All poems

战国战国 · 文 Prose

刻舟求剑

Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword (Ke Zhou Qiu Jian)

吕不韦

Lü Buwei

寓言Fable 哲理Philosophy 名篇Masterpiece

楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水，遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠。
舟止，从其所契者入水求之。
舟已行矣，而剑不行，求剑若此，不亦惑乎？

There was a man of Chu crossing the river, and his sword fell from the boat into the water; hastily he carved a mark on the boat, saying: 'This is where my sword fell from.' The boat stopped, and he went into the water to seek the sword from where he had carved the mark. The boat had already moved, yet the sword had not moved; to seek the sword in this way, is it not the confusion?

Listen

Meaning

A fable from the 'Examining the Present' chapter of the Springs and Autumns of Lü. 'There was a man of Chu crossing the river, and his sword fell from the boat into the water, hastily he carved a mark on the boat'—the fall of the sword and the marking of the boat, the haste and the absurdity of the man of Chu; 'saying: this is where my sword fell from'—the self-confident marking, the reason of the mark; 'the boat stopped, and he went into the water to seek the sword from where he had carved the mark'—the seeking of the sword, the confidence and the absurdity; 'the boat had already moved, yet the sword had not moved, to seek the sword in this way, is it not the confusion?'—the judgment, the moving of the boat and the not moving of the sword, the exposing of the absurdity, the moral of the fable. The fable satirizes those who cling to the old ways and do not know the change, and in the 'Examining the Present' chapter of the Springs and Autumns of Lü it is used to argue that the laws should change with the times, the deep meaning of the 'the world changes and the times differ, and the law should change accordingly.'

楚国有个渡江的人，他的剑从船上掉进了水里，他急忙在船边刻下一个记号，说：「这儿是我的剑掉下去的地方。」船停下来以后，他就从刻着记号的地方跳进水里去找剑。船已经向前开走了，而剑却不会跟着船走，像这样找剑，不也太糊涂了吗？

Appreciation

The essence of this text is the pre-Qin fable prose, its artistic features may be summarized as the three ends of the 'the extreme simplicity of the narrative, the extreme clearness of the contrast, and the extreme coldness of the irony.' In the narrative, the whole text of less than a hundred characters yet with the complete elements of the story: the character (the man of Chu), the event (the crossing of the river), the conflict (the sword falling into the water), the action (the hasty carving of the mark), and the ending (the entering the water to seek the sword and not obtaining), the development complete, not one superfluous character—the 'hastily carving' writing the haste, the 'this is where my sword fell from' the reason of the mark; in the contrast, the 'the boat had already moved, yet the sword had not moved' the clear contrast of the moving and the not moving, the boat and the sword, exposing the absurdity of the seeking of the sword with the contrast of the two; and in the irony, the 'is it not the confusion?' the cold question of the close, the judgment of the irony without the insult, the wisdom of the fable, the model of the pre-Qin fable prose.

【白话串讲】《吕氏春秋》写《刻舟求剑》：楚人渡江，剑掉进水里，他“遽契其舟”——在船上刻记号，说：“是吾剑之所从坠”。船停了，他从刻记号的地方下水找剑。“舟已行矣，而剑不行，求剑若此，不亦惑乎”——刻舟求剑。【意象与手法】这是《吕氏春秋·察今》中的著名寓言，夹叙夹议、以事明理：先以八十余字讲完一个完整的小故事，叙事简洁、动作传神（「遽契」「入水求之」），最后一句「不亦惑乎」以反问点破，讽刺之意冷峻而出；舟行与剑不行的对照，正是「刻舟」与「求剑」之间不可弥合的错位。【情感与主旨】寓言的本旨不在讽刺一个渡江人，而在针砭「守法不变」的治国者——时代已变而法令不变，如同船已行而记号不移。文章借小故事讲大道理：世界在运动变化，人必须顺应时势，不可拘泥成规、刻舟求剑。【名句点睛】「舟已行矣，而剑不行，求剑若此，不亦惑乎」是全篇的点睛之笔：以「行」与「不行」的对比直揭矛盾，以反问收束全篇，冷峻而深刻；「刻舟求剑」自此成为成语，喻拘泥固执、不知变通。

Background

The 'Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword' comes from the 'Examining the Present' chapter of the Springs and Autumns of Lü. The Springs and Autumns of Lü, also known as the Lü Lan, is a syncretic work compiled by the Qin prime minister Lü Buwei (c. 292–c. 235 BC) with the strength of his retainers in the late Warring States, the whole in twenty-six volumes and one hundred and sixty chapters, combining the doctrines of the Confucians, the Daoists, the Mohists, the Legalists, the School of Names, and the Agriculturists, with the purpose of the 'combining the Confucians and the Mohists, and joining the names and the law,' completed around the eighth year of King Zheng of Qin (239 BC). Lü Buwei was originally a great merchant of Yangzhai, later assisted King Zhuangxiang of Qin to the throne, rose to the prime minister, and was enfeoffed as the Marquis of Wenxin; he attracted three thousand retainers, 'making each write down what he had heard,' and after the compilation of the book hung it at the gate of Xianyang, declaring that the one who could add or subtract one character would be rewarded with a thousand jin of gold, showing the prestige of the book at the time. The 'Examining the Present' chapter argues that the laws should examine the present and change with the times, and this fable is used to illustrate the truth.

《刻舟求剑》出自《吕氏春秋·察今》篇。《吕氏春秋》又名《吕览》，是战国末期秦相吕不韦（约前292—前235）集门客之力编纂的杂家巨著，全书二十六卷、一百六十篇，汇合儒、道、墨、法、名、农诸家学说，以「兼儒墨，合名法」为旨归，成书于秦王政八年（前239）前后。吕不韦原为阳翟大商人，后助秦庄襄王即位，官至相国，封文信侯；他招致宾客三千人，「使人人著所闻」，编成此书后悬于咸阳城门，宣称能增损一字者赏千金，可见其自负与编书之严。《察今》篇专论治国者应「察己则可以知人，察今则可以知古」，主张法令制度必须随时代的变化而变化，不可一味效法先王。本文即《察今》论证「世易时移，变法宜矣」时信手拈来的寓言——以刻舟求剑者讥讽那些死守旧法、不知变通的当权者。战国之世，变法图强是时代的主旋律：商鞅在秦变法、李悝在魏变法、吴起在楚变法，吕不韦本人亦主政秦国，深知「因时变法」的迫切，此寓言正是这一时代思潮的产物。

Art

The art is the three ends of the 'the extreme simplicity of the narrative, the extreme clearness of the contrast, and the extreme coldness of the irony': the complete story in the less than a hundred characters, the clear contrast of the moving and the not moving of the boat and the sword, and the cold question of the close, the judgment of the irony without the insult—the model of the pre-Qin fable prose.

此文体的本质是先秦寓言散文，其艺术特色可括为「叙事极简、对照极明、反讽极冷」三端。就叙事言，全文不足百字，却具备完整的故事要素：人物（楚人）、事件（涉江）、冲突（剑坠于水）、行动（遽契其舟）、结局（入水求之不得），起承转合俱全，无一赘字——「遽契」二字写其急切，「是吾剑之所从坠」写其自以为是的笃定，寥寥数笔，人物之迂腐可笑已跃然纸上。就对照言，文章的核心手法是「舟」与「剑」的运动对比：「舟已行矣，而剑不行」——船在移动、剑静止不动，二者一「行」一「不行」，恰好拆穿了「从其所契者入水求之」的荒谬，把刻舟求剑者的逻辑漏洞赤裸裸地亮在读者面前，这是全篇最精妙的一笔。就反讽言，作者并不直接骂他糊涂，而以「不亦惑乎」的反问收束，语气冷峻而含蓄，让读者自己得出结论——讽刺愈是不动声色，愈见其深刻。语言上以短句为主，四字句、五字句错落（「遽契其舟」「舟止」「舟已行矣」），节奏急促，与求剑者手忙脚乱的情态相合，是「以辞气传神」的典范。

Allusions

The cultural import of this fable is deeply rooted in the tradition of the 'the reasoning with the matter' of the pre-Qin fables. First, the pedigree of the fables: the Spring and Autumn and the Warring States is the first golden age of the fable literature, the waiting by the stump for the hare, the buying the shoes of Zheng, and the self-contradiction of the Inner and the Outer Stores of the Han Feizi, and the butcher Ding cutting the ox and the learning the walking of Handan of the Zhuangzi, all the classics of the 'the illumination of the principle with the matter'; the 'Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword' of this piece, together with the 'Covering the Ears to Steal the Bell' and the 'Buying the Casket and Returning the Pearl,' the representative fables of the Springs and Autumns of Lü. Second, the philosophical significance: the fable, with the contrast of the moving of the boat and the not moving of the sword, exposing the fallacy of the clinging to the old and not knowing the change, the deep meaning of the 'the world changes and the times differ, and the law should change accordingly' of the Legalists, the ancient philosophical wisdom of the change.

此寓言的文化意蕴，深植于先秦寓言「以事喻理」的传统。其一是寓言谱系：春秋战国是寓言文学的第一个黄金时代，《韩非子》内外《储说》中的守株待兔、郑人买履、自相矛盾，《庄子》中的庖丁解牛、邯郸学步，皆是「借事明理」的经典；《刻舟求剑》与之一脉相承，以最日常的生活场景承载最深刻的哲理，正是先秦诸子「说理必设喻」的思维方式的产物。其二是「察今」思想：篇名「察今」即审察当今之情势，本文之寓意与《察今》开篇「上胡不法先王之法」的设问相扣——先王之法不可法，因其产生于彼时彼地；正如记号刻于行舟之上，其坐标早已失效。其三是运动变化的宇宙观：庄子「物之生也，若骤若驰，无动而不变」、韩非「世异则事异，事异则备变」，皆以「变」为宇宙与人事的常态；刻舟求剑者之错，正在于把运动的世界当作静止，违背了「时移世易」的天道。其四是成语化用典：自本文出，「刻舟求剑」凝为成语，历代诗文用以讥讽拘泥不化者，如清人章学诚论学「刻舟求剑」之弊，已成为汉语中「不知变通」的标准语码。

Commentary

The 'Carving the Boat to Seek the Sword' is one of the most refined pieces of the Chinese fable literature, its value enduring for over two thousand years. In the status of the text, it is one of the most popular pieces of the Springs and Autumns of Lü, together with the 'Covering the Ears to Steal the Bell' and the 'Buying the Casket and Returning the Pearl' the representative fables of the book; for the plainness of the text and the vividness of the image, it has become a household saying and a daily idiom of the Chinese, the 'carving the boat to seek the sword' the synonym of the clinging to the old ways and not knowing the change; and in the philosophy, the fable, with the concise story, illuminates the truth of the change and the adaptation, the model of the 'the small seeing the great' of the fable, the eternal wisdom of the Chinese philosophy.

《刻舟求剑》是中国寓言文学中最精粹的篇目之一，其价值历两千余年而不衰。就文本地位言，它是《吕氏春秋》中最脍炙人口的一则，与《掩耳盗铃》《买椟还珠》等并为该书寓言的代表作；因文字浅显、故事完整、寓意深刻，历来被选入各类蒙学读本与语文教材，是中国人最早接触的哲理故事之一。就思想价值言，它的寓意已超越「变法」的具体语境而上升为普遍的认知论命题——任何以固定坐标衡量变动世界、以陈旧经验应对新情况的行为，都是「刻舟求剑」；这种「因时制宜、与时俱进」的智慧，与《周易》「穷则变，变则通」、《礼记》「时中」的思想一脉相通，成为中华文化中辩证思维的重要一环。就艺术价值言，全文不到百字而情节完整、形象鲜明、反讽含蓄，是「微型叙事」的典范，其「先叙事、后点破」的结构为后世寓言（如柳宗元《三戒》）所承继。就影响言，「刻舟求剑」已凝为全民通用的成语，其生命力证明：真正深刻的道理，往往藏在一个最朴素的故事里。

Prosody

Form Pre-Qin fable prose (record-of-words and record-of-events style)先秦寓言散文（记言记事体）

Rhyme Not rhymed, the natural prose with the loose sentences, the emotion regulated by the haste and the slowness of the tone and the length of the sentences不押韵，以散句自然成文，全凭语气的缓急与句子的长短调节声情。前半叙事以四字句为主（「遽契其舟」「舟止」「舟已行矣」），短促而急促，恰合坠剑、刻舟的忙乱情态；后半议论转用五字、七字的长句（「从其所契者入水求之」「求剑若此，不亦惑乎」），舒缓而郑重，与说理的口吻相合。

Tone pattern The 'the sword fell from the boat' is sudden, the 'hastily he carved a mark' is hasty, the 'the boat had already moved, yet the sword had not moved' is calm, and the 'is it not the confusion?' is ironic—the whole from the fall to the seeking to the question, the wisdom of the fable carried by the tone句式以短句与判断句为主：叙事部分节奏紧促，一动作一顿，如连环画般逐格展开；议论部分以「而」字转折（「而剑不行」）、以反问收束（「不亦惑乎」），语气由平叙转入揶揄，冷峻之中带一丝调侃，正合寓言「以戏谑寓深意」的声口。

Reading note The haste and the slowness of the tone carry the absurdity and the judgment, the model of the pre-Qin fable.作为先秦散文，此文的声情之美不在押韵合律，而在「句子的长短错落与语气的缓急转换」所构成的叙事节奏。开篇「楚人有涉江者」七字平稳起调，如讲故事者徐徐开口；「其剑自舟中坠于水」八字稍长，写变故骤起；「遽契其舟」四字短促一顿，如刀落船帮、应声而断，刻画的急切情态跃然纸上；「曰：是吾剑之所从坠」以自称自许的语气拖长，写足其笃定自信，声调上扬，仿佛能听见此人拍着船帮的郑重宣告。中段「舟止」二字独自成句，如鼓点一记，宣告行动开始；「从其所契者入水求之」以长句铺开，写其下水打捞的郑重其事。末段转入议论，「舟已行矣」与「而剑不行」一长一短、一扬一抑，以「而」字转出关键对照；「求剑若此」四字一顿，如收网一般把全部荒唐拢于一处；「不亦惑乎」四字轻出，如冷冷一问，余音袅袅。全文以「短句写动、长句写静，急句写乱、缓句写讽」，叙事与议论声口分明，虽无韵而自成节奏，是先秦寓言散文在声情上的典范——这种「以句传神」的音韵艺术，正是后世唐宋古文「文气」论的先声。

Line by line

楚人有涉江者，其剑自舟中坠于水，遽契其舟，曰：是吾剑之所从坠。

There was a man of Chu crossing the river, and his sword fell from the boat into the water; hastily he carved a mark on the boat, saying: 'This is where my sword fell from.' (The fall and the mark: the fall of the sword and the hasty carving of the mark, the self-confident reason, the beginning of the absurdity.)

楚国有个渡江的人，他的剑从船上掉进了水里，他急忙在船边刻下记号，说：「这儿是我的剑掉下去的地方。」

A man of Chu was crossing a river when his sword dropped from the boat into the water. He at once cut a notch in the boat, saying: 'Right here is where my sword fell.'

这是寓言的起笔，也是全部荒谬的起点，四层动作一气写来，人物之迂拙已初露端倪。「楚人有涉江者」以「有……者」的句式介绍人物，是先秦叙事的常规起法，简洁交代了地点（江上）与身份（渡江人）；「其剑自舟中坠于水」点出事件——剑坠入水，本是寻常事故，补救之法自然是下水打捞，然而此人接下来的举动出人意表；「遽契其舟」四字是全段之眼，「遽」写其反应之快、动作之切，「契」写其在船帮上刻下记号，读者至此已隐约感到异样——剑在水中，何以刻舟？「曰：是吾剑之所从坠」更以人物自道点破其心理：他认定只要记住「坠落之处」便能找到剑，却浑然不知记号随舟而行、早已与剑错位。四句层层递进，把一个自信满满的糊涂人写得如在目前，为下文「舟止，从其所契者入水求之」的荒唐行动作足了铺垫。

This is the fable's opening, and the start of all absurdity, four actions written in one breath, the man's folly already showing. 'There was a man of Chu crossing a river' the 'there was a man of' formula introducing the person, the standard opening of pre-Qin narrative, the place (the river) and the person (the crosser) briefly set; 'his sword fell from the boat into the water' naming the event - the sword in the water, an ordinary mishap, the remedy naturally to dive and fish it out, yet what follows is unexpected; 'he hurriedly cut a mark on the boat' four words, the passage's eye - 'hurriedly' the speed and eagerness of his reaction, 'cut' the notch on the gunwale; the reader already feels something wrong - the sword is in the water, why cut the boat? 'Saying: This is where my sword fell' further showing his mind through his own words: he believes that if he remembers 'the spot of falling' he will find the sword, never knowing the mark travels with the boat, long parted from the sword. Four lines layer on layer, a self-satisfied fool before the eyes, fully priming the absurd act below.

舟止，从其所契者入水求之。

The boat stopped, and he went into the water to seek the sword from where he had carved the mark. (The seeking: the entering the water to seek the sword from the mark, the confidence and the absurdity of the seeking.)

船停下来以后，他就从刻着记号的地方跳进水里去寻找那把剑。

When the boat came to rest, he plunged into the water from the notched spot to look for the sword.

此句是叙事的高潮，以两个短促的动作写尽人物的执着与荒谬。「舟止」二字先交代前提——船终于靠岸停稳，这说明他并非立时下水，而是任由船行一路，等到船停才动手，其间的时间差正是荒谬之所在；「从其所契者入水求之」写其行动——不向坠剑的水域打捞，却从船帮的记号处下水。「所契者」即记号所在之处，一个「求」字写其郑重其事、煞有介事，仿佛刻下记号便万无一失。此句的讽刺在于：作者不发一言评论，只把「舟止」与「入水求之」两个动作并置，让读者自行看出其中的错位——船行则记号行，剑沉则剑不动，以「行」求「不行」，岂可得乎？叙事愈是平静客观，讽刺愈是深刻冷峻，这正是先秦寓言「寓讥刺于叙事」的笔法。

This line is the narrative's climax, two short actions writing the man's fixation and absurdity. 'When the boat stopped' first setting the premise - the boat at last beached and still; showing he did not dive at once, but let the boat travel on, acting only when it stopped; the time-lag itself the absurdity; 'he entered the water from the place he had cut to seek the sword' the act - not fishing the water where the sword fell, but diving from the notch on the gunwale. The 'place he had cut' the marked spot, the word 'seek' writing his grave and solemn air, as if the notch insured all. The line's satire lies in: the author says not a word of comment, only sets 'boat stopped' and 'entered the water to seek' side by side, letting the reader see the dislocation - the boat travels and the mark travels, the sword sank and the sword stays; seeking the 'staying' by the 'moving,' how should it be found? The calmer and more objective the narrative, the colder the satire - the pre-Qin fable's art of 'hiding satire in narrative.'

舟已行矣，而剑不行，求剑若此，不亦惑乎？

The boat had already moved, yet the sword had not moved; to seek the sword in this way, is it not the confusion? (The judgment: the clear contrast of the moving of the boat and the not moving of the sword, the cold question of the close, the moral of the fable.)

船已经向前开走了，而剑却不会跟着船走，像这样找剑，不也太糊涂了吗？

The boat has moved, but the sword has not. To seek a sword in this way - is it not confusing?

此句是全篇的收束与点睛，作者由叙事转入议论，以三句话完成点题。「舟已行矣，而剑不行」是全文的机枢：一个「已」字点明船行之久，「而」字一转，指出剑之「不行」，船与剑一「行」一「不行」，二者之间的错位被一语道破——这正是「刻舟求剑」者所忽视的关键，也是全篇立论的核心。「求剑若此」四字把前文的荒唐行动收拢到一个「此」字上，等于宣告：以这样的方法求剑，注定徒劳。「不亦惑乎」以反问收束，语气看似轻描淡写（「不亦……乎」是古汉语中典型的委婉反问），实则冷峻之极——不是厉声呵斥，而是轻轻一问，让糊涂人在一问之下自惭形秽。此句兼有总结叙事、揭示哲理、完成讽刺三重功能，是全文的点睛之笔，「刻舟求剑」之所以成为千古传诵的成语，正赖此一句之力。

This line is the whole's close and finishing stroke, the author passing from narrative to argument, three sentences making the point. 'The boat has moved on, but the sword has not' the pivot of the whole: the word 'already' marking the boat's long travel, the word 'but' turning to the sword's 'not moving'; the boat 'moving' and the sword 'not moving,' the dislocation between the two named in one phrase - this is precisely what the boat-notcher overlooked, and the whole's core. 'Seeking a sword like this' four words gathering the absurd act above into one 'like this,' declaring: by such a method, the seeking is foredoomed. 'Is it not bewildering?' closing in rhetorical question, the tone seeming light ('is it not...?' the typical tactful question of old Chinese), in truth icy - not a sharp scolding, but a soft question, making the fool ashamed under the asking. The line at once sums the narrative, reveals the philosophy, completes the satire; it is the finishing stroke, and the reason 'cutting the boat to seek the sword' became an idiom through the ages.

Study

Word focus

遽 Hastily. The word of the haste: 'hastily he carved a mark on the boat'—the hasty carving of the mark, the haste of the man of Chu, the beginning of the absurdity. 「遽契其舟」之「遽」字，是写刻舟求剑者情态的第一个关键词。「遽」训为「急、仓促」（《说文》：「遽，传也」引申为急促），此处以之修饰「契」，写此人一俟剑落，便急忙在船帮上刻下记号，动作之快、反应之切，尽在一个「遽」字。其妙有三：其一，以「遽」写其急切，恰与其判断的荒诞形成反差——动作越是急迫郑重，越是显得徒劳可笑；其二，「遽」字透露人物的心理：他以为刻舟便能锁定剑的方位，故一刻而心安，这种「以为快即以为得」的错觉，正是糊涂人的典型思维；其三，「遽」与下文「舟止，从其所契者入水求之」的从容形成时序上的照应——落剑时手忙脚乱，寻剑时却笃定从容，愈见其执迷不悟。一字写尽情态，先秦散文炼字之精，于此可见。

契 To carve. The word of the mark: 'he carved a mark on the boat'—the carving of the mark, the marking of the position of the fall of the sword, the reason of the seeking of the sword, the core of the fallacy. 「遽契其舟」之「契」字，是全篇叙事的关键动词，也是「刻舟求剑」一语的语源所在。「契」本义为刻（古文字中与「契」「锲」相通，《诗经》「爰契我龟」即以刀刻龟），此处指在船帮上刻下记号，动作具体而可感。此字的分量在于：它把「记住位置」这一抽象的心理活动物化为一个实实在在的刀痕——剑坠于水，本应记水、记岸、记方位，此人却记舟，且以刻痕为凭，仿佛记号一落便万无一失。「契」字所刻下的，不仅是船帮上的刀痕，更是此人静止思维的外化：他把运动着的舟当作了固定不变的坐标系，一字之刻，谬误千里。后世成语「刻舟求剑」正由「契」字化出（《吕氏春秋》原作「遽契其舟」，后世通行本多作「遽刻其舟」），二字形义相通，「刻」字更直白，故为成语所取。

不亦惑乎 Is it not the confusion? The phrase of the question: 'is it not the confusion?'—the cold question of the close, the judgment of the irony without the insult, the wisdom of the fable. 「求剑若此，不亦惑乎」之「不亦惑乎」，是全篇的收束语，也是反讽艺术的浓缩。「惑」训为「迷惑、糊涂」，「不亦……乎」是古汉语表委婉反问的固定句式（「不也是……吗」），二者结合，构成一种极有分寸的批评——不骂其愚，只问其惑，语气轻缓而锋芒内敛。其妙有三：其一，反问比直陈更有力量，「不亦惑乎」把判断权交给读者，让读者在会心一笑中自行得出「此人真糊涂」的结论，讽刺的效果因而加倍；其二，「惑」字用词精准——此人不是智识不足（他知道要留记号），而是根本的逻辑错位（记号随舟行），「惑」正是「执迷不悟」之谓，比「愚」「呆」更切中要害；其三，句式上与《论语》「不亦说乎」「不亦乐乎」同构，读来温文，却含着冷峻的嘲讽，是先秦散文「绵里藏针」语言的典范，一句收束，全篇生辉。