地，与玄宗朝承平日久的虚假安宁形成剧烈反差。这一笔的功用，在于为后文「自埋红粉」作铺垫：正因为外患如此之猛，才逼出马嵬仓皇、贵妃缢死的国家悲剧。从修辞看，起句用「借代+夸张」组合，密度极高而字字落实，是七绝起法中「大处落墨」的范例，亦见义山虽以绮密著称，而写史事时自有雄健一面。

The opening uses the most spare brush to outline the An Lushan rebellion's army power, the whole poem's narrative grand background. Ji horses and Yan armor are not generic writing, but using place-name specialties to stand for An Lushan's Fanyang-Pinglu crack troops - ancient Ji produced fine horses; Yan made rhino-hide armor; the poet picking these two characters at once names the rebels' Hebei You-Yan origin, and secretly holds the Hu cavalry observing the river geographic truth. Shaking the earth three characters most weighty, writing the rebels' coming not quietly arriving, but shaking hills and rivers, rocking heaven and earth; forming violent contrast with Xuanzong court's long-peace false calm. This brush's function lies in preparing the later self-burying the fair face: precisely because the outer threat so fierce, it forced Mawei's hasty scene, the consort strangled, the national tragedy. From rhetoric, the opening uses metonymy-plus-hyperbole combination, density high yet every character grounded; the seven-character quatrain's opening from-the-grand-place model, also showing Yishan though famed for dense beauty, yet when writing historical events has his own grand side.

自埋红粉自成灰

she buried her own rouge, became her own ash.

（贵妃）自己埋葬了自己的红颜，自己化作了尘土灰烬。

She buried her own fair face, and became her own ash.

此句紧承上句，由叛军之势陡然收束到一位女子的死亡，是全诗情感转折的关键。「红粉」代指杨贵妃，「自埋」「自成灰」连用两个「自」字，极冷峻地写出贵妃缢死马嵬、香消玉殒的结局。其炼意之深，在于「自」字暗含反讽：贵妃之死，表面是「自」取灭亡，实则是被君王所弃、被军士所逼，诗人用「自」字，正是对「女祸自取」传统叙事的冷眼拆解。同时，「红粉」之艳与「灰」之枯构成强烈色度对比，昔日六宫专宠的绝色，转瞬化为马嵬坡前一抔黄土，盛衰之速、荣枯之烈，尽在七字之中。此句不著一字哀怜，而悲凉自见，其「以淡笔写剧痛」的手法，已开宋人「以议论、以冷眼入诗」的先声，亦见义山咏史「不徇常情」的独到。

This line carries on the previous, abruptly narrowing from the rebels' power to one woman's death, the key to the poem's emotional turn. Rouge stands for Yang Guifei; self-buried and self-became-ash use two self characters together, most coldly writing the consort strangled at Mawei, her fragrance and jade perishing end. Its refining depth lies in the self character's hidden irony: the consort's death, on the surface self-chosen ruin, in truth was abandoned by the lord, forced by the soldiers; the poet using self is precisely the cold-eyed dismantling of the woman-calamity-self-chosen traditional narrative. Meanwhile, rouge's splendor set against ash's dryness forms strong color contrast; the six-palaces-favored-once beauty, in an instant becomes a handful of yellow earth before Mawei slope; prosperity's speed, glory-and-decay's intensity, all within seven characters. This line not one word of pity, yet bleakness self-shows; its using-plain-brush-for-sharp-pain method already opened Song people's using-argument-cold-eye-into-poetry front, also showing Yishan's historical-poetry not-following-convention uniqueness.

君王若道能倾国

If the lord said she could topple a realm,

君王如果真的相信她能够倾覆国家的话。

If the emperor really believed she could ruin a kingdom,

此句为后二句反诘的上半，是全诗逻辑机枢所在。「倾国」典出汉李延年歌，唐人咏杨妃诗恒用之，本含「绝色亡国」的暗示。诗人于此不正面立论，而是顺接世俗成说，先设一假设前提「若道能倾国」——若你君王当初真以为这女子会倾覆大唐，那么依常理，你必当远之避之。这一个「若」字，是虚拟，也是诱敌：它把「女祸论」还给持论者自己，使其前提与后文结论发生不可调和的矛盾。从诗学看，这是典型的「归谬」式反诘，本属论说文法，义山却以之入七绝，使短章具备思辨的力度。此句之妙，在「不争而争」：诗人不与「女祸论」正面争辩，只轻轻一个假设，便让对方立场自行坍塌，其锋芒内敛而犀利，最见玉谿生「婉而多讽」的本领。

This line is the upper half of the last two lines' rhetorical question, the whole poem's logical pivot. Topple a realm comes from Han Li Yannian's song; Tang Yang Guifei poems constantly use it, originally holding the beauty-ruins-realm hint. The poet here does not argue directly, but smoothly takes up the worldly convention, first setting a hypothetical premise if she could topple a realm - if you the lord originally truly believed this woman would topple Tang, then by common sense you must have kept far from her. This if is hypothetical, also luring-the-enemy: it returns the woman-calamity theory to the arguer himself, making his premise and the later conclusion irreconcilable. From poetics, this is typical reduction-to-absurdity rhetorical question, originally argumentative prose method; Yishan yet uses it in the seven-character quatrain, giving the short piece dialectical force. This line's subtlety lies in contending-without-contending: the poet does not debate the woman-calamity theory head-on, only one light hypothesis, yet makes the opponent's stance collapse of its own; its edge inward yet sharp, most showing Yushu Sheng's graceful-yet-satirical skill.

玉辇何由过马嵬

how did his jade carriage ever pass Mawei?

那帝王的车驾，又怎么会途经马嵬驿而陷此大难呢？

how did his jade carriage ever pass through Mawei?

结句是全诗的反诘收束，与上一句合成一个完整的逻辑逆推。「玉辇」指帝王车驾，代玄宗；「何由」即「从何处、凭什么」，是诘问词。诗人之意：若贵妃真能倾国，君王必知其危，当初断不会携她入蜀，车驾便无从经过马嵬，自也无马嵬之祸。如今既「过马嵬」而祸作，恰恰说明祸根不在贵妃之「倾国」，而在君王之荒政与播迁。一个「何由」把责任轻轻却坚定地推回玄宗身上，翻尽「红颜祸水」的千年旧案。此句与首句「冀马燕犀动地来」遥相呼应：首句写外患之实，结句归君过之因，内外因果，一线贯穿。全诗至此戛然而止，不赘哀词，而讽意已彻骨。其以七绝之短、议论之锐，成此翻案名作，足证义山「诗中有人、诗中有识」的史才。

The closing line is the poem's rhetorical-question close, with the previous line forming a complete logical reverse deduction. Jade carriage refers to the imperial carriage, standing for Xuanzong. How means from where, by what right, an interrogative word. The poet's meaning: if the consort truly could topple a realm, the lord must have known the danger; originally he would never have taken her into Shu; the carriage would never have passed Mawei, hence no Mawei disaster. Now, since it passed Mawei and disaster occurred, precisely showing the disaster's root is not the consort's toppling-a-realm, but the lord's waste-government and flight. One how pushes responsibility lightly yet firmly back to Xuanzong, overturning the thousand-year old case of the beauty as ruin. This line echoes the opening Ji horses, Yan armor, came shaking the earth: the opening writes the outer threat's reality, the closing returns to the lord's-fault cause; inner-outer cause-and-effect, one line running through. The whole poem here stops abruptly, not adding lament words, yet satire already to the bone. Its seven-character quatrain's shortness, the argument's sharpness, forming this overturning-case masterpiece, proves Yishan's poetry-history talent of a person-within-poetry, insight-within-poetry.

Study

Word focus

自埋红粉自成灰 A key expression in the poem. Read it as an image, mood, or grammar point in context. 这一句中两个「自」字是全诗炼意的核心，亦是最见义山冷眼之处。「红粉」以女子妆饰代指杨贵妃，是六朝以降诗文的惯性用法，本无新奇；奇在「自埋」「自成灰」的「自」字连用。从字面上，「自」似乎说贵妃咎由自取、自取灭亡，符合「女祸」叙事；但细味之，贵妃实是被缢杀、被牺牲，何曾「自」愿？诗人故意用「自」，正是对「红颜亡国」论的反讽式复述——你既说她倾国，那便算是她「自」埋「自」灰吧。两个「自」字叠用，既造成回环的音节张力，又使冷峻的语气加倍。炼字之要，在于「自」字表面顺承旧说、内里推翻旧说，这种「以子之矛攻子之盾」的用字策略，使短短七字包容了叙事、反讽与评判三层意蕴，是义山「字中有眼」的典范。

倾国 A key expression in the poem. Read it as an image, mood, or grammar point in context. 「倾国」二字承载全诗的诗眼与翻案的逻辑支点，其背后是汉李延年「一顾倾人国」的著名典故。自汉代起，「倾国倾城」既是绝色之赞，也暗含「女色误国」的价值判断；唐人咏杨妃，如白居易于《长恨歌》开篇即「汉皇重色思倾国」，已将这一语汇与玄宗朝的盛衰捆绑。李商隐高明之处，在于他不否定「倾国」这个词，而是把它作为辩论的「对方前提」接过来。诗人说「君王若道能倾国」——你若真信她能亡国，那你当初为何带她走？于是「倾国」由一个陈述句变成了归谬法的起点。这一个词的选用，显示了诗人对典故的「逆向调度」：不是顺着典故抒情，而是借着典故的逻辑反将一军。炼字至此，已非单纯的修辞锤炼，而是思想方法的体现，足见义山咏史「善用故实以翻案」的独绝。

冀马燕犀 A key expression in the poem. Read it as an image, mood, or grammar point in context. 「冀马燕犀」四字是起句中最见地理意识与代语功力的组合。「冀」指古冀州（今河北一带），以产良马著称；「燕」指燕地（今幽州、平卢一带），自古多犀甲劲卒。安禄山起兵正在范阳、平卢、河东三镇，正属冀、燕故地，诗人以地名特产代指叛军，既确切点明祸乱之源，又避免了直书「安禄山」可能带来的板滞。这种「以地名物产代军队」的修辞，承《左传》《国语》之古法，在唐人边塞、咏史诗中亦常见。炼字之妙，在于「马」「犀」皆为实指而「冀」「燕」皆为地望，四字组合既有军事的硬质感，又有历史的空间感，短短一语便把「安史之乱」的地理与武力双重根由说尽。相比于泛泛的「胡兵」「贼骑」，「冀马燕犀」显然更有重量与针对性，是七绝起句「以少总多」的佳例。

马嵬